08/27/2025
Friedrich Nietzsche once wrote, "There is nothing very odd about lambs disliking birds of prey, but this is no reason for holding it against large birds of prey that they carry off lambs. And when the lambs whisper among themselves, "These birds of prey are evil, and does this not give us a right to say that whatever is the opposite of a bird of prey must be good?" there is nothing intrinsically wrong with such an argument-though the birds of prey will look somewhat quizzically and say, "We have nothing against these good lambs; in fact, we love them; nothing tastes better than a tender lamb.”
In the philosophical and mathematical sciences of logic, reasoning, and critical thinking, Nietzsche's moral relativism proved that the same circumstances can be good AND at the same time the same circumstances can be evil (for example a Crossfire Hurricane situation), making it difficult for anyone thereafter to argue that anything is good OR evil.
For example, it is good for a bird of prey to eat in order to not die, which would be evil. And it is evil for a lamb to die, by being eaten to death by a bird of prey. Accordingly, the same circumstances are both good and evil at the same time, which is known as a paradox or flaw in logic, reasoning, and critical thinking.
The paradox is resolvable, when two types of reality are introduced, objective reality and subjective reality, where objective reality is everything that actually exists at any moment in time, and subjective reality is what we think exists at any moment.
Objective reality finds that it is true that it is true and it is false that it is good AND (versus OR) it is bad at the same time, when one creature exploits, deceives, steals from, restrains, and/or kills another creature in order to not die and grow, which is good for the creature that survives and grows, regardless if the other creature(s) die and don't grow, which is evil for them, a win-lose scenario.
That's objective reality, but subjective reality is that it is true that it is good for the bird OR it is evil for the lamb. Subjective reality is an OR logic statement and objective reality is an AND logic statement.
The reason all of this is important is that politicians and corporations and billionaires and others like Trump divide and conquer using Russian Active Measures using OR statements.
More simply, they polarize or use subjective reality, in order to get the poles to infight to distract from his and others' disqualification from public offices, usurping those offices now to scrub investigations into their disqualifying crimes. Us versus them, except the billionaires can't take over without us, and we could devour them in one meal and be free of them and our oppressors (their protectors and proxies) in less than one day.
It is good for the billionaires to takeover everything and it is bad for everything to be taken over by the billionaires at the same time. It would be good for all of us to unite and to end billionaire-ism (a complex and networked mental disorder linked to hoarding, obsessive compulsion, addiction, sociopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, low self-esteem, and/or other issues).
When 8 billionaires linked to Jeffrey Epstein's treasonous child sex trafficking ring own half of the wealth on Earth, and that took about 20-30 years, then how fast will the 2000-10000 billionaires lying in wait for the other half of the wealth take to hoard the same? Isn't that good for them? Isn't taking everything away from everyone good for them even if it is evil for everyone else? Would it be good for us to devour them all in one meal along with anyone who supports them, and couldn't 8 billion people do this in less than a day? Yes, except they divide and conquer us by tricking others into believing their false narratives that we are our enemy instead of them, Russian Active Measures born out of the royals of Europe, which weaponizes natural differences in the population, to divide and conquer.
Billionaire-ism is largely a hypothalamic disorder with respect to overactive ventromedial nuclei in the hypothalamus "wanting", "needing", and "craving" more assets and power and circumstances than they can ever properly use, in a manner that harms them and/or other people, which is the basic definition of hoarding, and which normally requires legal and medical intervention, but for these people being above the law, or as JD Vance and the Nazis have said, "there is no law, only power (over the law)", is how they roll. This is good for them, and fuck everyone else is their general attitude. Maybe we should do what is good for us?
The end goal of billionaire-ism is to be the world's biggest babies, to get everything you want right now or else, which includes not cleaning their own golden toilets, having others drive them around to play dates, having others feed them and clean up after them, or else. Maybe we should end billionaire-ism everywhere? If it leads to slavery, and it does lead to slavery, then maybe the sooner we end billionaires the better?
And so Jeffrey Epstein's and Trump's and Putin's international crime syndicate is exposed (that is bad for them) and they are scared, and they are trying to create distraction after distraction regards their ongoing criminal conspiracies to steal elections around the world via treason, murder, and elections fraud schemes, followed by RICO obstruction -- an ongoing criminal conspiracy with many spokes, and as old as at least WWII, with the GOP's Prescott Bush's treason with Edward VIII and Hitler, and then the GOP's Nixon, Reagan, and G.W.H. Bush's treason and/or elections fraud with enemies, followed by the 2000 elections steal and 9/11 distraction, followed by the 2016 elections steal with U.S. enemy Russia followed by the COVID murder distraction, followed by the Russian and Israeli grifts to distract from the syndicate's ongoing crimes and RICO obstruction and intimidation -- because it is good for them, regardless if their crimes are bad for everyone else.
