08/12/2026 (Updated)
Using Mistral A.I., we examined a very specific subset of the DOJ's EFTA half-dump of Epstein files, and then we developed an organizational chart around Edge Foundation, found in part above, and then in full below. This organizational structure was built of files we didn't have access to in 2024, when we provided the DOJ among the largest whistleblower retaliation complaints in U.S. history. The same was developed while our Editor was in law school and separately while he was a graduate business professor.
The matter the DOJ accepted under camera and in writing August 29, 2024, as did the State Department, organized about a million pages of Epstein-Russia evidence over a 22 year period, organized into 3,000 evidence folders, and summarized by 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis, further reduced to single page summaries, single page diagrams, jurats, affidavits, as well as accompanied by the sworn and notarized oath of an officer, and also explaining reasonable basis, coupled to complex legal authorities. None of that is found in the DOJ Epstein files, because someone has chosen to conceal the same, but concealing the same is grounds for immediate and permanent disqualification from public office.
Our Editor is the provable original investigator of one of the largest qui tam report(s) in the U.S., in what a year later became Crossfire Hurricane (Trump admitted in March 2023 that all his problems were linked to a "witch-hunt" or investigation he knew about -- a year before Crossfire Hurricane and before he ran for office -- which was our Editor's 09/21/2014 RICO obstructed qui tam investigation, which we believe we can prove beyond all reasonable doubt).
Then the same was RICO obstructed by, and yet overlapping with, the Mueller Report (when our Editor reached out to Mueller and to SDNY), and yet again, our Editor's investigation into Epstein's crime syndicate started by January 2013, so years before Crossfire Hurricane or any of the other Special Counsel and related investigations.
This made our Editor the original investigator for what became Crossfire Hurricane, a muted, unbalanced, and obstructive response to our Editor's RICO obstructed whistleblower lawsuit draft taken away from him by corrupted public officials, who then conspired with those our Editor accused to overthrow the 2016 elections, to RICO obstruct anyone ever finding out what our Editor was able to prove and sought to bring to court.
Then our Editor's obstructed matter became (1) "The Origins of the Mueller Investigation" (Bill Barr and John Durham had literally and provably stolen our Editor's investigation title of our editor's investigation -- about a year later -- to RICO intimidate and obstruct our Editor, around the same time Leon Black's rape buddy, Bill Barr, the Attorney General of the United States, met with our Editor's brother in secret in the Bohemian Club forest -- violating Thompson 3rd party and whistleblower retaliation rights).
Trump's and Bill Barr's John Durham gave summer 2023 testimony to Congress, which mirrored our Editor's conclusions: Trump and GOP cheated with U.S. "enemies" to cheat in the 2016 elections -- two crimes EACH of which disqualified Trump and the GOP from future elections, immediately and forever, per Federalist Society's Baude and Paulsen (2024), coupled to Prakash an Smith (2006), but also per many other U.S. laws concerning ANY and EVERY government employee and officer -- without exceptions -- so no exceptions for POTUS, SCOTUS, Congress, nor any other employee nor officer.
We published all that before SCOTUS' fabricated and RICO-obstructing retroactive immunity for the disqualified people not qualified to appoint ALL six GOP SCOTUS 'justices' -- who thereafter, in a self-dealing manner, retroactively self-appointed themselves to SCOTUS as regular officers from their provable de facto officers behaving badly and in bad faith status -- which we published one week before they conspired to RICO obstruct the same with retroactive immunity for the people not qualified to appoint them.
All of this is proven in the files we gave to the DOJ in 2024, who excluded our investigation they received from the Epstein files, and yet we gave them about a million pages of Epstein files. Here we want to add that other whistleblowers whistleblew against the same people as we did for related crimes. Here we also want to point out that DOJ included in their Epstein files those they discredited or refused to help, and so our materials should have been found in the Epstein files, regardless if anyone agrees with the laws we references, coupled to the evidence providing each element of law was satisfied. But about a million pages of our Epstein evidence is missing from the DOJ's database, and yet they received the same in 2024. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Check the date here below relative to when SCOTUS decided they'd appoint themselves regularly and in secret to the bench (except they are only allowed to determine who is qualified at SCOTUS, and not who is disqualified from office and government employment generally).
