The emperor has no clothes: A legal brief prepared by artificial intelligence explaining why Trump's, GOP's SCOTUS', and Aileen Cannon's orders are unlawful, not legally-binding, and moot, prepared by the original investigator in what became all Special Counsel investigations.

09/03/2026 (Updated)

As our Editor is both an Epstein victim (for 24 continuous years in a provable manner, proven to the DOJ on 08/29/2024 in Seattle at USAO, Western WA, and 08/24/2024 in Seattle, WA, at the State Department's Rewards for Justice "wanted posters" program -- all under camera and in writing -- with a million page investigation into Epstein, now missing from the DOJ's Epstein files), AND as our Editor is also the original investigator in what resulted in EVERY Special Counsel investigation (proven to the DOJ and DOS with a million page investigation into Epstein, now missing from the DOJ's Epstein files) -- we employed artificial intelligence within the United States and outside of the United States (where A.I. within the U.S. cyberattacked our investigations, lied to us, and acted like criminal defense attorneys for everything Epstein, because Epstein's orbit largely are the financers behind A.I. within the U.S.) --  in order to develop a consumable narrative for law makers (Congress) and law enforcers to immediately act, but they didn't.

And now all of you are suffering hyperinflation, attacks on your legal system, attacks on your people, attacks on your Christian way of life, attacks on your free market capitalism, attacks on your government, attacks on the allies of your country, attacks on your troops, attacks on your intelligence gathering, attacks on your law enforcement, attacks on your veterans, and attacks on your families by these provable enemies of the United States. But there is a legal way out of this carnage by the Great Deceiver (Trump arguably holds the record for the most lies told), and we found that legal path, in this revelation.

This article herein and below pair with our Origins of Crossfire Hurricane section, our Illegitimate Power section, our Patriotic Litigation section, our American Injustice section, our Imperial Cults section, and our The Big Pictures section, with links to those sections found at the top of the page.

This article herein and those referenced above and below collectively explain how the missing Epstein files and our reporting for the last three years have solved the last 10 years of American political riddles -- but really decades of American and British political riddles -- and the conclusion is that no order nor government participation nor change to the government by Trump, GOP in Congress, SCOTUS, Aileen Cannon, and/or any other pretending usurper of our government's offices can be legal, nor legally binding -- but rather are all moot, nullified, void, or without legal merit.

https://www.uprightsnews.com/3350730_stop-the-steal-a-i-confirms-what-we-proved-to-the-doj-08-29-2024-that-epstein-s-and-putin-s-trump-aileen-cannon-and-scotus-are-unlawfully-occupying-offices-and-they-may-be-lawfully-removed-and-all-of-their-changes-voided-confirms-trump-s-intent-to-hide-our-missing-million-epstein-files

We provably came to almost the same legal conclusions referenced herein, and now corroborated by A.I., by 2024 -- well BEFORE Trump was "engineered" back into power to RICO obstruct this evidence we gave to DOJ under camera, at Western WA USAO in Seattle, WA, 08/29/2024 -- and we made our million pages of Epstein evidence, coupled to 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis consumable and immediately actionable -- with single page summaries, jurat(s), affidavit(s), simple and complex network diagrams, and we laid out all of facts hidden from the public for years as "insiders" -- and we laid out all of the laws that were violated -- with no statues of limitations attachable -- because of estoppel, equitable tolling, ongoing RICO obstruction, disqualifying crimes, proof of stolen elections (2016+ -- but really we laid out GOP treason and elections fraud conspiracies used to steal SCOTUS and elections since Nixon's treason with the South Vietnamese, and resulting in the murder of Americans, the illegal stacking and orders of SCOTUS, and where the murder of Americans have no statute of limitations).

