Donald Trump and/or Ghislaine Maxwell have weaponized the U.S. Coast Guard to stalk and threaten Epstein victims, to intimidate them with death threats using militarized government assets in a conspiracy with Gavin Newsom's State of California.

08/20/2026

Yesterday, we complained to the Office of the Attorney General of the United States that the government has been weaponized against Epstein victims, specifically our Editor.

Thereafter, in retaliation against victims seeking justice with the U.S. Attorney's Office, and in retaliation of protected whistleblower status, what followed was Donald Trump, Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, Pete Hegseth, GOP, U.S. Coast Guard and/or others knowingly, willingly, and intentionally weaponizing militarized aircraft operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, to stalk and threaten our Editor with death using a militarized aircraft, which we will prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

The pilot flew way off course with a militarized government asset, specifically C2701, who then flew off course in a criminal manner from the pilot's intended destination, specifically intending to land at Trump's (USA) and/or Gavin Newsom's (CA) government contractor McClellan Park.

The pilot literally flew past the airport the plane intended to land at, and then the pilot beelined for the family home of our Editor, divebombed his family's home while accelerating a militarized aircraft towards our Editor's family's home -- in order to threaten him with death is what the law says this is -- in the same manner the law recognizes that if the driver of a car swerves way off course, then accelerates a car towards a crowd of people, and then sharply turns at the last minute to not hit the crowd, is a criminal act of threats of death with a deadly weapon, specifically a vehicle, specified ChatGPT.

"California Laws on Threats with a Deadly Weapon Using a Vehicle

Penal Code § 245(a)(1)

In California, Penal Code § 245(a)(1) addresses assault with a deadly weapon, which can include a vehicle. The law states that:

• Definition: Assault with a deadly weapon occurs when someone uses a deadly weapon or force likely to produce great bodily injury against another person.
• Vehicle as a Deadly Weapon: A vehicle can be classified as a deadly weapon if it is used in a manner that is capable of causing great bodily injury or death.

Key Elements for Conviction

To secure a conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove:

• The defendant acted willfully.
• The act was likely to result in the application of force.
• The defendant had the present ability to inflict harm.
• The act was not in self-defense.

Federal Laws on Threats with a Deadly Weapon Using a Vehicle

General Federal Assault Laws

At the federal level, threats involving a vehicle can fall under various laws related to assault or attempted murder, depending on the intent and circumstances. Key points include:

• Assault: Federal laws prohibit assault that involves the use of a deadly weapon, which can include vehicles.
• Intent: The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant intended to use the vehicle to inflict harm or create fear of harm.

Relevant Federal Statutes

• 18 U.S.C. § 32: This statute addresses the destruction of vehicles and can apply if a vehicle is used to threaten or harm others.
• 18 U.S.C. § 1951: This law covers robbery and extortion, which can include threats made with a vehicle.

Summary of Legal Framework

California Penal Code § 245(a)(1)Assault with a deadly weapon, including vehiclesFederal18 U.S.C. § 32Destruction and threats involving vehiclesFederal18 U.S.C. § 1951Robbery and extortion involving threats with vehicles

Both California and federal laws take threats involving vehicles seriously, with significant penalties for violations."

The penalties that need to be applied to this pilot include 20 years of prison, said ChatGPT, is how serious this crime is, and this particular vehicle has been used this way in a manner we whistleblew to the DOJ in 2024, with our missing Epstein files from the DOJ's EFTA, so part of what the Epstein files are concealing is specifically this vehicle stalking and threatening our Editor and his family with death, and where Thompson doctrine for whistleblowers also provides the members of the family of our Editor with whistleblower protections, which were violated yesterday here, after we complained to the DOJ of weaponization of the government, giving us just cause to begin suing the government for this sort of criminal threat, for which there are severe penalties per ChatGPT.

