08/20/2026 (Updated)
INTRODUCTION
Using Mistral A.I., we examined a very specific subset of the DOJ's EFTA half-dump of Epstein files, and then we developed an organizational chart around Edge Foundation, found in part above, and then in full below.
This organizational structure was built out of files we didn't have access to in 2024, when we provided the DOJ among the largest whistleblower retaliation complaints in U.S. history. The same was first developed while our Editor was in law school and separately while he was a graduate business professor.
The matter the DOJ accepted under camera and in writing August 29, 2024, as did the State Department, organized about a million pages of Epstein-Russia evidence over a 22 year period, organized into 3,000 evidence folders, and summarized by 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis, further reduced to single page summaries, single page diagrams, jurats, affidavits, as well as accompanied by the sworn and notarized oath of an officer, and also explaining reasonable basis, coupled to complex legal authorities.
None of that is found in the DOJ Epstein files, because someone has chosen to conceal the same, but concealing the same is grounds for immediate and permanent disqualification from public office.
CROSSFIRE HURRICANE WAS A RESPONSE TO AN ENTRAPPED WHISTLEBLOWER'S RETALIATION COMPLAINT
Our Editor is the provable original investigator of one of the largest qui tam report(s) in the U.S., in what a year later became Crossfire Hurricane (Trump admitted in March 2023 that all his problems were linked to a "witch-hunt" or investigation he knew about -- a year before Crossfire Hurricane and before he ran for office -- which was our Editor's 09/21/2014 RICO obstructed qui tam investigation, which we believe we can prove beyond all reasonable doubt).
Then the same was RICO obstructed by, and yet overlapped with, the Mueller Report (when our Editor reached out to Mueller and to SDNY), and yet again, our Editor's investigation into Epstein's crime syndicate started by January 2013, so years before Crossfire Hurricane or any of the other Special Counsel and related investigations is provable.
This made our Editor the original investigator for what became Crossfire Hurricane, which was a muted, unbalanced, and obstructive response to our Editor's RICO obstructed whistleblower lawsuit draft taken away from him by corrupted public official on 09/21/2014, who then conspired with those our Editor accused in his lawsuit draft to overthrow the 2016 elections, to RICO obstruct anyone ever finding out what our Editor was able to prove and sought to bring to court.
THE MUELLER AND DURHAM SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATIONS
Then our Editor's obstructed matter became (1) "The Origins of the Mueller Investigation" (Bill Barr and John Durham had literally and provably stolen our Editor's investigation title of our editor's investigation -- about a year later -- to RICO intimidate and obstruct our Editor, around the same time Leon Black's rape buddy, Bill Barr, the Attorney General of the United States, met with our Editor's brother in secret in the Bohemian Club forest -- violating Thompson 3rd party and whistleblower retaliation rights)
Bill Barr also quickly put a quick end to the Mueller Investigation and mischaracterized Mueller's findings, which were already compromised, as Rod Rosenstein forbade Mueller from investigating Trump, his family, their businesses, and/or others. Rosenstein had been the aide of Jeff Sessions, who was at the Mayflower Hotel with the Russians, conspiring with Trump and Epstein to have the Rosneft sanctions dropped. DOJ files now prove Russia asked Epstein to drop the sanctions, followed by an Epstein's Trump versus Epstein's Clintons election. Seth Abramson broke this story, and it is one of the most important articles ever written in U.S. history.
Trump's and Bill Barr's Special Counsel John Durham gave summer 2023 testimony to Congress, which mirrored our Editor's 2024 conclusions: Trump and GOP cheated with U.S. "enemies" to cheat in the 2016 elections -- two crimes EACH of which disqualified Trump and the GOP from future elections, immediately and forever, per Federalist Society's Baude and Paulsen (2024), coupled to Prakash an Smith (2006), but also per many other U.S. laws concerning ANY and EVERY government employee and officer -- without exceptions -- so no exceptions for POTUS, SCOTUS, Congress, nor any other employee nor officer.
We published all of that here before SCOTUS' fabricated and RICO-obstructing retroactive immunity for the disqualified people not qualified to appoint ANY of the six GOP SCOTUS 'justices' -- who thereafter, in a self-dealing manner, retroactively self-appointed themselves to SCOTUS as regular officers from their provable de facto officers behaving badly and in bad faith status -- which we published one week before they conspired to RICO obstruct the same with retroactive immunity for the people not qualified to appoint them. Check our dates relative to SCOTUS' retroactive immunity for those not qualified to appoint them here.
But wait, we also published news of disqualified appointments in 2023, so well before they ruled on the same, and the reason they ruled on the same, is now a reasonable inference, which we brought to the DOJ in 2024, which are now missing from the Epstein files.
