08/01/2026
Above an image of Alexander Litvinenko dying of cancer after being poisoned by Epstein's crime syndicate, image courtesy of Wikipedia.
On 08/24/2024 -- under camera and in writing -- the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle, WA, agreed to accept The Janson Report, and agreed to conduit the same to those investigating Donald Trump, including but not limited to Special Counsel Jack Smith -- was the written agreement under camera.
Within the same, our Editor had provided the DOJ what Special Counsel Jack Smith later specified was proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" -- again, about a million organized pages of evidence, coupled to 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis, with sources and authorities.
Among those the Editor gave evidence against was Kaiser Permanente, for what looked like medical fraud. The DOJ files that have been released have proven Kaiser's finances were linked to Epstein's finances through Roche-Kaiser finances and Epstein-Roche finances.
This evidence of medical fraud, medical malpractice, defamation, abandonment, government fraud, and/or other specified harm was argued with evidence and law as meaning to defame, discredit, destabilize, document the destabilization, and/or to harm our Editor, in what he argued was whistleblower retaliation by a network of government contractors he had worked for, who shared government contracting funds with one another, including Kaiser, seeking to RICO obstruct our Editor from protecting himself, the government, and murdered and endangered kids recruited by Epstein's network into illegal experiments.
You can understand the panic of any conspirator here, whether it be Kaiser, Trump, Roche, Epstein, or whoever here, because at the same time our Editor was blowing the whistle on Jeffrey Epstein's money laundering operations (Roche) harming him, the government, and defenseless little kids our Editor has been trying to defend for 24 years -- 1,971 conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein were being exposed by at least one victim in Florida, resulting in his prosecution.
And where we learned that the same people RICO obstructing our Epstein victims' story, were the same people RICO obstructing sex trafficking children in Florida to protect the 1,971 coconspirators (including Trump) of Epstein -- the GOP, GW Bush, and Robert Mueller administrations (which is why Mueller was later hand-picked not to investigate himself and what he knew about our Epstein victim story) -- instead of protecting Epstein's victims.
And so a pattern emerged that GW Bush (who would later with Bill Barr secretly meet with our Editor's brother, as did Jeb Bush and Harlan Crow, after Crow bribed Clarence Thomas, but before Thomas and Aileen Cannon conspired to RICO obstruct our Editor's matter by conspiring to attack both whistleblower and Special Counsel authorities, followed by Aileen Cannon sealing all of our Editor's proof of massive crimes and national security threats against the United States, along with our Editor Brady evidence of entrapment and torture by Leon Black's clients (Sacramento Police), who our Editor implicated in Epstein's crimes, a week before they entrapped him, and during which time Sacramento Police and/or Sheriff were operating stingray technology, and training at the same university campus that our Editor was based out of, Gateway Oaks in Sacramento.
Their intent was to coverup the provable 2002 murder and/or endangerment of children recruited from poor areas of Oakland (where Kaiser Permanente is based) into illegal medical experiments -- arguably murdering children at CHORI for Epstein's Roche (Epstein and Maja Hoffman of Roche met with the other conspirators via Edge Foundation events) -- and then this was RICO obstructed by the administrations of GW Bush and Robert Mueller -- and only an insider with legal training and expert knowledge in human subjects protections could elucidate all the same -- which our Editor had by the time he reached law school.
At the time he started his qui tam, 2013, he was part of the Freemasons (which he left when he realized the same was an imperial cult serving Epstein's UK royals), but not before he reached out to federal Judge Morrison England via Dan Daley, asking for guidance and assistance, and about a year later, it seems that they conspired to entrap him with Dan Daley's and Scott Jones' friend, coworker, and subordinate Steve Carrozzo, and to deny him due process, is now a very reasonable inference, in particular because one of the conspirators, Joseph Dongo, may have worked for one of Trump's companies linked to multi-level marketing, or not, but in retrospect our Editor believes he did, because our Editor remembers that Dongo took our Editor to a corporate event, which was a sales pitch to recruit more franchisee, and our Editor believes the same came with a life-size image of Trump, that others could take pictures with. Separately, Morrison England RICO obstructed the otherwise lawful access to Trump's finances by the State of CA seeking to investigate the same, and by doing so, he obstructed investigations into Trump and Epstein, and thus obstructed our matter, after our Editor sought guidance from the same judge on the same matter before our Editor's entrapment, and thus it seems Morisson England was protecting himself from exposure, when he protected Trump and Epstein from exposing their now provable mixed financing.
More specifically, but not limited to the same, the DOJ files revealed that Epstein was seemingly sex trafficking and monetizing using PornHub. PornHub has separately been accused of child sex trafficking, and so meeting of minds between PornHub's and Epstein's operations. PornHub's finances were managed by Putin-linked Paxum bank. Paxum and ES Family Trust funneled money into Trump's and Devin Nunes' Social Media compan(y)(ies), but also into Friends of Ron DeSantis of the GOP in Florida, and so a comixing of child sex trafficking funds linked to Epstein financing Trump's arguably failed or failing social media company operated by Russia's Devin Nunes, the former boss of Kash Patel, who faces all sorts of substance abuse, questionable spending, and questionable behavior.
Separately, circa 08/24/2024, our Editor also answered EVERY Russian wanted poster at the Department of State, because his father worked with almost every living and recently deceased French and Canadian Prime Ministers and Presidents, including Jeffrey Epstein's convicted Nicholas Sarkozy (who is now suspected of having joined the RICO conspiracy against the Editor and his family, to serve Epstein's needs, but through the proxies specified in the DOJ files), and so our Editor knew much more about these people and their relationships than most people is a fair comment, and he knew of a conspiracy involving foreign nationals linked to Epstein and Sarkozy, which he sat down to debrief the State Department on, loyal to the United States, founded by our Editor's family, the family of President John Adams.
What was submitted was arguably the largest whistleblower retaliation complaint in all of U.S. history -- estimated to be about a million pages or so in length, all Epstein-linked evidence -- coupled to 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis reports, first developed in law school, while our Editor was separately an academic researcher into Jeffrey Epstein crime syndicate is how this all came about.
The reason the complaint was so massive was two-fold.
First, Epstein and his associates harmed our Editor for 24 continuous years, and almost every day since Trump first "took office", and our Editor rarely passed up an opportunity to document harms against him after he went to law school and learned the elements of law, their sources, and their authorities.