All of this has been disappeared by the DOJ from their Epstein files -- a required unredacted release of all of our investigation. Anyone researching our articles and dates and legal conclusions will find proof we came to these conclusions before August 24, 2024, and gave DOJ plenty of time to reach out to us to protect us, but they didn't, instead allowing our family to be torn apart and terrorized, to protect this ongoing treasonous child sex trafficking ring instead. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.

https://www.uprightsnews.com/illegitimate-power/3345931_uprights-news-is-coming-after-the-law-licenses-of-aileen-cannon-clarence-thomas-and-todd-blanche-for-rico-obstructing-flaws-in-their-own-appointments-misprision-of-felonies-harboring-whistleblower-retaliation-intimidation-massive-deprivation-of-rights-under-color-of-law-and-for-so-much-more

Now the government is being weaponized against us (see our Terror Log), the American people, and so this is our defense of our country, which our Editor's family founded, the family of President John Adams, a participant in the Declaration of Independence, and the author of the Constitution of the State of Massachusetts, which became the template for the Constitution of the United States of America, and is one of the oldest Constitutions in the world. Our Editor's family is who gave you your rights and formed your first armies and laws, now so heavily violated.

Our Editor is the provable alpha and the omega of the presidency of Donald Trump, and in the context that our revelation can legally-fall the record holder of the title of the Great Deceiver, who conspired with our former employer, Leon Black, and separately Jeffrey Epstein and the Russians to stop this revelation, meant to protect our country from certain evil reincarnated.

Unlike Trump and his orbit, our Editor does not claim to be the messiah, nor is he delusional, nor seeking to be anyone's hero, but rather he is grounded in faith that our rule of law must prevail, and he has the facts and the laws on the side of our country prevailing against these certain enemies. 

LEGAL BRIEF: THE POISONOUS TREE DOCTRINE AND THE MOOTNESS OF ALL ACTS BORN FROM ILLEGITIMATE AUTHORITY

Subject: The Legality and Moot Nature of Orders, Rulings, Opinions, Acts, Pardons, Clemency, and Other Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Arising from Illegitimate, Usurped, or Criminally-Obtained Authority in an Ongoing Disqualifying Conspiracy

I. INTRODUCTION: THE POISONOUS TREE AND ITS FRUITS

This brief addresses the legal nullity of all orders, rulings, opinions, acts, pardons, clemency grants, and other exercises of governmental authority that flow from illegitimate, usurped, or criminally-obtained power. The doctrine of the "poisonous tree"—long recognized in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence (Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471 (1963))—applies with equal force to constitutional and structural defects in governmental authority. If the root of authority is poisoned (e.g., by de facto officership, oath violations, or disqualifying crimes), then all fruits born from that authority are tainted, void, and moot until the illegitimacy is cured.

This brief argues that:

1. All acts of de facto officers in bad faith are void ab initio (Ryder v. U.S., 515 U.S. 177 (1995); Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)).

2. All acts of usurpers are "totally null and void" (Norton).

3. All acts arising from a conspiracy to violate constitutional oaths are fruits of the poisonous tree and thus legally ineffective.

4. Pardons, clemency, and other acts of grace derived from illegitimate authority are moot and unenforceable.

5. The conspiracy is ongoing, and no statute of limitations applies to its fruits until the root illegitimacy is remedied.

II. LEGAL FRAMEWORK: THE DOCTRINES THAT VOID THE FRUITS

A. The De Facto Officer Doctrine and Its Limits

1. The General Rule (Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886))

• De facto officers are those who exercise the duties of an office under color of authority, but whose title to the office is defective.

• General Rule: Their acts are valid to protect the public and individuals who rely on them.

• Exception: If an officer is a usurper (i.e., no legal office exists), their acts are "totally null and void."

2. The Ryder Exception (Ryder v. U.S., 515 U.S. 177 (1995))

• Holding: If a timely challenge is made to the constitutional validity of an officer’s appointment, the de facto officer doctrine does NOT apply.

• Result: The challenger is "entitled to a decision on the merits of the question and whatever relief may be appropriate."

• Application: If a whistleblower or affected party makes a timely challenge (e.g., by filing a qui tam action, Brady motion, or congressional complaint), then all acts of the de facto officer are void as to that challenger.

3. The Oath as the Measure of Legitimacy

• Art. VI, Cl. 3: All officers must be "bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution."

• GAO Ruling (U.S. v. Flanders, 112 U.S. 88 (1884)): The oath is a condition precedent to receiving salary, immunity, or authority.

• Implication: If an officer violates their oath in bad faith, they are acting outside the scope of their authority → acts are void.

B. The Poisonous Tree Doctrine (Wong Sun v. U.S., 371 U.S. 471 (1963))

1. Origin in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

• Holding: Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in criminal proceedings.