"California

• Stalking — Penal Code § 646.9(a): generally a misdemeanor or felony. A felony conviction carries 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in state prison.
• Stalking while violating a protective order — § 646.9(b): 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison.
• Stalking with certain prior convictions — § 646.9(c): 2, 3, or 5 years in state prison. A court may also impose a protective order lasting up to 10 years. U.S. Department of Justice1
• Criminal threats — § 422: a death threat that meets the statutory requirements is a “wobbler,” meaning it may be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony. The felony range is 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years, and the misdemeanor version may carry up to 1 year in county jail. A felony § 422 conviction is generally a serious felony and can count as a “strike.” UC Santa Barbara1
• Witness or victim intimidation/dissuasion — § 136.1: if the threats were intended to prevent the whistleblower from reporting, testifying, cooperating with investigators, or performing a legal duty, additional felony charges may apply. The exact penalty depends on the subsection and whether force or threats were used; aggravated forms can carry multiple years in state prison.
• Vehicle use: merely using a vehicle does not automatically create one universal California “vehicle aggravation.” But using it to follow, surveil, block, ram, assault, or communicate an immediate threat can support separate charges—such as assault with a deadly weapon, reckless evasion, kidnapping/false imprisonment, or vehicle-code offenses—and may increase sentencing exposure.

Federal

• Interstate stalking — 18 U.S.C. § 2261A: can apply when someone crosses state lines or uses interstate facilities—such as phones, internet services, mail, or electronic communications—to stalk or intimidate. The ordinary maximum is 5 years in federal prison, plus a possible fine of up to $250,000. U.S. Department of Justice3
• Threats transmitted in interstate commerce — 18 U.S.C. § 875(c): transmitting a death or serious-injury threat through interstate communications can carry up to 5 years in prison.
• Retaliation against a witness, victim, or informant — 18 U.S.C. § 1513: retaliation involving threats, violence, or attempted killing can carry substantially higher penalties. Depending on the subsection and conduct, penalties can range from up to 1 year for some harassment/retaliation conduct, to up to 20 years for violent retaliation, and up to life imprisonment—or the death penalty in the narrowest resulting-death circumstances—if a killing occurs.
• Retaliation against a federal informant or witness: the whistleblower’s status matters. Federal jurisdiction is strongest if the person was assisting a federal investigation, prosecution, agency, inspector general, or congressional inquiry.[And our Editor did, working on Congressional, DOJ, DOS, and Special Counsel investigations into Trump, and where we can go after Trump, Blanche, and these others in state court for this ongoing retaliation spoke of the broader ongoing retaliation conspiracy, and may have to in order to get them to stop this criminal misconduct.] 

The same conduct can produce separate state and federal charges, but the actual sentence depends on the precise acts, intent, prior convictions, whether a protective order was violated, whether state lines or interstate communications were involved, whether a weapon or vehicle was used as a weapon, and whether anyone was injured."

Now the proof that this happened (again with this/these pilot(s)/vehicle) begins with a print screen of free radar available online, which finds a militarized vehicle flying directly over the home of our Editor's family of protected whistleblowers. So here the pilot isn't just stalking and violating the rights of one whistleblower but three of them in this incidence, as two others were not home, and multiply federal and CA charges by three here.

The following file proves the statistical intent of this pilot who has stalked and threatened our Editor and his family for years in this manner we will prove again was a ongoing conspiracy overtly furthered, which means we can use all the former attacks we can prove to put the criminal operator(s) here in jail for life, but to make the same stick, we'll have also go after Trump and Gavin Newsom, so they don't pardon these crimes away.

We both started this newspaper and developed this statistical intent tool for prosecutors with Claude A.I., and the idea is pretty simple. Because our Editor's family isn't located near any airports, nor between them, pilots involved in these crimes against his family absolutely have to intentionally fly way off course by more than a mile or kilometer to further this ongoing stalking and death threats conspiracy using militarized aircraft -- deadly weapons per the law. Also part of statistical intent, other than flying off course, intent can be proven if the pilot engages in this behavior more than once, specifically three times proves statistical intent beyond all doubt, again, because pilots have to intent to fly off course to further these crimes.