As a documentarian, having been taught by his Roche manager "to protect himself" with a simple computer function found on most computing devices today -- the print screen function -- and so our Editor print screened any and all harm being directed at him by Roche and continued this way of documenting harm for 24 years.
Epstein's Roche, is one of the companies he laundered his money through, by at least 2003, when he funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars of his child sex trafficking and blackmail funds through Roche, through "internal banking transfer" or book transfer debits, and from a bank in Brazil (where Epstein's Safra family operated banks).
And so by the time our Editor was a university professor working for Epstein's Leon Black, he had documented 11 years of ongoing harm, stalking, whistleblower retaliation, defamation ending his career and blacklisting him, for trying to protect himself and little kids from being killed, and failing to protect either, despite 11 years of trying.
This left him with thousands of pages of evidence, which he decided to organize for two purposes, one to learn the law to become a prosecutor or public defender of the sorts of harms he had experienced for 11 years by government and big money companies, and one to further compliment his faculty practitioner requirements, which were external to the university, and yet required by the university, and he was separately a business consultant exterior to the university, as well as an executive to three different higher order branches of Freemasons.
And so he felt the best way to learn the law's elements of law was to find examples for almost every law he was studying -- having been violated in his life -- where each law he learned had been violated, and to his surprise, he was able to find evidence of almost every violation of civil, criminal, and contract law, which was great for learning law, and then he learned about qui tam law.
Understanding qui tam was a path he could still employ in 2013 for at least some justice, he took his massive legal learning project and turned the same into both a qui tam civil complaint draft (to practice legal writing, but for almost every law he learned, which is why later he submits a million pages of Epstein evidence to DOJ by 2024), and faculty practitioner academic research into RICO organizations and interorganizations linked to Jeffrey Epstein is the conclusion of that research, now ongoing because the harm has been ongoing for 24 years now, directed at our Editor and other Epstein victims who at nearly the same time as our Editor sought justice against the very same people, including but not limited to Trump, Leon Black, and Epstein -- BEFORE Trump ran for POTUS.
By 09/21/2014, Epstein's, Leon Black's, and Trump's overlapping orbits -- largely connected by Guy Wildenstein (childhood friend of Sarkozy and in his immediate orbit, and likely the person who provided Epstein's Bill Burns and Bill Gates France's top medals after Epstein's and Putin's Russians engineered Epstein's Trump to beat Epstein's Clintons in 2016, so totally rigged elections by Jeffrey Epstein is now provable with DOJ files that have been released, with conspirators receiving medals from a foreign government, seemingly beholden to them as possibly unregistered foreign agents plotting to overthrow the United States to RICO obstruct for Epstein, followed by Joe Biden picking Bill Burns to lead the CIA after seemingly being compromised by France, and possibly on behalf of Russia, but all beholden to Epstein's manipulations is what the DOJ files have been revealing, really putting Epstein front and center as the mastermind for the 2016 elections in a manner we would gladly prove to Congress or any court, but for the ongoing bipartisan RICO obstruction).
We have reached out to plenty of Democrats asking to help us against this GOP-heavy conspiracy, but they won't meet with us either, even after we let them know we could return a million missing pages of Epstein evidence to Congress. And so of course no one is reaching back out to us for the same, which from our perspective is ongoing RICO obstruction of justice for treasonous child sex traffickers beholden to Epstein's "associates".
And so that's when you know you have hit pay dirt, pure gold. When DOJ RICO obstructs Congress from access to a million pages of missing Epstein evidence, and no one from Congress who knows about the same reaches back out for the same.
We have also let Rob Bonta's office know, as well as DOJ, DOS, Ro Khanna, Shirley Weber, and so many others -- still waiting for them to reach out to the Epstein victims they allegedly represent -- including our Editor, who has asked them for help over and over again.
And then as more and more time goes by without outreach from these Democratic taxpayer-paid "representatives", the smell of overt furtherance of RICO obstruction outside of official capacity and outside of qualified immunity grows in overt furtherance of ongoing government fraud conspiracy, and the stench of rot grows even more foul.
But then maybe Trump is messing with our communications to them, and their communications to us, because what results is eventually no communication, no justice, and seemingly more RICO, is a reasonable inference.
Other than Trump messing with our communications, and/or furthering organized crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, why wouldn't these "representatives" not want to meet with those they are tasked with representing, especially when they are being obstructed a million pages of evidence an Epstein victim wants to give to Congress? The level of institutional failure here is a national security crisis.
And so America is so disappointing, because you just can't count on organized crime not to further the same from within the government, and in a manner they are the ones vested with the ability to stop that harm, and they don't. Because they are crooks is a reasonable inference with every day they don't reach out.
Yesterday we reached out to Judges Sullivan and Bastian, to let them know the who, what, where, why, when, and how, linked to the missing Epstein files, and we reached out to Katie Phang, asking for representation (based on contingency if not otherwise clear Katie), as Phang has been a serious warrior against Trump and the DOJ -- and we, America, and killed and harmed little kids in illegal medical experiments linked to Epstein need a champion like Phang. We all need a nation of Phangs to immediately stand up to all of this in as legal a manner as possible.
We let Judge Bastian's team know that Roger Rogoff was likely fired due to what we deposited at USAO/AUSA 08/29/2024, to RICO obstruct the same by unlawfully firing Roger Rogoff, who we also contacted yesterday, to let him know why he was fired -- specifically to preemptively discredit him upon his expected (legal) return -- for Trump et al. to be able to later cry foul, weaponization of government by revengeful terminated prosecutors, etc, -- which we defeated yesterday by letting the affected parties know ahead of time, before Rogoff gained significant access to all of our materials, or, maybe he knew that this was the first place he needed to go, and did, resulting in him being terminated before the first hour of his appointment was up.
Wouldn't the Editor of UPRights News love to know what transpired in those 50 or so minutes? Here's our guess. Within the first hour, Rogoff's loyalty to Trump over the Constitution was tested, and Rogoff leaned towards the Constitution, in whatever transpired, and so he was immediately terminated, is a reasonable inference, as Trump has stacked his criminal defense team and proxies as the top prosecutors, and so he couldn't have someone loyal to the Constitution in charge of what we submitted. Because that would totally destroy Donald Trump's years of false claims to the American public, who already largely hates him seems clear by his social media company adherence over time. Because what would be revealed is that Trump had never properly been the president, but rather a de facto officer, provably behaving badly and in bad faith in a manner a lower court could remove from office, and they could void or moot all of his changes to office, as has already happened to one Trump appointee.