And yet as can be verified in our 2023 and 2024 archives by selecting all and then using the find function, or by viewing the two images immediately below, is crystal clear that we made over 150 references to Epstein in our reporting in 2023 alone, and in 2024 about 87 times, and so over 200 references to Epstein missing from the DOJ files we delivered provable just here, and where we also provided copies of our articles to the DOJ, now missing from the DOJ's files, and all of this is their intent -- to coverup the conspiracy to illegitimately and illegally occupy and abuse our top public offices -- organized crime literally having overthrown our top offices, and all linked to Epstein.
This is just some of what we proved to the DOJ with 10,000 pages if IRAC legal analysis for the million pages of evidence we organized into 3000 evidence folders, but also providing them affidavits and jurats that were small, consumable, and immediately actionable, but for the ongoing conspiracy to RICO obstruct, which is why our million pages of Epstein (referenced at about 200 times across our articles BEFORE we went to the DOJ with our massive whistleblower retaliation complaint). Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Below, proof of around 200 or more Epstein references in our articles by 2023-2024, so well before anyone else has figured out Epstein was the one who rigged the 2016 elections, which is what we have proven across our reporting, to RICO obstruct his crimes against many victims, including those one could readily argue he blackmailed or extorted into running for office in an or else manner.
ONE MILLION PAGES OF EPSTEIN-RUSSIA EVIDENCE IS MISSING FROM THE DOJ EFTA FILES AFTER WE QUESTIONED THE LEGITIMACY OF SPECIFIC APPOINTMENTS AND HIGH GOVERNMENT OFFICES
It doesn't matter if anyone disagrees with the facts here or the laws here, because ultimately this is what we submitted to the DOJ in 2024, and they did accept the same, and now our files they accepted under camera and in writing, agreeing to conduit the same to other Trump investigators, is not found in the Epstein DOJ files that were released, and so we can account for an estimated 1/3 to 1/2 of ALL missing Epstein files, which is not insignificant.
All of this disqualification evidence and law was proven in the files we gave to the DOJ in 2024, who excluded our investigation they received from the Epstein files, and yet we gave them about a million pages of Epstein files.
Here we want to add that the DOJ revealed that FOUR other whistleblowers whistleblew against the exact same people as we did (Trump, Leon Black, Jeffrey Epstein, the UK royals, Jared Kushner, and/or others) for related crimes (whistleblower stalking and threats by government employees to cover up at least one other murder and financial crimes -- see our Terror Log link in our menu to find the statistical and actual proof of this stalking and threats against our Editor by government employees).
And so the DOJ knew, or should have known, that 5 whistleblowers corroborated one another against the same people, for the same sorts of crimes, and the threats against them were the same sorts of threats waged against the child sex trafficking victims of Epstein, who it turns out were attempting to sue many of the same people as the 5 whistleblowers (Trump, Leon Black, Jeffrey Epstein, the UK royals, Google, and/or others), all of them whistleblowing and suing at roughly the very same time against the very same people, then RICO obstructed by the same conspiracy and conspirators.
Here we also want to point out that the DOJ included in their Epstein files those they discredited or refused to help, and so our materials should have been found in the Epstein files, regardless if anyone agrees with the laws we and others we referenced, coupled to the evidence proving each element of law was satisfied, across 10,000 pages of legal analysis, again not insignificant.
But instead of revealing our facts and our legal narratives -- now about a million pages of our Epstein evidence is missing from the DOJ's database, and yet they received the same in 2024. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Check our article date here below -- also submitted to the DOJ -- relative to when SCOTUS decided they'd appoint 6/9 of themselves regularly and in secret to the bench (except they are only allowed to determine who is qualified at SCOTUS, and not who is disqualified from ANY office and government employment generally, and where there is a massive list of disqualification laws in the USA disqualifying ANY and EVERY person, officer, and government employee who engage in specific misconducts -- with ZERO exceptions for SCOTUS, POTUS, nor Congress, subjects of those laws, and not above the same -- is what we argued to the DOJ with the actual letter of the law).
And so SCOTUS is clearly picking and choosing which laws they'll subject themselves and the rest of Epstein's crime syndicate to in a self-dealing and corrupted manner -- which we paired to their lies during their confirmations regarding adhering to stare decisis, which they promptly attacked in a corrupt manner -- and we paired all of that with the bribery and corruption evidence circling almost every GOP SCOTUS 'justice' -- for example, but not limited to, Epstein-linked (per Mistral A.I.) Harlan Crow bribing of Epstein-linked Clarence Thomas (the Federalist Society hand-picked GOP SCOTUS, and was financed largely by Epstein-Russia conspirators and/or "associates"), and yet Thomas didn't disclose the bribes until he was caught, then Harland Crow met with our Editor's brother after bribing Clarence Thomas, whereafter Clarence Thomas and Aileen Cannon conspired to use lawfare to hide our matter from the public is provable, attacking whistleblower and Special Counsel authorities, they were disqualified from conspiring to attack is what we argued to DOJ).