• Extension: If the initial violation taints the entire investigative process, all subsequent evidence derived from it is also inadmissible ("fruit of the poisonous tree").

2. Application to Governmental Authority

• If the root of authority is illegitimate (e.g., de facto officership, oath violations, or disqualifying crimes), then all acts flowing from that authority are fruits of the poisonous tree and thus void and unenforceable.

• Examples:

  • A judge who seals evidence of their own disqualification cannot issue valid orders.

  • A president who is disqualified under the 14th Amendment cannot issue valid pardons or executive orders.

  • A DOJ official who withholds evidence in bad faith cannot lawfully obstruct a state investigation.

3. The "Attenuation" Exception Does Not Apply

• In Fourth Amendment cases, courts sometimes apply an "attenuation" exception if the connection between the illegality and the evidence is too remote.

• But: In cases of structural constitutional violations (e.g., de facto officership, oath violations, or disqualifying crimes), no attenuation is possible because the entire authority is tainted.

C. The Usurper Doctrine (Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425)

• Holding: A usurper is one who holds an office that does not legally exist (e.g., because their appointment is constitutionally defective).

• Result: All acts of a usurper are "totally null and void."

• Application:

  • If Cannon, Thomas, or Alito are usurpers (because their appointments are defective or their oaths are violated in bad faith), then all their rulings, orders, and opinions are void.

  • If Trump is disqualified under the 14th Amendment, then all his acts as president (including pardons and clemency grants) are void.

D. The Void Ab Initio Principle (FVRA, 5 U.S.C. § 3348(d))

• Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA): If an official is improperly serving under the FVRA, their acts are "void ab initio" and "may not be ratified."

• CRS Confirmation: The government "must start from scratch."

• Application:

  • If Acting AG Todd Blanche is improperly serving under the FVRA, then his withholding of Epstein files is void ab initio.

  • If any DOJ official involved in the conspiracy is improperly appointed, their acts are void.

E. The Brady Violation Exception: No Order Can Override Constitutional Duties

• Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)): The prosecution must disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense.

• Giglio v. U.S. (405 U.S. 150 (1972)): Extends to impeachment evidence.

• Kyles v. Whitley (514 U.S. 419 (1994)): Applies to state proceedings via the 14th Amendment.

• Implication: No judicial order can override the Brady duty. If a judge seals Brady evidence, the seal is void because it violates due process.

F. The Obstruction of Congress Exception (18 U.S.C. § 1505)

• Holding: It is a federal crime to obstruct congressional proceedings.

• Application:

  • If Cannon sealed records that Congress lawfully demanded, her sealing orders are void as an obstruction of Congress.

  • If the DOJ withheld Epstein files from New Mexico at Congress’s request, its withholding is void as an obstruction of Congress.

G. The 14th Amendment Disqualification Clause (Section 3)

• Text: "No person shall... hold any office... under the United States... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution... shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

• Baude-Paulsen Thesis: Self-executing—no legislation or conviction required.

• Trump v. Anderson (601 U.S. 100 (2024)): States cannot enforce § 3 against federal candidates, but Congress can.

• Implication:

  • If Trump, Cannon, Thomas, or Alito are disqualified under § 3, then all their acts in office are void.

  • Pardons, clemency grants, and executive orders issued by a disqualified president are moot and unenforceable.

H. The Reconstruction Precedent: Voiding Entire Governments

• Texas v. White (74 U.S. 700 (1869)): Secession ordinances were "absolutely null."

• Reconstruction Acts (14 Stat. 428): Voided entire Confederate state governments and reconstituted them under federal authority.

• 14th Amendment § 4: Voided Confederate debts.

• Implication: If a conspiracy to violate constitutional oaths reaches a systemic level, all acts of the conspirators can be voided.