We directly spoke with Judge Bastian's team and informed them by email and on the phone about why Roger Rogoff was fired, and specified that about half of the missing DOJ files for Epstein were deposited at Jeanne Pirro's U.S. Attorney Office in Seattle, now under threat if someone willing to be a true oathkeeper was in charge of our materials. That would be devasting to the legal credibility of the usurped executive and ALL of their appointments, including but not limited to Aileen Cannon's, her intent to unlawfully seal our Editor Brady evidence of his entrapment and videotaped torture by Epstein's RICO obstructors at Sacramento Police and Sacramento Sheriff, but not at all limited to the same.
And part of what we let people know about yesterday, was that one of the conspirators we brought evidence against, Kaiser Permanente -- who now the DOJ files along with our files (public reporting of how government contracting funds have flowed through Epstein's Edge Foundation's billionaires' network -- have proven comixed finances with Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking ring, Epstein's Roche being the "hub" for the medical conspirators, in the context Roche is one of the many organizations Epstein laundered his child sex trafficking funds through, by at least 2003 per DOJ files.
Kaiser has played a key role in the enormous harm to our Editor, in different ways, including but not limited to the following.
Like any victim of Epstein being stalked, harassed, threatened, retaliated against, entrapped, defamed online and in print, blacklisted, and/or RICO obstructed, the same caused enormous harm to victims. That harm was economic, it was reputational, and it was emotional.
The Wigador, Bloom, and Edwards-based lawsuits against Trump, Leon Black, and Epstein all revealed the same pattern our Editor faced -- threats of harm, death, entrapment, interference with economic activity, threats to stalk and/or harm family members, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress, and/or the ruining of lives, including by defamation -- if Epstein victims sought justice for the harm against them.
This is exactly the conduct we and our Editor were subjected to for 24 years, documented, and serial whistleblew since 2002, only resulting in an escalation of the same behaviors, including under color of law in SB2 gangs in California, which is why we drove our matter to WA, because Northern CA law enforcement has been largely compromised by Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate in a provable manner, which we shared with the DOJ in 2024, who has been RICO obstructing the same in conspiracy with Aileen Cannon, Clarence Thomas, and/or others in a manner we will gladly prove to any court or Congress, but for the RICO obstruction preventing us.
Accordingly, as victims of human rights violations (one of three reasons Trump wants to abandon ICC, due to Epstein's Russia and Israel warrants being directly linked to the infamous Trump Tower "adoptions trafficking" and "sanctions" meeting 2016, followed by war crimes meant to distract/RICO obstruct Trump's and their exposed crimes, are the other two reasonable inferences) -- and as victims of deprivation of rights under color of law due to enormous SB2 gang activity in CA requiring CA to pass laws for police gangs (is how badly corrupted law enforcement is in CA, that Congress felt obliged to pass laws to identify and remove the same from harming the public) -- and as our Editor was a victim of color under law-sexual violence and torture (which bound from behind) which was videotaped -- and as our Editor was the victim of defamation, blacklisting (confirmed by a vendor for the State of CA paid by Department of Rehabilitation), stalking, and death threats for 24 years -- all of the same very reasonably was going to intentionally and severely harm him emotionally, financially, and otherwise, as well as stalked and/or harmed his whole family for almost all of his adult life.
That level of harm for 24 years, including by corrupted law enforcement protecting treasonous child sex traffickers stealing elections to RICO obstruct the same, very reasonably required access to mental health services, to navigate a level of harm few people have had to endure.
There was no playbook on how recognize Epstein's crime syndicate, how to identify who his conspirators were, and how to navigate this level of harm, and so to mitigate the harm Epstein's crime syndicate could do onto our Editor, he accessed Kaiser Permanente for help, skills, and other resources, including mandated reporting, but they failed across the board, often causing him more harm than actually helping him. And now with the DOJ revelations that Kaiser's finances were tied to Epstein's through Roche and government contracting funds, their intent to harm was resolved.
Part of the harm they engineered to help Epstein's Roche and others RICO obstruct, was Dr. Maria Caparas of Kaiser retroactively discrediting our Editor with grossly false defamations, which she covertly snuck into our Editor's medical record -- without ever bringing up the same with him as a prognosis needing diagnosis nor did she ever treat him for what she slipped into the record.
Specifically, she retroactively slipped into the record that he was possibly schizophrenic, which is a serious and defamatory accusation she secretly slipped into his records, never brought up with him, and never treated him for, and which he found later as he compiled other evidence against Kaiser for the government, having ordered all of his medical records from Kaiser, when he found the same.
Arguably, schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder, and would affect the credibility of our Editor as he wrote a biblical lawsuit against Kaiser, which most people would not be able to do, even if they didn't have schizophrenia. Our Editor has 3 university degrees, and most of America has struggled to complete a single university degree. Our Editor has published hundreds of articles, been a serial business owner, he's been a graduate business professor and law student, and a professor that was singled out from tens of thousands of University of Phoenix professors, not once, not twice, but three times, between 2010-2016. He was hand-picked to lead 20 other university professors with higher degrees than his MBA to develop 40 different products for the university. He has been granted 5 patents, which collectively solve 30 major world issues. He was hand-picked by Stanford University School of Medicine to intern at the Medical School based on him developing one of the most sophisticated human medical research protocol ever at that time, with doctors asking him to teach them about the protocol, and also the molecular biology and genetics behind the protocol. These are not the characteristics associated with a person with schizophrenia, and AI agrees wholeheartedly, specifying our Editor was the very harmful target of one of the greatest abuses or weaponization of government in its known history. And so not schizophrenic at all.
But instead, our Editor was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate, which included Kaiser's closest partners like and including Roche, and our Editor already had the evidence to prove the same when he met Dr. Caparas, at which point to rule out schizophrenia, Dr. Caparas needed to follow up with the following question, "do you have any evidence to back up your claims, as I need to differentiate between you being a victim of organized crime subjected to ongoing stalking, threats, ruin, and intentional infliction of severe emotional distress conspiracy to RICO obstruct, from someone without evidence, who doesn't have a reasonable basis for claims, to rule out schizophrenia?"