SCOTUS responded to this article by fabricating laws one week later that could be twisted in such a manner as to self-appoint SCOTUS de facto officers to regular SCOTUS officers, concealing their maneuvers from Congress -- which is more or less what DOJ was accused of -- to boot Jack Smith from our case -- unlawful secret appointments proposed the pair to conceal the flaws we specified in their appointments one week before retroactive immunity for the people not qualified to appoint any of them. John Roberts passed the buck to Clarence Thomas by specifying those with the most SCOTUS seniority, specifically Thomas, could lead SCOTUS discussions. And so after we made the legal arguments SCOTUS justices weren't really SCOTUS justices, they changed the law for retroactive immunity to make themselves SCOTUS justices is a fair read, but concealed their flawed self-appointments from Congress. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
SCOTUS violated one of the oldest laws in Western culture here -- no one shall be their own judge for their own legal matters -- literally the difference between the rule of law and the rule of man -- and they chose to operate outside the rule of law here -- to self-appoint six de facto officers to SCOTUS, to thereafter attack the rule of law in the United States, to prevent the proper functioning of laws and government, well outside of official capacity in a criminal and corrupt manner -- is our researched opinion -- including but not limited to retroactive immunity for essentially themselves, Trump, and/or others, then that was coupled to the conspiracy between Aileen Cannon, Clarence Thomas, and/or Harlan Crow to attack whistleblower and Special Counsel authorities investigating our Editor's matter -- so directly RICO obstructing investigations into their own flawed appointments using lawfare or RICO obstruction to harm the U.S. government is provable. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Furthermore, the reason that Jack Smith was kicked off our stolen documents case, was because he was "not properly appointed" argued Aileen Cannon and/or Clarence Thomas, in the context Smith received our investigation, and/or DOJ agreed they would provide the same to Smith under camera and in writing on 08/24/2024 at AUSA/USAO, WA.
Except our body of evidence argued/argues that Clarence Thomas and Aileen Cannon were not properly appointed, and so two people we accused of not being properly appointed in evidence provided to Jack Smith, was ignored by them for their own legal matter, which they dismissed because Jack Smith they argued he was not properly appointed. They were not properly appointed before Smith was, and then used their improper appointments to RICO obstruct proof of their improper appointments in a self-appointing manner. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
A week later, after we published this legal perspective, the same obviously hit a nerve, as the GOP SCOTUS majority responded to our article by retroactively gifting themselves retroactive immunity for the people disqualified from appointing them.
But here is the thing, we found facts and evidence of too many disqualification laws, and which applied to EVERY and ANY government employee, officer, and the like -- not excluding POTUS nor SCOTUS nor Congress -- and why the likes of Constitutional scholars from the Federalist Society picking these six "justices" specified there was more than one way to remove such liabilities from office, beyond themselves, and beyond impeachment - Baude and Paulsen, marrying well with Prakash and Smith (2006).
And so a week after our article questioned their appointments -- when they ruled on the following, they were actually actively RICO obstructing flaws for the appointments of 6/9 SCOTUS, themselves.
And it doesn't matter if anyone agrees with us and Constitutional scholars here. The point is that the DOJ disappeared 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis and a million pages of organized evidence our Editor provided them as a whistleblower retaliation complaint -- and so even if some of that was not supported as well as our Editor thought or could prove -- this doesn't explain why our million missing pages is missing.
It isn't easy to simply lose more than one copy of million pages of evidence and 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis directed at high level officials within the Department of Justice is a fair critique. That's intentional concealment, harboring, misprision, deprivation of rights under color of law, and/or RICO obstruction is certain.
UNDER CAMERA AND IN WRITING DOJ'S AUSA/USAO IN SEATTLE, WA AGREED TO CONDUIT TO JACK SMITH
Then our investigation morphed into Special Counsel Jack Smith's stolen documents investigation (who was conduited our Editor's qui tam retaliation by AUSA/USAO, WA circa 08/29/2024, which they accepted and agreed to do under camera and in writing) -- stolen documents found in the "Beautiful Mind" boxes at Mar-a-lago, and spilling out of a bathroom closet others could access.
We believe that record supports that Mark Meadows and/or others stole the Crossfire Hurricane binder in Trump's last hours as POTUS to RICO obstruct our matter, then we believe it was stolen away to Mar-a-lago, and then flown with Trump everywhere, and now has its own room in the White House, the "Beautiful Mind" boxes room, which apparently is a sprawling project, perfectly describing what we submitted to the DOJ, and not found in the DOJ's files.
THE JANSON REPORT
Then it became the Janson Report (our Editor's 11 year investigative qui tam retaliation report against him by Jeffrey Epstein's, Trump's, and Russia's crime syndicates, which was "accepted" under camera and in writing by AUSA/USAO, WA circa 08/29/2024). DOJ agreed to "conduit" this well put together investigation to Special Counsel Jack Smith, and again all in writing and under camera, so verifiable. So where is our missing million pages of Epstein evidence?