In our Terror Log reporting in more than one article, we do prove this particular vehicle has engaged in this criminal misconduct at least 10 times, and we don't even have to look that up, but the proof again is found across our Terror Log reporting, but only three times is required to prove statistical intent, so at least three times that, leaving ZERO doubt.

Next, the green graph below is the altitude and the yellow graph is the speed of the deadly militarized weapon, and where statistical intent is also separately and collectively proven if the pilot divebombs the home of the editor, proven below, and if the pilot accelerates the vehicle towards the home and family of our Editor, also proven below.

So intent is proven here with this single flight below per this statistical intent guide, but we confidently have more than 10 flights, proving intent beyond all reasonable doubt, and where Ghislaine Maxwell's former husband is part of Trump's U.S. Coast Guard, and a judge just ordered the release of her files, which may contain our RICO obstructed qui tam, or evidence of this conspiracy, per Ghislaine Maxwell's prison email to her sister regarding moving the extortion and blackmail materials to keep control over Leon Black or as Maxwell specified bleed him "dry" like a "spigot", in the context much of the harm we whistleblew to the DOj about Epstein revolved around our former employer, Leon Black, who visited Epstein at Zorro Ranch, followed by whistleblower retaliation in France against our Editor's family, in a manner several courts are about to blow wide open.

And so continuing to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the intent of these crimes against more than one victim, the following zoom out prove the pilot needed to fly Northwest and then directly West in order to reach MCC, Trump and/or Newsom contractor, McClellan Park (MCC), which we have linked to all sorts of criminal activity swirling around Jeffrey Epstein, and where Ghislaine Maxwell's ex-husband's U.S. Coast Guard operates out of. The pilot here is estimated to have flown 40 km off course to be able to attack our Editor, when statistical intent is provable after flying 1 km off course, so there is ZERO doubt that this particular attack against Epstein victims is criminal, and then multiply this by all of the times we documented this same pilot/vehicle involved in the same crimes and the same leaves ZERO doubt, and now it is time to sue them all to stop them, once and for all.

Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.

Here also, because this government assets is militarized, and the U.S. Coast Guard is involved with militarized operations, this becomes a violation of Posse Comitatus Act against a protected family of whistleblowers, five of them in gross violation of human rights, civil rights, and massive deprivation of rights under color of law, and where each attack like this can land criminal-behaving (also known as "criminal" across our reporting) pilots like this, stalking and threatening Epstein victims and whistleblowers with death, prison sentences beyond 20 years for each count, and this particular vehicle has been caught stalking and threatening our Editor with death for years, and was reported to at least one Biden-era Inspector General, who RICO obstructed justice for these Epstein victims, as part of a broader conspiracy by Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate to weaponize the government against Jeffrey Epstein's victims. Biden's son and Biden were involved in the coverup of Hunter Biden's crimes with a Russian and/or Ukrainian energy company, as part of the Epstein's GOP to Epstein's Democrats teeter totter control and weaponization of our government agencies against the people, specifically Epstein victims and whistleblowers.

https://www.uprightsnews.com/3317691_a-fifth-whistleblower-against-epstein-is-now-statistical-proof-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-of-intent-to-silence-epstein-whistleblowers-coupled-to-stalking-intimidation-retaliation-defamation-death-threats-and-interference-with-economic-activity-to-rico-obstruct-justice-for-epstein-s-victims

Per ChatGPT on the charges for engaging in these crimes, 

"Potential federal charges could include:

• Witness or victim tampering, 18 U.S.C. § 1512: threats, intimidation, harassment, or violence intended to prevent truthful testimony, reporting, evidence production, or cooperation in a federal matter. Depending on the subsection, penalties range from up to 1 year for certain harassment to up to 20 years for serious obstruction, including obstruction involving physical force or destruction of evidence.
• Retaliation against a witness, victim, or informant, 18 U.S.C. § 1513: can carry up to 20 years when threats or violence are used; penalties can be higher if serious bodily injury or death results.
• Obstruction of a federal proceeding, 18 U.S.C. § 1505: generally up to 5 years, or up to 8 years in certain terrorism-related cases. It requires a qualifying federal proceeding and corrupt intent. EveryCRSReport1
• Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371: requires an agreement between at least two people to commit a federal offense or defraud the United States, plus an overt act. The usual maximum is 5 years, unless the object offense is only a misdemeanor. U.S. Department of Justice1
• Federal RICO, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968: requires an “enterprise,” a pattern of at least two qualifying racketeering acts, and the required connection to interstate or foreign commerce. Stalking or threats alone do not automatically establish RICO. A criminal RICO violation can carry up to 20 years, or life if the underlying racketeering offense permits life imprisonment, plus forfeiture and fines. EveryCRSReport
• Interstate stalking or threats: crossing state lines or using interstate communications may implicate 18 U.S.C. § 2261A or § 875(c), commonly carrying up to 5 years for the basic offense.

Potential California charges could include:

• Stalking, Penal Code § 646.9: felony punishment generally 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years; violating a protective order while stalking can increase the range to 2, 3, or 4 years, with other enhanced ranges for qualifying prior convictions.
• Criminal threats, § 422: a qualifying death threat may be charged as a felony carrying 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years, or as a misdemeanor carrying up to 1 year in county jail.
• Dissuading or intimidating a witness or victim, § 136.1: threats intended to stop reporting, testimony, cooperation, or attendance can create additional felony exposure. The sentence depends on the subsection and whether force or threats were used.
• Conspiracy, § 182: California conspiracy requires an agreement and an act in furtherance. The punishment generally tracks the target offense, with additional rules for certain offenses.
• Obstruction of justice or interference with law enforcement: the applicable California section depends on whether the conduct involved a witness, evidence, an officer, a court order, or a pending proceeding.
• Vehicle-related conduct: using a vehicle to ram, assault, block, kidnap, surveil, or create an immediate danger can support separate charges such as assault with a deadly weapon, false imprisonment, reckless driving, or other offenses. Vehicle use alone is not a universal sentencing enhancement.

For “RICO to obstruct a criminal conspiracy” prosecutors would likely examine whether there was:

1. A qualifying underlying crime; (Yes, we whistleblew on Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate's contractors' fraud)
2. An agreement to commit it or obstruct an investigation; (Yes, proven in our Terror Log as a conspiracy)
3. An overt act; (Yes, proven in our Terror Log as an ongoing conspiracy)
4. A federal nexus, such as interstate communications or a federal proceeding; and (Yes, there are many here)
5. For RICO, an enterprise and a pattern of qualifying predicate acts." (Yes, we have proven an enterprise or conspiracy to retaliation against protected whistleblowers to the DOJ, and we specified this particular vehicle as stalking and threatening us with death, in 2024, and this is part of the missing million pages of Epstein evidence the DOJ is concealing and in doing so disqualifies everyone concealing the same from their public offices, for massive deprivation of rights under color of law, outside of official capacity, and outside of qualified immunity. And so now we have legal standing to immediately sue all involved in this conspiracy of Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Gavin Newsom, GOP, Democrats, McClellan Park, and/or the others the DOJ is harboring with misprision to intimidate Epstein victims, witnesses, and whistleblowers to overtly further RICO obstruction conspiracy. And we'll also be challenging any and every pardon or any other circumstance trying to justify this conduct as fruits from poisonous trees of disqualifying crimes conspiracy spokes). 

We recently put together the following organizational structure or criminal enterprise map for future prosecutors, and note that the State of California has been implicated as being involved with the financing, money laundering, whistleblower retaliation, victim stalking, threats of death, and/or RICO obstruction of justice crimes under the leadership of "pro-Epstein-billionaires" Gavin Newsom, whose ex-wife is Donald Trump Jr.'s ex-fiancé. Find a picture of them both at the bottom of this article with conspirators harming us at McClellan Park.

