Beginning with the top story of the week, Samuel Alito was caught retaliating against his neighbor, because his neighbor was exercising his 1st Amendment to free speech.
"Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. flew an upside-down American flag at their home following a dispute with a neighbor over anti-Trump yard signs, according to a statement from the justice and interviews with neighbors."
This petty retaliation by the Alitos -- and where they flew our nation's overthrow flag upside down for days, and where Samuel Alito could have and should have defended "Old Glory", but instead blamed this childish and/or insurrectionist behavior on his wife, like a coward would -- is more than another toxic Republican ruining a community, because the overthrow flag is symbolic of the GOP's, Trumps, Russia's, the insurrectionists', the fake electors', the stolen documents thieves', and/or other enemies' ongoing intent to overthrow the United States to perpetuate an ongoing organized criminal enterprise, conspiracy, and/or cult, and to RICO obstruct justice for the same.
Other than burning an American flag, there is nothing more in American that these enemies of the United States could do than to fly the American flag upside down, because from a symbolic perspective, this represents the intent to overthrow America in an ongoing manner, and where Alito has played a central role in overthrowing America an election, crime, corrupt ruling, and RICO obstruction of justice overt furtherance at a time.
"The upside-down flag has long been used as a sign of distress as well as protest by liberals and conservatives. At the time, it had been embraced by supporters of the “Stop the Steal” movement who falsely claimed the 2020 election had been stolen from Donald Trump. Some rioters displayed it when they stormed the Capitol to disrupt the formal certification of Joe Biden’s victory.
The flying of the flag at the justice’s home, which was first reported Thursday by the New York Times, has prompted calls for Alito to recuse himself from a pair of high-profile Jan. 6-related cases that the court is set to rule on in coming weeks: whether Trump has immunity for his efforts to remain in office after losing the 2020 election, and whether it was proper for the Justice Department to use an obstruction statute to charge the more than 300 who rioted that day."
Accordingly, by flying the flag upside down, Alito proved that he is unable to regulate his emotions or his personal feelings, and that he is unable to resolve conflicts with his neighbors, much less the conflicts of the country, and that he is unable to remain a neutral arbitrator or judge of facts and laws, and that he is much more likely to rule in a partisan and unprofessional manner, well outside of the oath of his office, violated by retaliating against those exercising their rights to free speech, and by adhere to, comforting, and aiding enemies of the United States in a disqualifying manner, by RICO obstructing justice for the United States and other victims, in favor of organized crime, insurrectionists, traitors, seditionists, terrorists, elections defrauders, and child sex traffickers, as an accessories after the fact would do in violations of their oaths, duties, and employment protections.
This comes on the heels of Alito and all of the other GOP SCOTUS justices having been caught in the last year corrupting their public offices in self-dealings, corruption, bribery, and other judicial crises, where the same included those bribing and corrupting them bringing matters before SCOTUS for favorable rulings, totally discrediting the GOP SCOTUS majority, and in fact disqualifying all them in an immediate manner according to many different U.S. laws.
"The revelation that an upside-down American flag, a symbol adopted to contest Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s electoral victory, flew outside Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s house in the days after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol raised questions about whether that had violated ethics rules.
The justice has said that his wife put up the flag in response to a neighbor’s anti-Trump yard sign. It remains unclear how long the inverted flag was on display outside his residence in Virginia.
It is the most recent disclosure about the Supreme Court to fuel concerns about impartiality and the appearance of bias.
Some of those controversies have involved Justice Alito. In June, he defended his decision to accompany a conservative billionaire on a luxury fishing vacation. That billionaire later had cases before the Supreme Court. In September, Justice Alito rejected demands for recusal in a major tax case after he gave interviews to one of the lawyers involved, David Rivkin, for The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page.
Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge and the director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute, contrasted the situation with Justice Clarence Thomas and his recusal this term from an appeal involving an architect of the plan to subvert the 2020 election. Justice Thomas did not cite a reason in declining to participate in the case.
That case involved John Eastman, a former law clerk to the justice and a friend, who had asked the Supreme Court to overturn a lower-court decision that allowed a House committee to view messages he said were protected by attorney-client privilege. In that instance, Mr. Fogel explained, Justice Thomas had acted appropriately because it is improper for judges to hear cases directly involving the personal interests of family members or others with whom they have a close relationship.
However, that was the rare exception. The fact that his wife, Virginia Thomas, was actively involved in efforts to throw out the results of the 2020 election has prompted repeated calls for his recusal in related cases. He has elected to participate in nearly all.
Justice Alito has participated in cases related to the 2020 election, including three connected to Jan. 6 this term. Even though those three cases do not turn directly on the question of whether the 2020 election was stolen, recusal would be more about avoiding an appearance of a conflict: None of the cases would be before the court if not for the Jan. 6 attack and the attempts to overturn the election.