Clarence Thomas and/or Aileen Cannon RICO-obstructed Jack Smith's and/or our investigation materials, by RICO-corruptly attacking whistleblower and Special Counsel authorities, followed by Aileen Cannon sealing these investigation materials ... forever ... but per A.I. it was both unlawful for her to seal the same, as it was unlawful for anyone to classify the same, and so quickly arriving at RICO obstruction by corrupted public offices.
Now it is has become the "Beautiful Mind" boxes room in the White House (named after our Editor's life story mirroring the film A Beautiful Mind, which closely resembles the life of Professor John Nash, who like our Editor was defamed and discredited, but unlike our Editor, couldn't prove his conspiracy against the U.S. involving Russia, which our Editor actually could and did prove -- "beyond a reasonable doubt" said Jack Smith, who was routed this investigation).
Our Editor's first giant qui tam was unlawfully taken from him by the Sacramento and CA GOP in 09/21/2014, specifically by Scott Jones et al., and then upon his entrapped arrest for a GOP-manufactured DUI -- Lev Parnas' lawyer threatened Mike Pence with this date -- specifying they knew what happened on September 21, when the stars stole something away, which was our Editor's investigation, which Trump later acknowledged in March of 2023, accidentally.
Now why would a Russian linked to Trump be threatening the Trump administration with the date of the entrapment of our Editor, who was investigating Trump, Epstein, Russia, GOP, and Edge Foundation billionaires?
Curiously, almost at the same time Edward Snowden came forward to let the public know that in Northern CA -- where we were operating, that AT&T, who we accused with Epstein, and who is found in the Epstein book of conspirators -- that AT&T was collecting data on everyone in Northern CA, and so allowed AT&T the ability to let others linked to Epstein know that we were coming after them all by January 2013, pretty much when Snowden came forward. Furthermore, Glen Greenwald elucidated that Verizon conspired to join AT&T do the same, and this was our Editor's provider at the time, when our Editor digitalized ALL of hundreds to thousands of pages of evidence using his Samsung phone connected to Verizon, connected to AT&T. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
So as we were developing the start of among the largest whistleblower retaliation complaints in U.S. history, those we were trying to whistleblow against were violating the 4th Amendment to unlawfully search and seizure the evidence and civil complain draft of our Editor, per GW Bush's Patriot Act mass surveillance program after he, John Robert, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and/or others stole the 2000 elections, followed by the 9/11 attacks linked to Epstein's Saudis and Epstein's Kissinger, followed by GW Bush's and Robert Mueller's GOP administrations covering up those terrorism crimes, while scooping up the data for everyone and anyone, only for GW Bush to personally meet and gift our Editor's brother, after our Editor implicated GW Bush in this sprawling investigation. Trump pulled a similar maneuver, where after he stole the 2016 elections, we were all enslaved for years by the shuttered COVID bioweapon program Trump started back up, including in Wuhan, China, followed by the release of the same, followed by Trump specifying everything was under control, followed by a failed pandemic response, while Trump and his family were invested in failed response. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Robert Mueller, whose office financed Jeffrey Epstein's money laundering partner, Roche (where our Editor was a Cal OSHA-established whistleblower), is who was tasked with investigating why Trump, the Russians, GOP, and/or others (Roche) conspired to overthrow the elections, despite having been a member of Trump's Doral golf club, only for Mueller to not investigate himself as among the original gangsters, and resulting in no charges against Trump, despite the evidence he joined the conspiracy with Russia. Mueller was also part of the law firm(s) representing Trump-Kushner families and/or Roche-Novartis (who we believe with AT&T paid Michael Cohen hush money payments exceeding a million dollars specifically to have Trump RICO obstruct, which he then did). Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
And in March 2023 when Trump specified that he knew of an investigation into him as he came down the golden escalators, Trump proved that our Editor could not have ever tried to influence his elections, because Trump acknowledged that he knew of our Editor's investigation ("the witch-hunt" Trump said he knew of as he came down the golden escalators) existed BEFORE Trump declared he'd run for POTUS 06/16/2015 -- declared minutes later at the bottom of the golden escalator.
But how did Trump know about our investigation and when did he learn about the same? The answer per his own statements was he learned before he ran for president, and then he ran for president. We contend that he ran for president with this knowledge to obstruct our investigation, and then, he did.
The witch-hunt Trump knew about had to be our Editor's 09/21/2014 RICO-obstructed investigation into Trump world, the Russian Federation, GOP, and Edge Foundation billionaires -- because again, Crossfire Hurricane did not begin to investigate all of this until a year later.