Because Dr. Caparas wasn't interested in elucidating if our Editor had a factual basis, and he can still prove he did, she had no reasonable basis to secretly and without telling him, sneak schizophrenia into his record, and then never let him know about the same, and she never treated him for the same, seems like medical fraud and malpractice, coupled to defamation, which of course only further harmed our Editor, and may now be RICO obstructing him.
And when he let Dr. Caparas know who was involved, thereafter she secretly slipped in a defamatory prognosis into his record to discredit him if his investigations ever came forward is a very reasonable inference, coupled to the fact that a team member from Epstein's and Edge Foundation-linked Stanford, who had worked with our Editor, had joined Caparas' team.
Connecting the same to Trump's stolen documents is super easy here -- cue Trump's "Beautiful Mind" boxes housing the stolen documents -- Mark Meadows allegedly stole the Crossfire Hurricane binder (which contained our Editor's GOP-entrapped investigation is a reasonable inference), and this along with other top secret government documents were stolen by Trump and concealed at Mar-a-lago, and among the stolen documents Trump literally carried around with him so that no one else could gain access (our files revealed/proposed Trump was never actually president as a matter of fact and law) resulting in Trump being raided.
The Beautiful Mind is a film involving Russell Crowe who plays a character precisely describing our Editor's situation here. He was a graduate student (law school) who later became a university professor (working for Epstein's Leon Black) who elucidated a Russian conspiracy (now provably Epstein led) against the United States, who then tried to convince the government of that conspiracy, but was discredited as a schizophrenic, directly ties Trump's stolen documents to our Editor's life, in a manner Trump recognized was similar to the Russell Crowe film, and bridging the defamation of Dr. Caparas used to later RICO obstruct for Trump, is a very reasonable inference. B
ut these aren't loose connections, because our Editor can implicate these same folks and organizations all sorts of different ways, including financially, and did in 2024 to the DOJ, and so all of this is not based on similarly to a film title alone, which is circumstantial, but compelling nonetheless, and literally, as Judge Sullivan has compelled the missing Epstein files, which we just let him know yesterday where to find, and what is in those missing files.
We can prove our Editor is the original investigator in what became every Special Counsel investigation, based on the RICO obstruction of his 2013-2014 entrapped pro se qui tam materials going after Trump property tenants (Wildenstein), GOP, the Russian Federation (who had cyberattacked his investigation 10/20/2013, making him one of the first civilians to be cyberattacked by the Russians, and before Epstein likely had Ruemmler and/or others erect Rosneft sanctions, resulting in Russia pleading with Epstein to drop the Rosneft sanctions, followed by Epstein's Trump vs. Epstein's Clintons, 2016, is a reasonable inference.
In March 2023, Trump admitted to knowing of an investigation into him BEFORE he ran for office, which he linked to all his problems, including Russia, and he referred to this Trump-Russia investigation as a "witch hunt", because we had implicated hundreds of people, companies, and countries linked to Epstein's operations, which we found were likely linked to crime families gaming WWII, specifically, but not limited to the Bush, UK royal, and Wildenstein families, which our Editor argued resulted in an ongoing conspiracy by these families to harm the United States from WWII through to our Editor's situation, overtly furthering harm from WWII and beforehand to the experience of our Editor.
And so why go there? Because as a university professor, our Editor also wanted to learn the origins, membership, tactics, and the like of Epstein's crime syndicate, studying the same. This resulted in evidence trails leading to before WWII involving the same families, and so our Editor argued on behalf of the government (until SCOTUS RICO obstructed and attacked whistleblower rule of law, born out of the first Republican administration of Abe Lincoln -- Lincoln Law) -- that an ongoing organized crime syndicate involving the same families, all linked to Epstein now, had been conspiring to harm the United States and its lawful operation of government, and violating and otherwise defended by a priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis.
Except, when Trump admitted to knowing about an investigation into him linked to all of the crimes he was being investigated for by March 2023 -- he specified that he knew of the same BEFORE he ran for office (as he came down the golden escalator is what he said, when he had not yet specified he was running for office, which he did shortly after coming down the esclatator) -- and yet Crossfire Hurricane would not begin for another year or so, and involved Dianne Feinstein (who our Editor had once investigated as possibly RICO obstructing, whereafter she secretly met twice with our Editor's family members, including in her office in DC, for which there is surely a public record).
And then the case was solved, because that meant that the only person investigating Trump, the GOP, Russian Federation, Epstein's Edge Foundation's billionaires super-financing Trump and/or the GOP, and/or vice versa via government contracts -- a year before Crossfire Hurricane -- was our Editor, and the GOP had entrapped him, denied him due process at almost every opportunity, including Brady evidence asked for by subpoena and motion for the same, all ignored by the all GOP cast of prosecutor and judges our Editor was "shopped" to.
Their intent? To RICO obstruct by wrongful conviction and gross violation of due process, to further discredit our Editor, in conspiracy with Caparas, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Roche, UCSF, UCD, Jackson Laboratory, East Bay Express, and/or others, almost all of whom shared government contracting funds with one another, and/or would go onto to form an organization known as Foundation Medicine with Epstein and/or others linked to them all (Gates, Nikolic, etc), and/or were almost all participants in Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation, and/or related operations linked to sex trafficking, money laundering, blackmailing, extortion, victim stalking, victim threats, victim intimidation, victim retaliation, victim harassment, and/or all the same for our Editor's established Cal OSHA whistleblower status.
And so empowered by all whistleblower laws and Lincoln Law, our Editor equipped himself with the laws he could use to protect the country. Since he was entrapped -- SCOTUS, Aileen Cannon, Betsy Devos, GOP, and/or Trump have seriously attacked the rule of law employed in that unlawfully-seized qui tam by the GOP -- in order to violate and attack the Constitution, and to conspire to deprive our Editor, the government, and harmed children justice, and permanently -- and thus by default outside of official capacity and outside of qualified immunity -- in service of enemies of the United States, overtly harming her, which our Editor defended against, until SCOTUS and Aileen Cannon RICO obstructed outside of official capacity.