Earlier this term, the Supreme Court announced an ethics code — a first for the court.
Under those guidelines, justices are encouraged to avoid even the appearance of bias. Legal experts say that displaying an upside-down flag would likely violate such rules.
The Supreme Court has also cautioned its employees against anything that might signal a political display, according to guidelines circulated to the staff and reviewed by The New York Times. Such displays would include signs and bumper stickers.
This term, the justices heard several cases related to — and stemming from — the Jan. 6 attack.
In March, the court, by a 9 to 0 vote, ruled that states may not block former President Donald J. Trump from the ballot, rejecting a challenge from Colorado. It is set to decide two other cases, one on whether Mr. Trump is immune from prosecution on charges that he plotted to subvert the election and another on whether prosecutors can use an obstruction statute typically used in white-collar cases to charge people involved in the Jan. 6 riot.
“It really is a question of appearances and the potential impact on public confidence in the court,” Mr. Fogel said. “I’m on the hawkish side of most ethical questions, and I think it would be better for the court if he weren’t involved in cases arising from the 2020 election."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/17/us/alito-stop-steal-flag-ethics.html
"From 1987 to 1990, Alito was the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey.[26] When he arrived, the office had begun the prosecution of 20 defendants accused of being mob affiliates of Anthony Accetturo.[27] In August 1988, the two-year trial, then the longest federal criminal trial in history, ended in the acquittal of all 20 after less than two days of jury deliberations.[28] Alito soon hired Michael Chertoff as his chief deputy.[28]
After an FBI agent was shot in the line of duty in 1988, Alito personally handled the trial, assigning himself the then-novice Stuart Rabner as an assistant, and securing the shooter's conviction.[28] In March 1988, Alito sought a rehearing of extradition proceedings against two Indian men, represented by Ron Kuby, who were accused of being terrorist assassins, after Alito discovered that the death threats his prosecutor had received had been sent to her by herself.[29] The prosecutor was later found not guilty of obstruction of justice by reason of insanity, after psychiatrists found she may have suffered from schizophrenia, with up to four distinct personalities.[28][30] ...
Third Circuit Judges Leonard I. Garth, for whom Alito clerked, and Maryanne Trump Barry, under whom Alito worked as an assistant U.S. Attorney, recommended Alito's judicial nomination to President George H. W. Bush.[19] On February 20, 1990, Bush nominated Alito to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, to a seat vacated by John Joseph Gibbons. The American Bar Association rated Alito "Well Qualified" at the time of his nomination. He was confirmed by unanimous consent in the Senate on April 27, 1990,[33][34] and received his commission three days later. As a Third Circuit judge, his chambers were in Newark, New Jersey.[15] ...
On July 1, 2005, Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor announced her retirement from the Supreme Court effective upon the confirmation of a successor. President George W. Bush first nominated John Roberts to the vacancy, but when Chief Justice William Rehnquist died on September 3, Bush withdrew Roberts's nomination to fill O'Connor's seat and instead nominated Roberts to the Chief Justiceship. On October 3, Bush nominated Harriet Miers to replace O'Connor. Miers withdrew her acceptance of the nomination on October 27 after encountering widespread opposition.
On October 31, Bush announced that he was nominating Alito to O'Connor's seat, and he submitted the nomination to the Senate on November 10.[36] Alito was unanimously rated "well qualified" to fill the Associate Justice post by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary, which measures the professional qualifications of a nominee.[37] The committee rates judges as "not qualified", "qualified", or "well qualified".[38] Leonard Leo was selected to play a role in shepherding Alito's appointment through the Senate.[39]
Alito's confirmation hearing was held from January 9 to 13, 2006. Two active-duty members of the Third Circuit, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry and Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica, testified in Alito's confirmation hearing, as did five senior and retired circuit judges.[40] Alito responded to some 700 questions over 18 hours of testimony. He rejected the use of foreign legal materials in the Constitution, did not state a position on cameras in courtrooms (he had supported them while on the 3rd Circuit), said Congress could choose to outlaw LGBT employment discrimination in the United States if it wished, and told then-Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) that he endorsed a weak version of the unitary executive theory.[41]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Alito
Accordingly, by SCOTUS' own standards, Alito and Thomas must now recuse themselves from all things linked to the crimes of Trump, Bush, the insurrectionist, the fake electors, the stolen documents, Russia, crimes disqualifying Trump and Bush from appointing judges, but not limited to the same, and where as Thom Hartmann and many others have reported, all of these crimes are part of a broader and ongoing criminal conspiracy overtly furthered by the GOP for no less than the last 91 years in a series of interconnected treason, elections fraud, insurrection, fake elector, stolen documents, obstruction, and RICO conspiracy plots by the GOP and other enemies of the United States to "engineer"enemies and criminals into public offices, who then RICO obstruct justice for the criminal enterprise.