By this time, 2015, our Editor had been entrapped, and developed two and half years of investigations against Epstein's crime syndicate, Trump world, Russians, GOP, and Edge Foundation. This is the witch-hunt taken from us by the GOP on 09/21/2014. For future investigators, they need to find the hundred or so versions that were saved using random and different names to thwart more Russian cyberattacks after 10/20/2013, but the same became a way to prove when our Editor implicated others and for what and when, and that record is super telling.
Then Dianne Feinstein of CA, who our Editor had implicated earlier in his investigation as a possible defendant in one of the versions, circled around Crossfire Hurricane investigation, twice met with our Editor's family members, followed by Leon Black's sex trafficking rape buddy, Bill Barr, also organizing to secretly meet with our Editor's brother during Special Counsel investigations, who was also implicated. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
We also implicated the Bush family in 2014, followed by each GW Bush and Jeb EACH and separately organizing to meet with our Editor's family as he continued to implicate more and more people into Jeffrey Epstein's ongoing organized crimes. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Epstein's conspirators, including Russians, began cyberattacking and unlawfully taking "versions" of our Editor's investigation drafts (whose defendants changed over time with more evidence, adding some, dropping others in a manner that GOP "cherry picked") by at least 2013, and by 10/20/2013, our Editor's qui tam into Epstein's network was cyberattacked from the Russian Federation, followed by two Russians breaking into our Editor's office space, and literally tried to destroy copies of his investigation materials.
That 2014 investigation was about to whistleblow major fraud by Trump orbit, Leon Black, Bill Gates, Microsoft, Roche, Yahoo, Google, the Russian Federation, Russians, GOP, and/or other Edge Foundation-linked billionaires, who then seemingly and/or provably conspired to RICO obstruct our Editor's investigation, by having Epstein's Trump run for POTUS against Epstein's Clintons, to rig the 2016 elections, to RICO obstruct our Editor thereafter, but also to RICO obstruct four other whistleblowers against the same people, who were separately being sued at the same time by child sex trafficking victims -- all the same people being accused, conspiring to RICO obstruct us all. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Weeks before Alfa Bank, Trump Tower, and Spectrum Health allegedly connected servers in 2016, Russians who had been stalking our Editor for years conspired to have a Russian oligarch on Useppa Island in Florida finance our Editor's robotics company, Russians who worked for Alfa Bank. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Similarly, Epstein's Harvard University reached out to us attempting to bribe us through a different Russian oligarch. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Trump was personally implicated in our matter by 2007, as part of a sprawling ongoing whistleblower retaliation conspiracy by Epstein's orbit against our Editor to attack his gainful employment, defame him online and privately, and to engineer him as the problem to distract from their government contracting crimes linked to the death of child they needed to conceal (whistleblown to the FDA circa 2004), around the same time four other whistleblowers came forward against the same people, and around the same time child sex trafficking victims came forward to sue the same people.
We were collectively a choir of victims and whistleblowers singing loud against the same people, which the same people covered up by RICO obstruction, depriving us of our rights, and thus outside of official capacity per their oaths.
And so what started out as an employment and whistleblower retaliation dispute with Roche -- one of the companies Epstein laundered money through -- snowballed into ongoing whistleblower retaliation by Jeffrey Epstein's network of government contractors, who also committed government fraud by retaliating and stalking our Editor and his family (per Thompson whistleblower doctrine for 3rd party peripherals to whistleblowers, which SCOTUS themselves approved, and thereafter themselves violated by attacking our Editor's and Jack Smith's authorities to RICO obstruct our Editor's matter is a reasonable and/or provable inference).
That information seed -- spanning most 1st year criminal, civil, and contract laws -- is what our Editor decided to use to write as the basis for a civil complaint -- as a sort of mock trial and legal learning project turned academic and then government whistleblower project -- but then our Editor learned about qui tam law via the "Lincoln Law", and learned he could still sue Epstein's orbit, but on behalf of the government to see some justice, and so this monster exercise to learn the law turned into a monster size qui tam civil complaint draft, because our Editor was practicing legal writing for almost every law he was learning, to be able to have a familiar reference as he learned the law. That's fundamentally why his disclosure was so large, as he could prove Epstein's syndicate violated almost every law and right he was learning in law school.
And so by January 2013, as a graduate business professor and law school student, with over a decade of research experience at that point, organized to learn as much as he possibly could about all the crimes and harm directed at him and his family by Epstein's crime syndicate, to essentially learn the elements of law better, by connecting them to his experiences and evidence he had on hand, which turned out to be thousands of documents, covering most of the criminal, civil, and contract laws he was learning, which became the seed of the missing DOJ Epstein files. Then this became an academic research project written on Jeffrey Epstein's Leon Black's University of Phoenix (UOP) computers, using Jeffrey Epstein's Bill Gates' Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein's Google, and Jeffrey Epstein's AT&T, followed by Epstein, Gates, Black, Peter Thiel, Ruemmler, Bill Burns, and/or others meeting in person versus online or by phone, immediately a week before and then a week after our Editor's entrapment, which Russia's and Trump's Lev Parnas and/or Trump seemingly knew about. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
And then Special Counsel and Congressional investigations "fire-hosed" our Editor's already massive legal learning apparatus or qui tam retaliation lawsuit draft -- an information seed -- and so his massive investigative seed turned into an even much more massive investigation, a forest, which he eventually brought to the DOJ as the conspiracy spokes against him had been overtly furthered, and also subject to estoppel, RICO obstruction, and other considerations.