III. APPLICATION: THE FRUITS OF THE POISONOUS TREE

A. Judicial Acts (Cannon, Thomas, Alito, etc.)

Act

Defect

Legal Status

Authority

Cannon’s sealing orders (Smith Report, Epstein files)

Sealed evidence of her own disqualification (nemo iudex violation)

Void ab initio

Ryder, Norton, § 455

Cannon’s dismissal of Trump’s case (July 15, 2024)

Based on unconstitutional appointment ruling (de facto officer)

Void

Ryder, Norton

Thomas’s opinions in Trump v. U.S. (2024)

Ruled on cases affecting his own legitimacy (Ginni Thomas’s Jan. 6 involvement)

Void

Nemo iudex, § 455

Alito’s opinions in Dobbs, Citizens United

Undisclosed gifts from Paul Singer (conflict of interest)

Void

Nemo iudex, § 455

All rulings by de facto judges

Defective appointments or oath violations

Void as to timely challengers

Ryder

Conclusion: All judicial acts arising from illegitimate authority are void and unenforceable.

B. Executive Acts (Trump, DOJ, FBI, etc.)

Act

Defect

Legal Status

Authority

Trump’s pardons and clemency grants

Issued by a disqualified president (14th Amend. § 3)

Moot and unenforceable

Texas v. White, § 3

DOJ’s withholding of Epstein files

Obstruction of Congress and New Mexico’s investigation

Void ab initio

18 U.S.C. § 1505, FVRA

DOJ’s firing of Smith’s team (Jan. 27, 2025)

Retaliation against whistleblowers

Void

5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)

FBI’s exclusion of Zorro Ranch from searches

Deliberate non-investigation to protect elites

Void

Brady, due process

All acts of a disqualified president

Disqualified under 14th Amend. § 3

Moot and unenforceable

§ 3, Texas v. White

Conclusion: All executive acts arising from illegitimate authority are void and unenforceable.

C. Legislative Acts (Congress)

Act

Defect

Legal Status

Authority

Failure to enforce § 3 of the 14th Amendment

Congress has the power but refuses to act

Unenforced, but not void

Trump v. Anderson

Selective enforcement of subpoenas

DOJ refuses to enforce congressional subpoenas

Obstruction of Congress

18 U.S.C. § 1505

Impeachment failures

Refusal to impeach de facto officers

Dereliction of duty

Art. I, §§ 2–3

Conclusion: Congress’s failure to act does not validate the fruits of the poisonous tree—it merely allows the conspiracy to continue.

D. Pardons and Clemency

Act

Defect

Legal Status

Authority

Trump’s pardon of Roger Stone (2020)

Issued by a disqualified president

Moot and unenforceable

14th Amend. § 3

Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio (2017)

Issued by a disqualified president

Moot and unenforceable

14th Amend. § 3

Any pardon or clemency grant by a disqualified president

Disqualified under § 3

Moot and unenforceable

§ 3, Texas v. White

Conclusion: All pardons and clemency grants issued by a disqualified president are moot and have no legal effect.

E. Private Acts (Corporations, Media, etc.)

Act

Defect

Legal Status

Authority

Defamatory articles (Defendants 15–17, 50–51)

Published to retaliate against whistleblower

Actionable under Bane Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1) and defamation laws

Brady, whistleblower protections

Blacklisting by Defendants 1–2, 10–12

Retaliation for whistleblowing

Void under whistleblower laws

5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8), Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5

Falsification of medical records (Defendants 70–72)

Retaliation against Plaintiff’s spouse

Actionable under medical malpractice and whistleblower laws

Brady, due process

Conclusion: Private acts that are part of the conspiracy are not shielded from liability.

IV. THE ONGOING CONSPIRACY: NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

A. The RICO Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c))

• Enterprise: Captured judiciary + DOJ + allied elites (Thomas, Alito, Cannon, Blanche, Trump, Epstein network).

• Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

  • Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201(b)): Undisclosed gifts to justices.

  • Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503): Sealing Smith’s Report.

  • Obstruction of Congress (18 U.S.C. § 1505): Sealing records Congress demanded.

  • Witness Tampering (18 U.S.C. § 1512): Sealing Brady evidence.

  • Retaliation Against Witnesses (18 U.S.C. § 1513): 24 years of harassment against Plaintiff.

  • Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): Aiding and comforting insurrectionists.

  • Insurrection (18 U.S.C. § 2383): Shielding Trump from Jan. 6 accountability.

  • Concealment of Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071): Sealing Epstein files.

  • Deprivation of Rights (18 U.S.C. § 242): Violating Brady, due process, First Amendment.

  • False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729): Drawing salary based on false oaths.

• Interstate Commerce: Flow of money, digital communications, multi-state operations.