SCOTUS violated one of the oldest laws in Western culture here -- no one shall be their own judge for their own legal matters -- literally the difference between the rule of law and the rule of man -- and they chose to operate outside the rule of law here to self-appoint six de facto officers to SCOTUS, to thereafter attack the rule of law in the United States, to prevent the proper functioning of laws and government, well outside of official capacity in a criminal and corrupt manner -- is our researched opinion -- including but not limited to retroactive immunity for essentially themselves, Trump, and/or others, then that was coupled to the conspiracy between Aileen Cannon, Clarence Thomas, and/or Harlan Crow to attack whistleblower and Special Counsel authorities investigating our Editor's matter -- so directly RICO obstructing investigations into their own flawed appointments using lawfare or RICO obstruction to harm the U.S. government is provable.
Furthermore, the reason that Jack Smith was kicked off our stolen documents case, was because he was "not properly appointed" argued Aileen Cannon and/or Clarence Thomas, in the context Smith received our investigation, and/or DOJ agreed they would provide the same to Smith under camera and in writing on 08/24/2024 at AUSA/USAO, WA.
Except our body of evidence argued/argues that Clarence Thomas and Aileen Cannon were not properly appointed, and so two people we accused of not being properly appointed in evidence provided to Jack Smith, was ignored by them for their own legal matter, which they dismissed because Jack Smith they argued he was not properly appointed. They were not properly appointed before Smith was, and then used their improper appointments to RICO obstruct proof of their improper appointments in a self-appointing manner. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
A week later, after we published this legal perspective, the same obviously hit a nerve, as the GOP SCOTUS majority responded to our article by retroactively gifting themselves retroactive immunity for the people disqualified from appointing them.
But here is the thing, we found facts and evidence of too many disqualification laws, and which applied to EVERY and ANY government employee, officer, and the like -- not excluding POTUS nor SCOTUS nor Congress -- and why the likes of Constitutional scholars from the Federalist Society picking these six "justices" specified there was more than one way to remove such liabilities from office, beyond themselves, and beyond impeachment - Baude and Paulsen, marrying well with Prakash and Smith (2006).
And so a week after our article questioned their appointments -- when they ruled on the following, they were actually actively RICO obstructing flaws for the appointments of 6/9 SCOTUS, themselves. And it doesn't matter if anyone agrees with us and Constitutional scholars here. The point is that the DOJ disappeared 10,000 pages if IRAC legal analysis and a million pages of organized evidence our Editor provided them as a whistleblower retaliation complaint, and so even if some of that was not supported as well as our Editor thought or could prove, this doesn't explain why our million missing pages is missing. It isn't easy to simply lose a million pages of evidence and 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis within the Department of Justice is a fair critic. That's intentional concealment, harboring, misprision, and/or RICO obstruction is certain.
Then our investigation morphed into Special Counsel Jack Smith's (who was conduited our Editor's qui tam retaliation by AUSA/USAO, WA circa 08/29/2024) stolen documents investigation, found in the "Beautiful Mind" boxes at Mar-a-lago, and spilling out of a bathroom closet others could access.
We believe that Mark Meadows stole the Crossfire Hurricane binder in Trump's last hours as POTUS to RICO obstruct our matter, then stolen away to Mar-a-lago, and then flown with Trump everywhere, and now has its own room in the White House, the "Beautiful Mind" boxes room, which apparently is a sprawling project, perfectly describing what we submitted to the DOJ, and not found in the DOJ's files.
Then it became the Janson Report (our Editor's 11 year investigative qui tam retaliation report against him by Jeffrey Epstein's, Trump's, and Russia's crime syndicates, which was "accepted" under camera and in writing by AUSA/USAO, WA circa 08/29/2024). DOJ agreed to "conduit" this well put together investigation to Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Now it is has become the "Beautiful Mind" boxes room in the White House (named after our Editor's life story mirroring the film A Beautiful Mind, which closely resembles the life of Professor John Nash, who like our Editor was defamed and discredited, but unlike our Editor, couldn't prove his conspiracy against the U.S. involving Russia, which our Editor actually could and did prove -- "beyond a reasonable doubt" said Jack Smith, who was routed this investigation).
Our Editor's first giant qui tam was unlawfully taken from him by the Sacramento and CA GOP in 09/21/2014, specifically by Scott Jones et al., and then upon his entrapped arrest for a GOP-manufactured DUI -- Lev Parnas' lawyer threatened Mike Pence with this date -- specifying they knew what happened on September 21, when the stars stole something away, which was our Editor's investigation, which Trump later acknowledged in March of 2023, accidentally.