UpRights News and The Hartmann Report having been keeping track of all of the different ways illegitimate individuals concealed their and others' disqualifications from public offices in an ongoing conspiracy, in order to illegitimately stack the U.S. judiciary, Congress, and the Presidency to serve enemies of the United States and ongoing organized crime, who then disqualified themselves in the manner described in the articles below, but not at all limited to the same, per one of our ongoing investigations into the illegitimacy of key offices within the U.S. government by enemies of the United States and organized crime serving the same.
https://www.uprightsnews.com/illegitimate-power
This body of research into disqualifying laws and disqualifying facts does prove the illegitimacy of Samuel Alito before and after he was "engineered" into public offices by the Bush and Trump crime families. The following four network diagrams elucidate how Alito was appointed in an illegitimate manner born out of the Bush crime family's treason and elections fraud crimes linked to the Anti-Castro Cuban group's execution of JFK by Frank Sturgis, G.H.W. Bush, and E. Howard Hunt (who sued Spotlight Magazine for defamation and lost that lawsuit, after he leaked to a reporter that he and others had killed JFK) and how that treason conspiracy was furthered by G.H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan during the October Surprise treason and elections fraud conspiracy spoke, followed by the Iran Contra treason conspiracy, resulting in the GOP SCOTUS majority that engaged in the elections fraud conspiracy of 2000 stopping the Democratic vote in Jeb Bush's Florida to "engineer" G.W. Bush into the Presidency, who then illegitimately appointed Roberts and Alito to SCOTUS, after the Bush administration aided, comforted, and/or adhered to enemies Russia and the Saudis by orchestrating military and NORAD exercises on 9/11 to send the air guard away from New York towards Russia, military exercises that employed almost precisely the same scenario as happened on 9/11, causing massive confusion on 9/11, as evidence of their premeditation.
This first network diagram is based on the evidence laid out in the documentary The Dark Legacy, and again where the most compelling evidence was that Frank Sturgis had specified to others that he and others killed JFK, then sued Spotlight Magazine, and then lost (after the CIA Director testified in this lawsuit), and where the motive was also made clear, that JFK had tasked J.E. Hoover, who had tasked Lee Harvey Oswald, to try and dismantle the CIA, and where G.H.W. Bush's Anti-Castro Cuban Group is who plotted the same, because dismantling the CIA threatened the profits of Bush's oil company, Zapata Oil, per the documentary by John Hankey.
Accordingly, G.H.W. Bush and these others disqualified themselves from public office in an immediate manner but concealed the same from the public, followed by Ronald Reagan conspiring to disqualifying treason with U.S. enemies in Iran during the October Surprise in order to "engineer" himself into public office with already disqualified G.H.W. Bush as Vice President, where after the two disqualified POTUS and VPOTUS conspired with enemies of the United States in Iran and with the Contras, further disqualifying themselves, while illegitimately appointing SCOTUS and other judges to stack the judiciary, including Clarence Thomas, who would later disqualify himself from public office along with his insurrectionist wife, Virginia Thomas.
The network diagrams above and below describe how the Bush and Reagan treason and elections fraud conspiracies to "engineer" organized crime and enemies of the United States into public offices after they had disqualified themselves from public office more than once resulted in the unlawful presidency of G.W. Bush, who then installed Alito and Roberts (who along with Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Thomas gave aid to the Bush crime family in "engineering" Bush into office, whereafter Bush illegitimately installed Roberts and Alito onto SCOTUS to RICO obstruct all of the same and much more).
Trump, whose family, along with the Bush family, allowed Alito to fail up into power over the judiciary, then illegitimately appointed Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Gorsuch into SCOTUS, after Trump committed disqualifying treason and elections fraud with U.S. enemy Russia BEFORE the 2016 elections, and thereafter.
Accordingly, by their own standards, the illegitimately-appointed GOP SCOTUS majority would be required to recuse themselves from any case involving the qualifications and/or disqualifications of Trump, Reagan, and/or the Bush family, because they were illegitimately-appointed by them, and thus would be acting as their own judges for their own eligibility, in order continue to maintain that they are above the law, which our research has concluded they are not, given that there are a great many of self-executing laws in the U.S. which prevent "anyone" and "whomever" from "any office" or government employment, if they have engaged in the conduct that the GOP SCOTUS majority have engaged in and/or if those appointing SCOTUS judges engaged in BEFORE appointing SCOTUS judges.