https://www.uprightsnews.com/epstein-s-commonwealth/3331228_uprights-news-uses-artificial-intelligence-to-produce-a-much-more-sophisticated-zorro-ranch-organizational-structure-using-the-doj-s-efta-epstein-files-which-nearly-perfectly-explains-the-missing-million-pages-we-delivered-to-the-doj-using-half-of-the-files-they-did-release

The missing Epstein files whistleblew on the conspiracy to commit government fraud furthered by government employees and government contractors linked to Epstein, Trump, and Gavin Newsom, the intent of them sending their pilots and contractors to stalk and threaten Epstein victims with death regularly, is now a reasonable inference, and explaining why CA Attorney General Rob Bonta refuses to protect us from the same, also likely beholden to Epstein's billionaires, a reasonable inference.

As who wouldn't want to protect a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who blew the whistle on all of this in 2024 to the CA and federal DOJ (whistleblowing now missing from the Epstein files), other than those actively involved in Epstein's post-death criminal conspiracy to stalk and threaten Epstein victims with death to intimidate victims and witnesses, to retaliate against protected whistleblowers, to RICO obstruct NM AG, CA, USA, Congress, Judge Bastian, Judge Sullivan, and/or Judge Williams even further)?

Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.

We have asked the DOJ and CA DOJ to protect us and they won't because they need to RICO obstruct major crimes against and by the State of CA and the US government against Epstein's victims, beholden to and comixing finances with Jeffrey Epstein's billionaires, the puppet masters of Trump and Newsom, is now a very reasonable inference.

But photos of "political whores" aren't enough to prove they are, and instead the act of selling out the State of CA and America require actual transfer of money from Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate to Trump and Newsom to argue the same. Said differently, the difference between an impeachable bribe and a campaign contribution or gift is whether or not the public official engages in or RICO obstructs major crimes against the people of CA and the American people. But surely we can't prove the same, or can we?

But wait -- we specified a conspiracy here -- and that requires proof, as not to make frivolous or delusional claims, the difference between someone who is a provable victim of civil and criminal conspiracy, versus some schizophrenic frivolous conspiracy without evidentiary basis. Here is an employee of Gavin Newsom's employee stalking and attacking our Editor's family from the same McClellan Park contractor. Note the upside-down"V" turn right before the pilot landed, where the pilot intended to land at MCC from Lake Folsom, which required a Southwest vector, but to prove intent, the pilot flew Northwest directly to the home of our Editor to overtly further this criminal conspiracy by Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate. And the pilot also circled around to do so further proving intent.

And zooming in this massive criminal conspiracy to stalk and threaten Epstein victims with deadly weapons near-daily becomes crystal clear, and yet again, our Editor's family doesn't live near any airports, nor do they live in between any local airports, and so only criminal intent brought these minds together exactly to the same coordinates, the family home of our Editor. Ugly crimes by ugly people.

Bullying research proves that these people are self-haters, and this is how they feel better about themselves, by harming others, similar to a crack addict needing constant stimulus and this is their drug, the fear and terrorism directed at others via death threats using government assets paid for by taxpayers, to deprive a family of Epstein's victims their rights under color of law.

Sadism and dark triad research goes a step further and proposes that some of these criminals are sexually aroused by harming others, which meets minds with Donald Trump, Leon Black, Jeffrey Epstein, and/or others, a reasonable inference based on the lawsuits of Wigador for Jane Doe and Lisa Bloom for Katie Johnson, who described death threats and/or threats of harm against Epstein's victims and/or against Epstein's victims' families. True here also is a reasonable inference. Note the green and yellow graphs also, the same sort of criminal misconduct, where after flying way off course, the pilot accelerated a vehicle towards the family home of our Editor, while divebombing.

And then full circle, literally and figuratively, the image at the top of the screen is Donald Trump at the same McClellan Park event with Gavin Newsome, pinning medals of 'honor' on pilots linked to the agencies weaponized against us, so bribing them, RICO influencing them, corrupting them, and/or ordering them to engaging in stalking crimes against the victims and families of victims of Jeffrey Epstein, to threaten them with death regularly, in order to intimidate them to stop their reporting of these crimes, is a reasonable inference.