When he did, Trump proved that our Editor could not have ever tried to influence his elections, because Trump acknowledged that he knew our Editor's investigation ("the witch-hunt" Trump said he knew of as he came down the golden escalators) existed BEFORE Trump declared he'd run for POTUS 06/16/2015 -- declared minutes later at the bottom of the golden escalator. The witch-hunt Trump knew about had to be our Editor's 09/21/2014 RICO-obstructed investigation into Trump world, the Russian Federation, GOP, and Edge Foundation billionaires -- because again, Crossfire Hurricane did not begin to investigate all of this until a year later.
By this time, 2015, our Editor had developed two and half years of investigations against Epstein's crime syndicate, Trump world, Russians, GOP, and Edge Foundation. This is the witch-hunt taken from us by the GOP on 09/21/2014.
Then Dianne Feinstein of CA, who our Editor had implicated earlier in his investigation as a possible defendant, circled around Crossfire Hurricane investigation, twice met with our Editor's family members, followed by Leon Black's sex trafficking rape buddy, Bill Barr, also organizing to secretly meet with our Editor's brother during Special Counsel investigations, who was also implicated. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
We also implicated the Bush family in 2014, followed by each GW Bush and Jeb EACH and separately organizing to meet with our Editor's family as he continued to implicate more and more people into Jeffrey Epstein's ongoing organized crimes. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Epstein's conspirators, including Russians, began cyberattacking and unlawfully taking "versions" of our Editor's investigation drafts (whose defendants changed over time with more evidence, adding some, dropping others in a manner that GOP "cherry picked") by at least 2013, and by 10/20/2013, our Editor's qui tam into Epstein's network was cyberattacked from the Russian Federation, followed by two Russians breaking into our Editor's office space, and literally tried to destroy copies of his investigation materials.
That 2014 investigation was about to whistleblow major fraud by Trump orbit, Leon Black, Bill Gates, Microsoft, Roche, Yahoo, Google, the Russian Federation, Russians, GOP, and/or other Edge Foundation-linked billionaires, who then seemingly and/or provably conspired to RICO obstruct our Editor's investigation, by having Epstein's Trump run for POTUS against Epstein's Clintons, to rig the 2016 elections, to RICO obstruct our Editor thereafter, but also to RICO obstruct four other whistleblowers against the same people, who were separately being sued at the same time by child sex trafficking victims -- all the same people being accused, conspiring to RICO obstruct us all.
Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Weeks before Alfa Bank, Trump Tower, and Spectrum Health allegedly connected servers in 2016, Russians who had been stalking our Editor for years conspired to have a Russian oligarch on Useppa Island in Florida finance our Editor's robotics company, Russians who worked for Alfa Bank. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Similarly, Epstein's Harvard University reached out to us attempting to bribe us through a different Russian oligarch. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Trump was personally implicated in our matter by 2007, as part of a sprawling ongoing whistleblower retaliation conspiracy by Epstein's orbit against our Editor to attack his gainful employment, defame him online and privately, and to engineer him as the problem to distract from their government contracting crimes linked to the death of child they needed to conceal (whistleblown to the FDA circa 2004), around the same time four other whistleblowers came forward against the same people, and around the same time child sex trafficking victims came forward to sue the same people.
We were collectively a choir of victims and whistleblowers singing loud against the same people, which the same people covered up by RICO obstruction, depriving us of our rights, and thus outside of official capacity per their oaths.
And so what started out as an employment and whistleblower retaliation dispute with Roche -- one of the companies Epstein laundered money through -- snowballed into ongoing whistleblower retaliation by Jeffrey Epstein's network of government contractors, who also committed government fraud by retaliating and stalking our Editor and his family (per Thompson whistleblower doctrine for 3rd party peripherals to whistleblowers, which SCOTUS themselves approved, and thereafter themselves violated by attacking our Editor's and Jack Smith's authorities to RICO obstruct our Editor's matter is a reasonable and/or provable inference).
That information seed -- spanning most 1st year criminal, civil, and contract laws -- is what our Editor decided to use to write as a civil complaint as a sort of mock trial learning project, but then he learned about qui tam law, and learned he could still sue but on behalf of the government to see some justice, and so this monster exercise to learn the law turned into a monster size qui tam civil complaint draft, because he was practicing legal writing for almost every law he was learning, to be able to have a familiar reference as he learned the law. That's fundamentally why his disclosure was so large, as he could prove Epstein's syndicate violated almost every law he was learning in law school.