The least of which, for all things Trump --
Alito (who gave aid, comfort, and adhered to enemies of the United States, specifically the insurrectionists) would need to recuse himself and/or resign for having disqualified himself, and having been appointed by someone who was disqualified from appointing him (G.W. Bush), per SCOTUS' own ethics standards; and
Thomas (whose wife was an insurrectionists before he was caught in disqualifying and unreported bribery schemes) would need to recuse himself and/or resign for having disqualified himself, and having been appointed by someone who was disqualified from appointing him (G.H.W. Bush), per SCOTUS' own ethics standards; and
Barrett (who by ruling on any Trump immunity, insurrection, stolen documents, fake electors, elections fraud, RICO, and/or conspiracy case would be ruling on her own legitimacy, given that all of the same were spokes in a broader conspiracy that included Russia's treason and elections fraud with Trump and the GOP BEFORE Trump was "engineered" into office to appoint Barrett) would need to recuse herself and/or resign for having disqualified herself, and having been appointed by someone who was disqualified from appointing her (Trump) per SCOTUS' own ethics standards; and
Gorsuch (who by ruling on any Trump immunity, insurrection, stolen documents, fake electors, elections fraud, RICO, and/or conspiracy case would be ruling on his own legitimacy, given that all of the same were spokes in a broader conspiracy that included Russia's treason and elections fraud with Trump and the GOP BEFORE Trump was "engineered" into office to appoint Gorsuch) would need to recuse himself and/or resign for having disqualified himself, and having been appointed by someone who was disqualified from appointing him (Trump) per SCOTUS' own ethics standards; and
Kavanaugh (who by ruling on any Trump immunity, insurrection, stolen documents, fake electors, elections fraud, RICO, and/or conspiracy case would be ruling on his own legitimacy, given that all of the same were spokes in a broader conspiracy that included Russia's treason and elections fraud with Trump and the GOP BEFORE Trump was "engineered" into office to appoint Barrett) would need to recuse himself and/or resign for having disqualified himself, and having been appointed by someone who was disqualified from appointing him (Trump) per SCOTUS' own ethics standards.
But, because G.W. Bush wasn't lawfully "engineered" into the Presidency, aided by Roberts, Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh, followed by the conspiracy on 9/11 to send away our air guard towards Russia to allow Russia's ally the Saudis to attack the United States, all BEFORE Bush unlawfully-appointed Roberts and Alito -- as part of a broader and ongoing criminal conspiracy by the Bush family and Reagan to unlawfully "engineer" themselves into top positions of power over the United States legal landscape -- a broader criminal conspiracy furthered by Trump, the GOP, and Russia -- then Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch can't rule on (and must recuse or resign) regarding any spoke of this broader conspiracy per their own ethics standards, because not doing so ultimately is ruling on a spoke of the broader criminal conspiracy they are a part of and have furthered already as to whether or not SCOTUS and other judges were legitimately appointed by enemies of the United States and/or organized crime seeking to overthrow the United States, in order to allow the conspirators to evade criminal prosecution, seizure of assets, liability, and/or the death penalty.
Accordingly, Alito flying our flag upside is symbolic of the ongoing organized crime syndicate that unlawfully appointed Alito into power to RICO obstruct justice for the ongoing organized crime syndicate and enemies of the United States that unlawfully appointed Alito, to allow them all to continue to overthrow, best represented by the American flag overturned on its head and flown upside down by enemies of the United States and organized crime conspiring to overthrow us.
This upside down flag to "stop the steal" is a DARVO projection and technique of neutralization meant to revise history as to who overthrew the United States, and how they did so.
After stealing the 2000, 2004, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2020 elections, the GOP desperately needs to revise history that the 2020 elections they also tried to steal but couldn't was using flawed and evil logic, stolen from them, when the fact of the matter is that Trump and the GOP weren't eligible for public offices after their disqualifying treason and elections fraud with Trump, the GOP, U.S. enemy Russia, and other enemies, confirmed by U.S. laws for treason and elections fraud, and by the June 21, 2023 testimony of Trump's and the GOP's Special Counsel John Durham who affirmed the facts regarding the same.
Accordingly, after the Bush family stole the 2000 elections with the GOP SCOTUS majority they unlawfully appointed -- and after the GOP disqualified themselves from office then and thereafter -- they unlawfully stole SCOTUS appointments and installed Alito. Alito then flew an insurrection flag over his home to project he wanted what the insurrectionists wanted, to "stop the steal", while Trump's insurrection attempt to steal the 2022 elections are before Alito's court.
Therefore, Alito's upside down flag has one additional meaning -- that Alito, Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Trump, the GOP, Russia, and other enemies of the United States don't want anyone to steal what they stole from the American people for 91 years -- our rule of law, Constitutional protections from their criminal usurping of offices, and the RICO obstruction of justice that followed.