This is what Aileen Cannon, Clarence Thomas, SCOTUS, DOJ, Dr. Caparas, Epstein, Trump, Black, Putin, and/or others have been RICO obstructing, outside of their official capacity, because the same is meant to conceal major threats and harm to the United States, along with our Editor's Brady evidence, along with evidence of them all largely being de facto officers behaving badly and in bad faith, which are liabilities to government too easily removed by long lists of laws, we also provided to the DOJ in 2024 -- their collective intent and meeting of the minds -- to RICO obstruct the serial 2002-2026 qui tam-based disclosures by the Editor of UPRights News, is a reasonable inference. This is also why Clarence Thomas is now circling over estople to further RICO obstruct, after Harlan Crow bribed him, but before Harlan Crow secretly met with the Editor's brother as did Bill Barr, now implicated in Epstein's crimes with Leon Black (our Editor's former employer when he wrote his qui tam against Leon Black's and Epstein's Edge Foundation billionaires on Black's computers, Bill Gates' Microsoft, and Brin and Pages' Google, all linked to Edge Foundation, and likely how they came to know they needed to entrap our Editor.
The released DOJ files prove Leon Black, Bill Gates, Bill Burns, Katherine Ruemmler, Peter Thiel, Ehud Barak, Nicholas Sarkozy (who attempted to bribe or RICO influence our Editor's father in a provable manner now with the release of the DOJ files) in a manner directly linked to billionaire Guy Wildenstein (mentioned along with his brother Alec in the Epstein files released, and the childhood friend of Sarkozy, and in his immediate political orbit, and the alleged "godfather" to Epstein's and Cambridge Analytica's UK royals, and one of the billionaires financing GW Bush into Texas politics, and a "friend" and coworker of our Editor's father in the French government, and Wildenstein is who recommended first in a chain of lawyers who defrauded our Editor to protect Epstein's Roche, when our Editor sued Roche.
Because the nature of the settlement later appeared to be hush money (but not really as our Editor had whistleblown the murder of kids to the FDA), and because the settlement value is roughly equal to what Epstein funneled into Roche, Roche's finances are comixed with Epstein, who can now be argued as the one paying that hush money to our Editor, who in law school was able to defeat the settlement agreement many different ways, because it was born out of government fraud, and our Editor was kidnapped, coerced, and/or threatened to settle by his attorneys, who conspired with Roche to RICO obstruct the murder by way of attempted NDA, but which fail due to provable fraud and coercion into the settlement, meant to cover up the murder of kids in illegal medical experiments, so an unenforceable agreement.
Our Editor was provably defrauded legally and so that is a different fraud than government fraud, and yet connected by the same "grand conspiracy", and all of the same defeats agreements in CA, as do contracts of adhesion, and where our Editor was further legally defrauded, when prior to signing the settlement agreement he demanded his own copy, his lawyers confirmed that he would receive a copy of the agreement to be able to comply to the same, followed by the attorney later claiming that our Editor was never to receive a copy of the agreement, and the agreement allegedly had all sorts of hidden terms neither the attorneys nor those he sued ever brought up, including our Editor not being able to go to work for Genentech, and so this agreement was so serious flawed as to make the same moot and unenforceable. So if the US government is being obstructed by this agreement, they shouldn't be, and have the evidence they shouldn't be, but based on different "privilege" claims we keep reading about linked to Aileen Cannon, we suspect she may be enforcing this unenforceable agreement, to RICO obstruct access to our Editor's depositions, when he again brought up the fact he thought Roche and CHORI had likely murdered kids.
What would be super interesting for any investigator, is to find out which cell phones pinged towers around Embarcadero towers in San Francisco, when and where our Editor seems to have been kidnapped in the building, not allowed to leave, didn't know how to get out, and was forced to settle in an or else manner, which involved his lawyers blindsiding him during the settlement, at one point scaring him with a boardroom full of people he did not know were there listening on to the settlement, who had been secretly invited to the settlement in another room, and our money would bet that Jeffrey Epstein, John Brockman, Maya Oeri, and/or other Edge Foundation participants were among those in that room on that day. If so, case solved and closed even further.
Our Editor thought he was being low-balled, and asked for much more during the settlement, but everyone but him agreed that this matter of him almost being killed by Roche and then fired for asking for protections was worth less $200K, and they all agreed with one another that this is all Roche needed to pay. If our Editor had not agreed, he feared he would never leave that building alive.
The whole thing smelled dangerous, based on the snake and predator look in all of their eyes coupled to half-cocked slithery smiles, but our Editor had to rely on the good faith of his attorneys, who later he found out in law school had defrauded him in a provable manner (they had him withdraw his whistleblower complaint from the Department of Labor, and his own attorneys contributed to a defamatory article in print and online against our Editor, which the lawyers concealed the existence of and their participation in, which Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo ensured would be published forever to forever harm our Editor, regardless of our Editor asking Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo to stop defaming him and to stop ruining his economic activity, but they did not, and the defamatory article is still available forever).
Later Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and the owner of Yahoo, Leon Black, would conspire to overtly further economic interference against our Editor, and so always the same people and companies conspiring to destroy our Editor became the pattern, and the DOJ files let us know why, because they were all beholden to Jeffrey Epstein, which we found out this year in the DOJ files, and yet if you check our pre-08/24-29/2024 reporting, it is clear we had already figured that out, and so the DOJ files would only fill in the blanks even more for us.
And so under all of these circumstances, there is no way that our Roche settlement agreement is properly formed, properly accepted, nor properly enforceable in any mean, except by organized crime relying on NDAs against Epstein victims in order to further national security threats to the US government(s), is a reasonable inference.
Now returning to Kaiser Permanente in 2026 - our Editor, who is middle-aged, has mysterious developed tumor after tumor, in a manner starting to look like a Litvinenko -- where he had developed 4 benign eye tumors, one ankle tumor, suspected skin cancer, and now he may have terminal breast cancer, which Epstein's Kaiser continues to refuse to diagnose.
Our Editor complained of pains in his chest, and asked for imaging, but at that time was denied, and instead he was told that the painful lumps in his chest are inflamed muscle fibers, and to wait for imaging. The lumps grew bigger and more painful and our Editor was now scared he had breast cancer and asked for imaging. The doctor felt the bumps and suspected breast tissue similar to a developing woman had formed, but then the Editor pointed out there were peripheral lumps that hurt to touch, and so the two agreed the same needed to be imagined.
The doctor put in an order for a mammogram, the standard of care for suspected breast cancer. Our Editor was told he could make an appointment and did so in person at the Lincoln facility at check in desk 104 or 105. The appointment was then disappeared from the system.