And so by January 2013, as a graduate business professor and law school student our Editor organized to learn as much as he possibly could about all the crimes and harm directed at him and his family by Epstein's crime syndicate, to essentially learn the elements of law better, by connecting them to his experiences and evidence he had on hand, which turned out to be thousands of documents, covering most of the criminal, civil, and contract laws he was learning, which became the seed of the missing DOJ Epstein files.
And the Special Counsel and Congressional investigations "fire-hosed" our Editor's massive legal learning apparatus or qui tam retaliation lawsuit investigation draft, an information seed, and so his massive investigative seed turned into an even much more massive investigation, which he eventually brough to the DOJ as the conspiracy spokes against him had been overtly furthered, and also subject to estoppel, RICO obstruction, and other considerations -- like the medical murder of a child revealed in his investigation as linked to Epstein, and where there is no statute of limitation for murder, which is why Aileen Cannon permanently sealed our Editor's investigation within Jack Smith's investigation and forever -- to coverup the murder and/or endangerment of little kids linked to Epstein, Trump, GOP, Russia, and others, is a reasonable inference.
As there is no evidence of massive wrongdoing when there is no evidence of massive wrongdoing, was the point.
This is their collective intent behind the 24 years of stalking and harm to our Editor and his family, to not be investigated for RICO-obstructing the murder and endangerment of children linked to Epstein's money laundering machine by government contractors, which we serial blew the whistle for, by 2024.
That said, the DOJ's release of half the files allowed us to discover something very unexpected, that Jeffrey Epstein and his crime syndicate were blackmailing, extorting, controlling, implicating, associating, leveraging, and threatening the many billionaires we could prove were harming us with with their government contracting companies.
Epstein was threatening them with death (Thiel), reputational ruin (Black, Gates, Wexner, Rothchild, Google, Elon Musk, Wildensteins, and/or royals), financial ruin (Black, Gates, Wexner, Rothchild, Roche, Google, Elon Musk, Wildensteins, Trumps/Kushners, and/or royals), and/or other non-specified but definite threats (threatening to take Ruemmler's apartment away, and when she protested, he specified he would resort to his "former ways" if she didn't, which does include a pattern of murders, now being investigated in New Mexico by actual public heroes).
This doesn't make them innocent AND this doesn't make them not worthy of being prosecuted, but in the strangest way softens the blow.
Because if they were increasingly forced to become deeper and deeper implicated in Epstein's pre-and-post-prosecution money laundering schemes post their extortion or blackmail, would they have committed as many crimes as they did without the constant threats by Epstein?
This question may be ugly to others -- but we are the Epstein victims, not most of you -- and we found this evidence, and we won't ignore the same as others have publicly urged us in a recent lawsuit against a key minion, even if ignoring the same could harm those who harmed us more by us concealing these finds.
More accurately, Epstein victimized billionaires and non-billionaire, but differently. There is a shared victims path, no matter who wants to ignore this evidence. It doesn't mean the billionaires shouldn't be sued and prosecuted, but a deep dive into the harm against them is warranted, to see just how much crime they wanted to participate in, versus how much crime they were forced to participate in.
We have also found evidence of sex trafficking rapes in "groups", where some of those "present" like Bill Barr were implicated with the likes of Leon Black, and yet no one directly implicated Barr as being the rapist in the DOJ files, and so groups of people were "compromised" together by "crimes association engineering".
Similarly, the photos of 'prince' Andrew lurking over a young female body, below -- and a body that doesn't at all resemble the body of Kash Patel's Sarah Ferguson -- were photos taken by someone else, and in the background of the same photo, the feet of yet a fourth person.
And so group compromise with evidence of witnesses and manufactured harmful statements across Epstein's criminal associates' communications, "engineered" blackmail materials that likely surfaced to get others to do what Epstein asked -- or else -- the "prince Andrew treatment" said John Brockman, to be bled dry like a spigot specified Ghislaine Maxwell.
Similarly, using A.I. for the DOJ files that were released, we and others untangled a very sophisticated money laundering operation, one that included conventional and non-conventional use of billionaires' assets to launder money.
For example, the use of billionaire's fine art to launder money, as loans, in-kind trades, investment vehicles, cryptocurrency, offshore banking, and/or other ways to conceal the movement of the laundering of the funds Epstein blackmailed and extorted.