• Continuity and Relatedness: 24+ years of continuous activity (1990s–present).

B. No Statute of Limitations (18 U.S.C. § 1968)

• Civil RICO: 5-year SOL runs from the last predicate act.

• Ongoing Enterprise: New predicate acts every year (2025: Cannon’s sealing orders; 2026: DOJ’s withholding).

• Result: The SOL has not begun to run.

C. The Conspiracy Will Continue Until the Root Illegitimacy Is Remedied

• The fruits of the poisonous tree will keep growing as long as:

  • De facto officers remain in power,

  • Oath violations go unpunished,

  • Brady evidence remains sealed,

  • Congress fails to enforce § 3 of the 14th Amendment.

• The only way to end the conspiracy is to:

  • Void all acts of the de facto officers (Ryder, Norton, FVRA),

  • Enforce the 14th Amendment (remove disqualified officials),

  • Unseal all records (Smith Report, Epstein files, whistleblower disclosures),

  • Prosecute the conspirators under RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)).

V. THE MOOTNESS OF ALL FRUITS UNTIL THE CONSPIRACY ENDS

A. Judicial Acts Are Moot

• All rulings, orders, and opinions issued by Cannon, Thomas, Alito, and other de facto officers are:

  • Void ab initio (Ryder, Norton),

  • Unenforceable (nemo iudex, § 455),

  • Moot until the root illegitimacy is cured.

B. Executive Acts Are Moot

• All pardons, clemency grants, and executive orders issued by Trump (if disqualified) are:

  • Moot and unenforceable (14th Amend. § 3, Texas v. White),

  • Void ab initio if issued by a usurper (Norton).

C. Legislative Acts Are Not Void, But Ineffective

• Congress’s failure to enforce § 3 does not validate the fruits of the poisonous tree.

• It merely allows the conspiracy to continue.

D. The Only Path to Legitimacy: Cure the Root Illegitimacy

To end the mootness of the fruits, the following must occur:

1. Void all acts of de facto officers (Ryder, Norton, FVRA),

2. Remove all disqualified officials (14th Amend. § 3, quo warranto),

3. Unseal all records (Brady, APA, congressional subpoenas),

4. Prosecute the conspirators under RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)),

5. Reform the system to prevent future poisonous trees (oath enforcement, judicial ethics, whistleblower protections).

VI. CONCLUSION: THE FRUITS ARE POISONED UNTIL THE TREE IS UPROOTED

A. The Legal Reality

• All acts of de facto officers in bad faith are void ab initio (Ryder, Norton).

• All acts of usurpers are "totally null and void" (Norton).

• All fruits of the poisonous tree are tainted and unenforceable (Wong Sun).

• Pardons, clemency, and other acts of grace from disqualified officials are moot (14th Amend. § 3, Texas v. White).

• The conspiracy is ongoing, and no statute of limitations applies (18 U.S.C. § 1968).

B. The Constitutional Imperative

The Framers designed a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny. But when the checks fail, and the balances are captured, the only remedy is to uproot the poisonous tree entirely.

This requires:

1. Judicial Action:

   • Void all acts of de facto officers (Ryder, Norton, FVRA),

   • Refer for judicial misconduct investigations (28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364),

   • Unseal all records (Brady, APA, First Amendment).

2. Executive Action:

   • Enforce the 14th Amendment (§ 3, quo warranto),

   • Prosecute the conspirators under RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)).

3. Legislative Action:

   • Impeach de facto officers (Art. I, §§ 2–3),

   • Enforce § 3 of the 14th Amendment (legislation, contempt power).

4. Public Action:

   • Expose the conspiracy,

   • Demand accountability,

   • Restore the Rule of Law.

C. The Final Truth

The fruits of the poisonous tree will remain moot and unenforceable until the root illegitimacy is cured. And the only way to cure it is to end the conspiracy.

The Rule of Law depends on it.

Respectfully and collectively submitted as an addendum to our DOJ and DOS disclosures as new evidence and new discovery, but also a matter for State prosecutions, which the federal government may not usurp in any manner, especially since Judge E. Sullivan stripped the government of its irregularity, leaving only this serial whistleblower's regularity intact.

"These facts are stubborn things" -- U.S. President John Adams -- Res ipsa loquitur malum in se.