Our Editor inquired why, and was told that Lincoln facility in CA "would not perform a mammogram on a male", despite the established clinical fact that men get breast cancer too, and obviously men with breast cancer need the same sort of diagnostics and treatment as women, so that men won't be killed by breast cancer -- specifically a mammogram, and separately an ultra sound.
Roseville California, who Lincoln Radiology had deferred to and directed our Editor to, also refused to follow the doctor's order, them demanding more than one order from the doctor, who despite having the flu, continued to work from home, checking his messages, and worked with the radiology department to get them exactly what they needed.
He told our Editor to call back again for an appointment, which they refused again, because they stated on a recorded line that they would not provide males (facing possible terminal cancer) with a mammogram, and recommended labs instead, which when we checked with Claude AI, specified that labs can be used to supplement the standard of care, but can't replace the same, and AI inmplied that this was foul play and that our Editor needed to demand that the doctor's orders be followed, which Kaiser refused to follow. AI specified to file a grievance, which our Editor did.
Our Editor let the doctor know that Kaiser continued to refuse the mammogram and ultrasound ORDERS of the doctor, without any sort of reasonable basis. Several recorded calls later, Kaiser staff seemed concerned that all of this was irregular, and no one could understand why they kept denying me access to medicine, which is a human rights violation, medical fraud, and/or malpractice, and so we let Kaiser know the same in a documented manner.
We also warned Kaiser several times in a recorded manner that failing to provide access to medical care was likely going to result in legal action, and so they retaliated.
Calling yesterday for an appointment, our Editor was told he would receive a call back before 7 pm to book these appointments, and so he waited for hours and hours, and then after 6 pm, he had to call back again, now about 5-10 calls to Kaiser ALL week to book what a seasoned doctor ORDERED three times, only to be told they closed at 6 and that no one would be able to schedule an appointment until the next week. Our Editor is also a former cancer clinical trials coordinator, and knew all too well that cancers that are left too late to be diagnosed can kill people in weeks, not months or years.
So our Editor started a massive email and phone campaign with lawyers, media stars, judges, and others to let Trump-Epstein investigators and judges know that our Editor was possibly in a position where Epstein's crime syndicate was denying him access to medicine for possibly terminal cancer suspected in early June and now in August he still was being refused access to medicine, in what was looking like a criminal move by Kaiser to facilitate the murder of the Editor of UPRights News by way of medical fraud, abandonment, and/or medical malpractice, in order to RICO obstruct Congress, DOJ, DOS, judges, investigators, defendants, and plaintiffs foreseably-requiring his testimony.
And so this seasoned doctor who had put in this order and our Editor were told that he had not completed the order properly, so he resubmitted the same as they liked. He told our Editor to contact Radiology again for an appointment, for a Roseville appointment, given Lincoln would not perform the same -- and importantly -- no other imagining diagnostics was offered to our Editor from ANY Kaiser facility.
Separately, Roche and Kaiser organized (a Roche employee, Maria, who worked for Kaiser, is who recruited our Editor's then girlfriend-turned-wife to work for Kaiser) to in retrospect always have Epstein's crime syndicate in financial control of our Editor through his wife, while the likes of Edge Foundation's Microsoft, Roche, Yahoo, Google, Apollo, and their networks defame and destroy the economic activity of our Editor.
Our Editor's wife was made the supervisor of soon-to-be-if-not-already one of the largest hospitals/departments in all of the United States, and where allegedly, all of her counterparts at much smaller Kaiser hospitals are "provided teams" to do her job, and yet our Editor's wife was denied the same managing much more than smaller hospitals with teams.
Similarly, she kept letting them know about patient safety concerns and asked them to provide her help as they tasked her with training and certifying hundreds of doctors and nurses, and yet communications equations prove that anyone with more than 7 direct reports is being setup to fail by their organization, bogging them down with so many communications they can't do much else.
She has let her union representative know of this harm and asked for help, but the union has largely refused to help, and so she is paying them to defraud her -- but wait -- this same union is who also contributed to the 2004 smear article against our Editor by Epstein's Roche, UCSF, Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo -- and so full circle, the same people and organizations constantly or overtly furthering complex and comprehensive whistleblower retaliation against our Editor in order to continue to harm the American people and their government, is a reasonable inference.
So it appears that Kaiser has been setting up our Editor's wife to fail, so that they can remove her, but she is unionized, and that has stopped them from outright firing her, just like the GOP and/or others did to entrap our Editor, they seemed to be manufacturing reasons to take harmful actions against her, to harm our Editor, exacerbated she said over the last couple of years (corresponding to our Editor providing DOJ about a million pages of evidence of massive government fraud linked to Kaiser and Epstein), causing her intentional infliction of severe emotional distress, despite her whistleblowing at Kaiser, and the result has been a whole lot of harm directed at us, our Editor, his wife, and his family, by the "associates" and networks of Jeffrey Epstein's government contractor network, conspiring with RICO obstructors in government, is in part or in whole why our Editor hasn't been able to get justice.
And so a provable and unfavorable pattern of harm has been directed at our Editor and his family, in an ongoing complicated manner for 24 years, which our Editor has been untangling with his reporting.
But now he may face a death sentence because Kaiser has with no good reason refused to diagnose him since early June for what may be terminate cancer, able to kill him in weeks, them continuing to ignore three doctor's ORDERS to diagnose with mammogram and ultrasound.
And so mysterious cancer after cancer, and now abandoned by a medical provider we whistleblew against, whose intent may be a conspiracy to murder him -- to RICO obstruct him, the government, and/or murdered kids in illegal medical experiments by Epstein's government contractors comixing finances with him -- their collective intent, is a reasonable inference. Given all of this, has the Editor been Litvinenko-ed?
Here are those communications proving that this conspirator we linked to Epstein at AUSA/USAO, WA, knew of the chest pains as early as May 2026, in the context that mammogram appointments can be often scheduled and performed on the same day, and now we are in August, as a measure of the failure to provide standard of care, but now with intent towards possible attempted murder or actual murder (if the Editor dies of breast cancer because Kaiser refused to diagnose) established.
And so this early June date is now in retrospect not the earliest date the chest pain was discussed, at a much earlier appointment in the clinic (possibly May or April) is when the doctor first remarked the chest fibers were inflamed, followed by the tests that resulted in the statins, the chest pain attributed to heart and not breast health here, and so a third prognosis related to all of this -- collectively heart, inflamed breast tissue, female breast tissue proto-growth -- and now maybe breast cancer, and so all over the board for what it might be without proper imaging is a fair critic.