Then using investments in companies, whose founders like Peter Thiel did not seem to need, able to finance themselves, and so what appears to be "forced unnecessary investment associations" with Epstein.
Similarly, why did Elon Musk, the richest guy in the world, need 9/11's Saudis to finance Twitter?
Arguably, Musk did not need their financing if he is/was the richest guy in the world, or thereabouts.
And we know from the USVI AG investigation that Musk and Google were named and/or subpoenaed in the money laundering investigation of Leon Black and JP Morgan.
We know from the DOJ files Ruemmler was managing legal responses linked to Epstein, Leon Black, and/or Wigador child sex trafficking lawsuit(s), but and/or where we believe we can prove she also managed the RICO obstruction of our matter -- and Google and then Leon Black/Apollo was named in both of these matters -- and so a clear pattern of the same people aways under investigations linked to Epstein, and the same people helping them get away with crimes against victims.
For the (9/11) Saudi investments in Twitter and in Trump and Kushner business -- enter the DOJ files, where Epstein approached Putin and/or the Saudis to let them know how to handle or control Trump and/or other U.S. billionaires.
Here it seems pretty obvious that Putin and/or the Saudis were provided blackmail or extortion materials against Trump, Kushner, Leon Black, and/or Elon Musk. In fact, neither Putin nor MBS could contain their joy in 2018 when they exploded a "bro" handshake with such large smiles on their face -- like someone (Epstein) had just handed EACH of them the keys to America's castle, juxtaposed by super confident and sly looking Putin shaking the hand of a cowering and wimpy Trump around the same period.
And so Epstein's financial schemes are so subject to so many red flags, and now others like Ron Wyden, USVI AG, and/or Capitol One have dug deep, and discovered money laundering, including by about 300 of Trump's companies.
What did Trump need 300 companies for, why not just the one?
Capitol One has the answer here and specified money laundering, which proves Trump was a victim of blackmail and/or extortion, and/or he was furthering Epstein's money laundering after Epstein's death.
Epstein and his syndicate employed a chronologically-deepening and creeping blackmail scheme, with early access to high net worth individuals as a financial advisor -- the ultimate trust position for billionaires -- and then Epstein built on that trust, then identified easy marks (Trump was arguably an easy mark, and too easily compromised, and possibly as early as 1984).
Epstein befriended lonely and/or horny billionaires (or in Trump's and Kushner's cases wannabe billionaires), Epstein introducing billionaires like Black to models, events, clients, employees, girls, and/or massages, followed by secretly-recorded sexual encounters with those others recruited by Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, and/or Trump and/or their proxies (two of Trump's (ex-)wives have already been accused of either being trafficked or introduced to Trump by Epstein, and/or another was accused of being a "madam" like Maxwell, on the look out for billionaire and/or non-billionaire victims at Trump's, Brunel's, and Wexner's properties and events).
And so after 24 years of harm by these sorts of people, we knew exactly who and what to look for in the DOJ's EFTA for our matter -- and thereafter and using A.I. -- we developed this "organizational chart" of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and/or "associates", based on 24 years of research into Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise, around Edge Foundation's billionaires.
Now watch how nearly every major character for the last 10 years fits near-perfectly into this organizational chart below -- all branching from Edge Foundation -- financed by Epstein and Leon Black (our Editor's employer).
Then compare the same to the network diagrams we developed over 3 years before the Epstein files were released, found towards the bottom of this article.
It's almost exactly the same people we reported to the DOJ in 2024, and now our missing million pages of Epstein evidence are missing from the DOJ's database.
And our last three years of reporting specifies what we reported to the DOJ by 2024, and the conclusions we were coming to and why.
Who we reported were nearly all of the same people the DOJ separately implicated as part of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate. That's the point of this article, to re-prove what we proved to the DOJ in 2024, but only using the files they released, so us proving our case two different ways, with two different bodies of evidence.
Now on a nearly daily basis -- per our Terror Log link above -- pro-billionaire Trump's subordinates and/or pro-billionaire Gavin Newsom's subordinates, stalk and threaten us with death using government assets, also attacking our computers and communications, because of what they know we and others will soon be able to prove, in Judge E. Sullivan's and Judge Aileen Cannon's courts. That Trump and the GOP disqualified themselves before SCOTUS immunity kicked in, and immediately, and forever, before the 2016 elections.
Why would Trump and the DOJ want to hide a million pages of Epstein-Russia evidence coupled to 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis proving Trump was never the president? That would be a super weird thing to coverup if you were legitimately the president and had no legal reason to fear release of evidence to the contrary.