For example, the medical murder of a child in illegal experiments who died and was linked to Epstein was revealed in our Editor's investigation to the DOJ -- and where there is no statute of limitation for murder, which is why Aileen Cannon permanently sealed our Editor's investigation within Jack Smith's investigation and forever -- to coverup the murder and/or endangerment of little kids linked to Epstein, Trump, GOP, Russia, and others, is a reasonable inference. This is also suspected to be the reason why Trump ran for office, to RICO obstruct the same.
But there is no evidence of massive wrongdoing, when there is no evidence of massive wrongdoing.
This is their collective intent behind the 24 years of stalking and harm to our Editor and his family, for them to not be investigated for RICO-obstructing the murder and endangerment of children linked to Epstein's money laundering machine by government contractors, which we serial blew the whistle for, by 2024.
Why aren't the files linking Trump, Russia, Epstein, and the Edge Foundation billionaires to murdered and endangered children in illegal experiments, not found in the DOJ's EFTA corpus? Why would they want to hide that if they had nothing at all to do with the same? Where's that murder of children investigation gone? Why is that missing from the DOJ's database?
Check our 2023 to 2024 archives and this will prove that by the time we contacted the DOJ, we had clearly linked Trump, Russia, and Epstein together. And now the organizational structure we have developed below using the DOJ's files and forensic reports has reconstructed our investigation's defendants and further proven our case entirely different ways. So why isn't our investigation found in the DOJ files? The DOJ's other files and whistleblowers corroborated our story and the same people were accused of similar things.
Furthermore, the DOJ's release of half the files allowed us to discover something very unexpected, that Jeffrey Epstein and his crime syndicate were blackmailing, extorting, controlling, implicating, associating, leveraging, and threatening the many billionaires we could prove were harming us with with their government contracting companies.
Epstein was threatening them with death (Thiel), reputational ruin (Black, Gates, Wexner, Rothchild, Google, Elon Musk, Wildensteins, and/or royals), financial ruin (Black, Gates, Wexner, Rothchild, Roche, Google, Elon Musk, Wildensteins, Trumps/Kushners, and/or royals), and/or other non-specified but definite threats (threatening to take Ruemmler's apartment away, and when she protested, he specified he would resort to his "former ways" if she didn't, which does include a pattern of murders, now being investigated in New Mexico by actual public heroes).
This doesn't make them innocent AND this doesn't make them not worthy of being investigated and/or prosecuted, but in the strangest way softens the blow. Because I hold a gun to your head and tell you to commit a crime, are you fully responsible for that crime? Would you have committed that crime but for the threats made against you? If not, then who is responsible for your crime?
Because if they were increasingly forced to become deeper and deeper implicated in Epstein's pre-and-post-prosecution money laundering schemes post their extortion or blackmail, would they have committed as many crimes as they did without the constant threats by Epstein?
This question may be ugly to others -- but we are the Epstein victims, not most of you -- and we found this evidence, and we won't ignore the same as others have publicly urged us to in a recent lawsuit against a key minion, even if ignoring the same could harm those who harmed us more by us concealing these facts.
More accurately, Epstein victimized billionaires and non-billionaire, but differently. There is a shared victims path, no matter who wants to ignore this evidence. It doesn't mean the billionaires shouldn't be sued and prosecuted, but a deep dive into the harm against them is warranted, to see just how much crime they wanted to participate in, versus how much crime they were forced to participate in.
We have also found evidence of sex trafficking rapes in "groups", where some of those "present" like Bill Barr were implicated with the likes of Leon Black, and yet no one directly implicated Barr as being the rapist in the DOJ files, and so groups of people were "compromised" together by "criminal association engineering".
Similarly, the photos of 'prince' Andrew lurking over a young female body, below -- and a body that doesn't at all resemble the body of Kash Patel's Sarah Ferguson -- were photos taken by someone else, and in the background of the same photo, the feet of yet a fourth person.
And so group compromise occurred, with evidence of witnesses, and manufactured harmful statements across Epstein's criminal associates' communications -- "engineered" blackmail materials that likely surfaced to get others to do what Epstein asked -- or else -- the "prince Andrew treatment" said John Brockman, to be bled dry like a spigot specified Ghislaine Maxwell. Or else the Epstein and Brunel treatments of getting "suicided".