That's why imaging technologies and standards of care exist -- so that doctor's won't make the wrong guess as to what they can't see from the outside of the body -- denied to our Editor with all of this back context -- so that patients aren't killed by bad guesses, nor killed by intentional bad guesses coupled to failures to diagnose.
Several more phone calls to Kaiser Radiology resulted in promises that the "appointments would be booked yesterday, followed by the ultrasound scheduler at Roseville is on the other line, can she call you back when she's done? She's here until 7 pm", paraphrasing.
Followed by hours later no call back. Followed by calls after 6 pm to make sure to get those appointments in by the weekend. Followed by "our scheduler leaves at 6 so you missed her, and where Kaiser's policy for scheduler's calling back is 24 hrs they said, but on Friday told us to wait until Monday, for someone to get back to us", paraphrasing. It seems impossible that Kaiser's Roseville Radiology team doesn't know how late they are open.
These several calls to advice nurses, radiology, Kaiser, and the like are specified to be on recorded lines capturing what was said. So cancer can kill in weeks, it has been months, and still no standard of care provided, and where if our Editor does have terminal cancer that would have been treatable with early detection, by not diagnosing the same, they make have sentenced States' witnesses to death, in the context he blew the whistle against them in a manner linked to Epstein and Russia 2016, their intent to harm.
Interestingly, DOJ met minds with Kaiser here in their "someone you don't know and who doesn't care about will take care of you later ... trust us" approach, by constantly opening new criminal investigations for the same origins of the Mueller investigation over and over and over again, to keep our Editor "perpetually without" justice, by always having the matter forever under "ongoing criminal investigation", a weird type of RICO obstruction shield they have been employing to precisely not deliver justice for our Editor, just like Kaiser, "someone will provide you access to medicine, but some nebulus time later" -- and per Aileen Cannon sealing of our matter to harm the United States -- forever.
These days the same is known as "Jack Smith's Report (and/or supporting materials)", and parsed, is also known as "the grand conspiracy", but our matter has also been known as "The Origins of the Mueller Investigation", Crossfire Hurricane, and the Beautiful Mind boxes, all the same thing is what we believe we can prove.
Another provable story follows. The actual name of John Durham's investigation, "The Origins of the Mueller Investigation", was named that to covertly have William Barr and John Durham EACH threaten our Editor, because that is what our Editor had named his ongoing investigation post-entrapment, about a year before Barr and Durham came up with that same name.
And so our Editor can prove his investigation was stalked by William Barr, who has been revealed as present by Epstein and/or Leon Black's rape of (a) sex trafficking victim(s) in the DOJ files, named not once, but twice, one document specifying Barr was present as Black abused a victim, the other document specifying the abuse was rape.
All of this in the context that Bill Barr secretly met with our Editor brother in dark woods of Bohemian Grove around the same time as Mueller to John Durham's investigation.
And so John Durham had named his investigation after our Editor's months to a year after our Editor used the exact language to name the file housing his ongoing investigation, "The Origins of the Mueller Investigation", as proof of RICO obstruction, stalking, cyberstalking, harboring, witness and victim intimidation, whistleblower retaliation and RICO obstruction, tampering, and/or interference with a government investigation (our Editor's), his and their intent proven.
Last but not least, Barr interfered with the Mueller investigation, which was further limited by Jeff Session's Rod Rosenstein, in the context Sessions was also at Mayflower Hotel with Devin Nunes and Trump, for the conspiracy to overthrow the United States, in order to drop Rosneft sanctions, which DOJ files prove Epstein was asked by Russia before Trump ran for office for help evading those sanctions, but where additional research supports that Epstein may have been the one who influenced the sanctions in the first place, supported by the new DOJ files.
And so we have had enough of all of this harm for well too long, caused by the RICO corruption of our government by these criminals, and now our Editor is possibly facing imminent death and/or more entrapment, and so he has come forward AGAIN, asking Judges Bastian and Sullivan for protection from all of this, and where it is reasonable for a victim of all of this to ask for help, and where it would be unreasonable not to try and protect himself, the USA, and murdered kids in illegal medical experiments from all of the same, regardless of how ugly this is.
Having recently contacted DOJ, DOS, SOS, Congress, and judges -- whose central and ignored witness is being threatened with death (see our Terror Log) -- we welcome scrunity of our Editor and his investigation, and we welcome handfuls of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of lawsuits for anyone who cares to challenge the truth we provided to the DOJ to protect the United States, ourselves, and these murdered and/or endangered kids.
Juxtapose that with DOJ refusing to be transparent, and admitting to violating the law, in a manner judges have revealed strips Trump, Blanche, and DOJ of regularity, or judicial bias on behalf of the government, and then what you have left is the more trustworthy and regularily-established qui tam laws, including those enacted by BOTH the executive AND Congress, in a manner no judiciary like SCOTUS nor Aileen Cannon can usurp nor overreach, by unlawfully RICO-attacking Special Counsel and whistleblower authorities AFTER we published the following, their collective intent.
For context, we published this before SCOTUS fabricated retroactive immunity for the disqualified persons unlawfully appointing them (self-appointing de facto officers to regular officers in secret as their own judges for their own flawed appointments), and in 2024, we laid out many legal paths beyond impeachment that can be used to remove ANY government employee or (de facto) officer, without specified exceptions exempting SCOTUS, POTUS, Congress, because the laws we found specified ANY and EVERY person involved in the behavior we could prove they did, could most certainly be removed from office, regardless of impeachment, found to be only one tool to defend the government from such liabilities. Their panic and RICO obstructive conduct after this article speaks for itself.
We published the de facto nature of 6/9 GOP SCOTUS on February 1, 2024.
SCOTUS attacked our Editor's whistleblower authority on February 8, 2024. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se, provably retaliating against a protected whistleblower seeking justice, they did so outside of their official capacity and qualified immunity, and they did so to RICO obstruct they and Trump were only de facto officers, who could readily be removed by lower courts. Aileen Cannon has unlawfully sealed a digital copy of this document in Jack Smith Report. Anyone going into our 2023-2024 archives BEFORE we submitted to the DOJ 08/29/2024 will instantly recognize our conclusions presented to the DOJ as specifying links to Jeffrey Epstein. So where are our missing million files in the DOJ's release? Why are our files missing?