But if a million pages of evidence, coupled to 10,000 pages of evidence proved he was never the president, because he disqualified himself before the 2016 election, then that would perfectly explain why our files aren't in the EFTA corpus, despite provable evidence DOJ "accepted" the same two years earlier.
Our legal conclusions missing from the DOJ specified that Trump was never actually the President of the United States, but rather a de facto officer behaving badly, and in bad faith, who could be lawfully removed with a plethora of disqualification laws, and all of his changes to the government could be rescinded, voided, and nullified, including all of his pardons of witnesses implicating him in those disqualifying crimes, a priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
It doesn't matter now if we understood the facts and law right or wrong here. What matters is that the DOJ and DOS agreed our matter was important enough to "accept" under camera and under seal for specific investigations demanding witnesses and evidence come forward.
To seek justice for 22 years of harm and to avoid misprision of felonies, harboring, and/or obstruction we bravely brought this matter forward to the DOJ and DOS in 2024, who have "disappeared" a million of our Epstein files from the public and from Congress and/or investigations, and who (DOJ's Blanche) have admitted to violating the law, and/or as specified by Judge Sullivan.
Now Judge E. Sullivan on Blanche, and/or Judge Williams on Maxwell, have specified that the government has lost its regularity and confidence in federal court, and/or each have demanded that Epstein files that were previously concealed, redacted, and/or sealed, must now be unsealed, unredacted, and/or revealed.
The following A.I. organizational chart developed around the DOJ's EFTA corpus -- along with the accompanying network diagrams that were and were not developed around the EFTA corpus that follow -- serve as joint maps for future investigators, for once all the Epstein files are released.
The takeaway point here is that using the DOJ's files we didn't have access to until this year, resulted in the same sort of organizational structure, people, and organizations we had organized in 2024, before we had access to these files.
More simply, we are able to prove our case with two different datasets, and once merged, well then beyond a reasonable doubt, which is precisely why someone we know doesn't want these Epstein files merged, made available, nor unredacted.
To further drive this point home, Todd Blanche and Pam Bondi specified that there were two Eiffel Towers worth of evidence, the one they released -- and our matter -- the tower they did not release.
Their tower shakes out the following organizational structure. Ours shook out roughly the same organizational structure, people, and organizations. So each Eiffel Tower released corroborates the other Eiffel Tower, not released.
They are the same or similar stories, and that is the takeaway point, and begs the question -- why hasn't our "matching" or "corroborated" Eiffel Tower been released -- despite the orders of Congress, Judges Williams and/or Sullivan, and/or others -- other than to RICO obstruct justice for us -- other than to continuously deprive our Editor and his family's whistleblower retaliation rights as victims of crimes -- other than to continually deny us, harmed or killed kids in illegal medical experiments, and/or the U.S. government justice -- other than to behave well outside of official capacity, and thus well outside of qualified immunity? Is there any other reason?
For everyone to understand how to look at so many files, and how the different players connected -- we built this organization structure around Edge Foundation's financiers, "participants", and/or their government contracting companies, but we also built the same around their stalking and retaliation against their victims and against their protected whistleblowers, including but not limited to our Editor.
We are ready to testify to Congress, the DOJ, the DOS, and/or any others -- 100% ready to face any and all scrutiny -- with the receipts and truer narrative in hand.
We built this organizational structure with A.I., which specified it can make mistakes. Again, it doesn't have to be perfect, because it is close enough to what we submitted to the DOJ in 2024, now missing from the EFTA corpus.
Because FOUR other whistleblowers corroborated parts of our story -- as have child sex trafficking victims suing the same people named by the whistleblowers -- and then those same people were separately named by us between 2014 through to 2024 in our investigations -- and because the DOJ's own files have corroborated that these same people can be organized into the following organizational structure using the files they did release, corroborated by them -- now we have a very reasonable basis and standing here -- to ask any court, the DOJ, and Congress why our files are missing from the corpus, and to ask them, is that why we are being stalked and threatened with death almost every day by government employees, as documented in our Terror Log?
Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.
Below here, UOP was supposed to read University of Phoenix, owned by Leon Black's Apollo, but he may also own Universal Oil Products (UOP), or not. We have not taken a deep dive into what A.I. produced here, but it generally looks close enough to what we produced for the DOJ and DOS at first glance, and then some.