Similarly, using A.I. for the DOJ files that were released, we and others untangled a very sophisticated money laundering operation, one that included conventional and non-conventional use of billionaires' assets to launder money.
For example, the use of billionaire's fine art to launder money, as loans, in-kind trades, investment vehicles, cryptocurrency, offshore banking, and/or other ways to conceal the movement of the laundering of the funds Epstein blackmailed and extorted.
Then using investments in companies, whose founders like Peter Thiel did not seem to need, able to finance themselves, and so what appears to be "forced unnecessary investment associations" with Epstein.
Similarly, why did Elon Musk, the richest guy in the world, need 9/11's Saudis to finance Twitter?
Arguably, Musk did not need their financing if he is/was the richest guy in the world, or thereabouts.
And we know from the USVI AG investigation that Musk and Google were named and/or subpoenaed in the money laundering investigation of Leon Black and JP Morgan.
We know from the DOJ files Ruemmler was managing legal responses linked to Epstein, Leon Black, and/or Wigador child sex trafficking lawsuit(s), and/or where we believe we can prove she also managed the RICO obstruction of our matter, too close to our Editor's entrapment chronology -- and Google and then Leon Black/Apollo were named in both of these matters -- and so a clear pattern of the same people aways under investigations linked to Epstein, and the same people helping them get away with crimes against victims.
For the (9/11) Saudi investments in Twitter and in Trump and Kushner business -- enter the DOJ files, where Epstein approached Putin and/or the Saudis to let them know how to handle or control Trump and/or other U.S. billionaires.
Here it seems pretty obvious that Putin and/or the Saudis were provided blackmail or extortion materials against Trump, Kushner, Leon Black, and/or Elon Musk.
In fact, neither Putin nor MBS could contain their joy in 2018 when they exploded a "bro" handshake laughing out loud at one another -- like someone (Epstein) had just handed EACH of them the keys to America's castle, juxtaposed by super confident and sly looking Putin shaking the hand of a cowering and wimpy Trump around the same period.
And so Epstein's financial schemes are subject to so many red flags, and now others like Ron Wyden, USVI AG, and/or Capitol One have dug deep, and discovered money laundering, including by about 300 of Trump's companies.
What did Trump need 300 companies for, why not just the one?
Capitol One has the answer here and specified money laundering, which proves Trump was a victim of blackmail and/or extortion, and/or he was furthering Epstein's money laundering after Epstein's death.
Epstein and his syndicate employed a chronologically-deepening and creeping blackmail scheme, with early access to high net worth individuals as a financial advisor -- the ultimate trust position for billionaires -- and then Epstein built on that trust, then identified easy marks (Trump was arguably an easy mark, and too easily compromised, and possibly as early as 1984).
Epstein befriended lonely and/or horny billionaires (or in Trump's and Kushner's cases wannabe billionaires) -- Epstein introducing billionaires like Black to models, events, clients, employees, girls, and/or massages -- followed by secretly-recorded sexual encounters with those others (minors) recruited by Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, and/or Trump and/or their proxies (two of Trump's (ex-)wives have already been accused of either being trafficked or introduced to Trump by Epstein, and/or another was accused of being a "madam" like Maxwell, on the look out for billionaire and/or non-billionaire victims at Trump's, Brunel's, and Wexner's properties and events).
And so after 24 years of harm by these sorts of people, we knew exactly who and what to look for in the DOJ's EFTA for our matter -- and thereafter and using A.I. -- we developed this "organizational chart" of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and/or "associates", based on 24 years of research into Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise, around Edge Foundation's billionaires.
Now watch how nearly every major character for the last 10 years fits near-perfectly into this organizational chart below -- all branching from Edge Foundation -- financed by Epstein and Leon Black (our Editor's employer).
Then compare the same to the network diagrams we developed over 3 years before the Epstein files were released, found towards the bottom of this article.
It's almost exactly the same people we reported to the DOJ in 2024, and now our missing million pages of Epstein evidence are missing from the DOJ's database.
And our last three years of reporting specifies what we reported to the DOJ by 2024, and the conclusions we were coming to, and why.
Who we reported were nearly all of the same people the DOJ separately implicated as part of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate. That's another point of this article, to re-prove what we proved to the DOJ in 2024, but only using the files they released, so us proving our case two different ways, with two different bodies of evidence.
Now on a nearly daily basis -- per our Terror Log link above -- pro-billionaire Trump's subordinates and/or pro-billionaire Gavin Newsom's subordinates, stalk and threaten us with death using government assets -- also attacking our computers and communications -- because of what they know we and others will soon be able to prove, in Congress, at the DOJ, DOS, and/or in Judge E. Sullivan's and Judge Aileen Cannon's courts. Specifically, that Trump and the GOP disqualified themselves before SCOTUS immunity kicked in, and immediately, and forever, before the 2016 elections, in a manner that made them, Aileen Cannon, at least 3 SCOTUS 'justices", and/or others de facto and not regular officers.