Other discredited and ignored victims and whistleblowers of Epstein and their information were found in the DOJ files -- WHY NOT OURS -- other than to cover up major crimes and threats against the government by badly behaving de factor officers concealing their de facto nature, who DON'T WANT ANYONE TO SEE what our Editor produced (10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis proving a "grand conspiracy" based on about a million pages of organized evidence, brought by the direct descendant of President John Adams)?
Trump literally flew around with our GOP-entrapped documents is how badly they needed to cover up our researched truth, compared to elements of law.
Nor can any of our matter be properly classified, said AI, because of the harm and threats to the government, and no classification may be used to cover up the crimes against us, the government, and murdered kids, and so our matter is entirely unclassifiable -- and if in ANY manner has been classified -- then those classifying the same have proven that they overtly furthered the RICO obstruction conspiracy we brought to DOJ concerning Epstein, us providing DOJ about half of the currently missing Epstein files.
The fact that our missing million pages are missing is evidence of consciousness of guilt, as was Trump's stealing of our documents proving he was never president, for example, but not limited to Prakash and Smith (2006), and coupled to Baude and Paulsen (2024), de facto doctrine, voiding doctrines, disqualification laws (and there are many that Trump satisfied, including EACH of his felony convictions, treason (affirmed by John Durahm to Congress, 2023), elections fraud (affirmed by John Durham to Congress, 2023), and remember, John Durham and Barr's conclusions here, were based on Trump-linked appointments).
So they found themselves guilty of disqualifying crimes is what they admitted to in 2023. Any evidence they are not disqualified is fruit from the poisonous trees in a grove of disqualification, a priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis. And now take a moment to understand their level of panic, and the intent behind all of their RICO obstructive conduct. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Now, in their favor -- our investigation coupled to the DOJ files that were released -- may actually be their Brady evidence, because, the collectively body of evidence, which few others have gained access to like we have, seems to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Epstein made them do it, which we didn't like elucidating, but we are advocates for the truth and transparency, not for foregone conclusions we need to massage into existence.
The record released by the DOJ proves that almost every billionaire we accused 2002-2024, was arguably blackmailed, RICO influenced, and/or threatened with death and/or ruin by Jeffrey Epstein, and we have found evidence that supports this is true for Trumps, Clinton, Vlad Putin, Russia, Rosneft, GOP, Dems, Kathy Ruemmler, Peter Thiel, Bill Gates, Leon Black, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Elon Musk, Maja and/or Reid Hoffman(n)s, and/or others. Most of these people were meeting with Epstein before and after we were entrapped, and we had accused many of them in our complaint, written on their networks' computers and networks, their clear advantage here, as we did not know of Epstein nor Leon Black, nor Edge Foundation, when we postured to sue into near oblivion their government contractors. So they protected themselves by conspiring to RICO obstruct in a "grand conspiracy", now proven by three Special Counsel, beyond a reasonable doubt.
And so our missing record becomes the crimes he blackmailed, RICO influenced, and/or threatened them to do, and we have checked the dates of their interactions, a near perfect match to our account, so it isn't like Epstein financed Roche for example in 2019 in an unrelated manner to our case. No, he funded them as we sued them for roughly that same amount they pre-determined and announced would be the settlement.
Similarly, Leon Black's and Bill Gates orbit met before and immediately before our Editor was entrapped, and each person our Editor could prove harmed him respectively, was later to be found mostly within Epstein's Edge Foundation network, subject to invoking of 5th Amendment by simple mention during a cross-examination in court or in a deposition with DOJ files -- so a possible criminal enterprise warned an attorney to a testifying client.
Our Editor wrote his 2013-2016 qui tam in part on the network of Leon Black during that period, using Bill Gates' Microsoft, at University of Phoenix, owned by Leon Black. Our Editor implicated Sacramento Police in Epstein's crimes during that period, one week before they entrapped him. Sacramento Police trained at the same facility as our Editor with access to the same computers and networks, and a week after he implicated them (provable by date stamp), he was entrapped by them, his qui tam materials seized from him, and he was denied due process in an incredible manner he can prove and that no one will acknowledge, to secure an unlawful search of his investigation into them 2015-2018, and so our Editor was neutralized in this manner, under constant threat of rearrest for anything, and they had full access to his materials right up until Durham and Barr conspired to begin the "Origins of the Mueller Investigation", which Durham admitted to Congress did prove Trump and GOP did cheat with enemies of the United States in U.S. elections -- each of which is a disqualifying crime.
This was followed by Jack Smith investigating the insurrection (a disqualifying crime acknowledged by the cowards on the Supreme Court of Colorado), sedition, espionage (arguably a disqualifying crime), stolen government documents (a disqualifying crime), concealed government documents (a disqualifying crime), destroyed government documents (a disqualifying crimes).
And so a fair question to SCOTUS or others is how many disqualifying crimes made Trump, Aileen Cannon, and at least 3 SCOTUS 'justices' qualified for office here? How many disqualifying crimes made Trump, Aileen Cannon, and at least 3 SCOTUS 'justices' de facto officers here?
And in receiving bribes, and RICO obstructing for enemies and for Epstein's many victims (SCOTUS has actually RICO obstructed justice for both paths that came after Epstein's clients, the sex trafficked complainants, and our Editor, who at almost all times separately accused the same people of different crimes now merged with the release of the DOJ files) -- and so how much of this bad behavior and bad conduct reasonably keeps these de facto officers abusing power in office, if their clear intent is to RICO obstruct major harm and threats against the United States, while dismantling our legal system, economy, social safety nets, social cohesion, environment, and military accomplishments? Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
At what point do the more than 2 million people who swore to protect us and the Constitution -- in order to receive money from the government -- begin to do the same here? And if they don't, isn't this overt furtherance of the government fraud conspiracy and RICO obstruction?
If not you, then who, and if not now, then when?
The following two diagrams correspond to our February 1, 2024 articles revealing evidence 6/9 GOP SCOTUS were badly behaving de facto officers. Seven days later they attacked our whistleblower authority to RICO obstruct our ability to let the public know they were de facto officers. And by this time, Bill Barr and Clarence Thomas briber Harland Crow and GW Bush had each met with the brother of the Editor of Uprights News, followed by Harlan Crow's bribed Clarence Thomas conspiring with Aileen Cannon to attack Special Counsel and whistleblower authorities seven days later, to bury the evidence of their de facto nature, and forever. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