Why would Trump and the DOJ want to hide a million pages of Epstein-Russia evidence coupled to 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis proving Trump was never the president? That would be a super weird thing to coverup if you were legitimately the president and had no legal reason to fear release of evidence to the contrary.
But if a million pages of evidence, coupled to 10,000 pages of evidence proved Trump was never the president, because he disqualified himself before the 2016 election, then that would perfectly explain why our files aren't in the EFTA corpus, despite provable evidence DOJ "accepted" the same two years earlier. They are fearing the evidence of the contrary by hiding our files from the public, and the same is proof of consciousness of guilt, or intent.
Our legal conclusions missing from the DOJ specified that Trump was never actually the President of the United States, but rather a de facto officer behaving badly, and in bad faith, who could be lawfully removed with a plethora of disqualification laws, and all of his changes to the government could be rescinded, voided, and nullified, including all of his pardons of witnesses implicating him in those disqualifying crimes, a priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
It doesn't matter now if we understood the facts and law right or wrong here. What matters is that the DOJ and DOS agreed our matter was important enough to "accept" under camera and under seal for specific investigations demanding witnesses and evidence come forward -- and other whistleblowers and victims corroborated what we were bringing forward with evidence corroborating them. And then all of this corroborated evidence was disappeared from the EFTA corpus.
To seek justice for 22 years of harm and to avoid misprision of felonies, harboring, and/or obstruction we bravely brought this matter forward to the DOJ and DOS in 2024, who have "disappeared" a million of our Epstein files from the public and from Congress and/or investigations, and who (DOJ's Blanche) have admitted to violating the law, and/or as specified by Judge Sullivan.
Now Judge E. Sullivan on Blanche, and/or Judge Williams on Maxwell, have specified that the government has lost its regularity and confidence in federal court, and/or each have demanded that Epstein files that were previously concealed, redacted, and/or sealed, must now be unsealed, unredacted, and/or revealed.
The following A.I. organizational chart was developed around the DOJ's EFTA corpus, followed by diagrams we published here before we brought the same to the DOJ.
The takeaway point here is that using the DOJ's files we didn't have access to until this year, resulted in the same sort of organizational structure, people, and organizations we had organized in 2024, before we had access to these files.
More simply, we are able to prove our case with two different datasets, and once merged, well then beyond a reasonable doubt, which is precisely why someone we know doesn't want these Epstein files merged, made available, nor unredacted.
To further drive this point home, Todd Blanche and Pam Bondi specified that there were two Eiffel Towers worth of evidence, the one they released -- and our matter -- the tower they did not release.
Their tower shakes out the following organizational structure. Ours shook out roughly the same organizational structure, people, and organizations. So each Eiffel Tower released corroborates the other Eiffel Tower, not released.
They are the same or similar stories, and that is the takeaway point, and begs the question -- why hasn't our "matching" or "corroborated" Eiffel Tower been released -- despite the orders of Congress, Judges Williams and/or Sullivan, and/or others -- other than to RICO obstruct justice for us -- other than to continuously deprive our Editor and his family's whistleblower retaliation rights as victims of crimes -- other than to continually deny us, harmed or killed kids in illegal medical experiments, and/or the U.S. government justice -- other than to behave well outside of official capacity, and thus well outside of qualified immunity? Is there any other reason?
For everyone to understand how to look at so many files, and how the different players connected -- we built this organization structure around Edge Foundation's financiers, "participants", and/or their government contracting companies, but we also built the same around their stalking and retaliation against their victims and against their protected whistleblowers, including but not limited to our Editor.
We are ready to testify to Congress, the DOJ, the DOS, and/or any others -- 100% ready to face any and all scrutiny -- with the receipts and truer narrative in hand.
We built this organizational structure with A.I., which specified it can make mistakes. Again, it doesn't have to be perfect, because it is close enough to what we submitted to the DOJ in 2024, now missing from the EFTA corpus.
Because FOUR other whistleblowers corroborated parts of our story -- as have child sex trafficking victims suing the same people named by the whistleblowers -- and then those same people were separately named by us between 2014 through to 2024 in our investigations -- and because the DOJ's own files have corroborated that these same people can be organized into the following organizational structure using the files they did release, corroborated by them -- now we have a very reasonable basis and standing here -- to ask any court, the DOJ, and Congress why our files are missing from the corpus, and to ask them, is that why we are being stalked and threatened with death almost every day by government employees, as documented in our Terror Log?
Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Below here, UOP was supposed to read University of Phoenix, owned by Leon Black's Apollo, but he may also own Universal Oil Products (UOP), or not. We have not taken a deep dive into what A.I. produced here, but it generally looks close enough to what we produced for the DOJ and DOS at first glance, and then some.