For the cowards paid to stop them, who don't and fail to stop them because they are scared, it is good for them not to stop this treasonous child sex trafficking ring, because then they get to keep their jobs, after Trump engaged in economic terrorism against the United States and Americans, as an agent of Russia would, by firing those who did not support his crimes, and/or who had knowledge of the same, and he attacked the United States with his environmentally-toxic pro-fossil fuel position (in the context that many of the top fossil fuel decision makers are linked to the treasonous child sex trafficking ring of Trump, Epstein, and Putin), and Trump attacked America's economy, and he attacked the U.S. government, and he attacked the U.S. military, and Trump attacked America with his hidden taxes (tariffs) to drive up prices in America, while wages don't grow as fast, which only results in economic slavery, massive poverty, while Jeffrey Epstein's Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein's Google founders made robots to try and take jobs away from humanity towards an engineered Malthusian crash in the population, where we will eventually be forced to eat one another alive and then back into the jungle with us, until the billionaires emerge from their bunkers and teach our grandkids that they are gods, our creators, and those sent to wash away our sins (against them), like a child sex trafficker might talk to caged victim.
Economic slavery is pretty simple, decrease revenues or keep them flat or barely let them grow, then jack up the price of everything, so that you are left with little to no savings and/or debt (a tool used by child sex traffickers like but not limited to NXIVM's and Jeffrey Epstein's and Trump's merged treasonous child sex trafficking ring).
Economic Slavery = Expenses (increased with Trump tariffs, a hidden tax) = or > Revenues (reduce or keep flat)
Here's a graph of wealth inequality growth over the last few decades, where you see the billionaires increasing their wealth at the cost of the lower and middle classes, and where Trump and the GOP are gutting the government spending on the middle class and lower class paid for by them, in order to give tax breaks to the billionaire crime syndicate of Jeffrey Epstein, to engineer more of the same below.
Next and see below this paragraph, economic slavery requires that Trump's tariffs and the reciprocal retaliation tariffs by the allied countries he attacked result in inflation or increases in pricing for the middle class and lower class -- which is what an economic terrorist and an agent of enemies of the United States would do -- enemies like Russia (ICC issued a warrant for Putin for trafficking children after the 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Russia's attorney and the Trump family and GOP, to traffic children to the Trumps) and enemies like the Saudis (9/11 investigations linked 9/11 to Jeffrey Epstein's Saudi royals, covered up by Jeffrey Epstein's Henry Kissinger, G.W. Bush, Robert Mueller, and/or others, who also failed to prosecute as many as 1,971 conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein, including Trump. These treason and elections fraud conspiracies disqualifying the Bush family, Trump family, and others for public office and forever, resulted in the GOP SCOTUS majority, who then self-immunized and self-legitimized or self-appointed themselves, because those who appointed them had already disqualified themselves from public office via treason and elections fraud. See our Big Pictures link above.
Sure enough, Trump's hidden taxes on Americans and their allies to fund Jeffrey Epstein's billlionaires' tax cuts has indeed resulted in inflation and is harming the average American, which is exactly what would be expected from a Russian agent, installed by Russia to do so, to totally destroy America, American culture, American social fabric, and to leave a wasteland as toxic as T.S. Eliot.
Stephen Prager of Common Dreams has confirmed, "Grocery Chains Are Passing Trump Tariff Costs on to US Consumers With Higher Prices: Report: Reckless tariff policy is wreaking warrantless chaos on our economy, with grocery giants shifting market uncertainty onto consumers," said Accountable.
As leading grocery chains increase prices on essentials, they are blaming US President Donald Trump's tariffs for raising the cost of living for households across the country.
According to the Consumer Price Index, the price of food has increased by 3% in the past year, with meats, poultry, fish, and eggs getting 5.6% more expensive from June 2024 to June 2025.
In a poll published this month by the Associated Press and the National Opinion Research Center, 90% of Americans reported that they considered the cost of groceries a source of stress, with 53% describing it as a "major" source of stress.
In earnings calls and public statements, executives of many of America's largest and most profitable grocery retailers are citing Trump's tariffs as justification for passing on the costs to consumers, according to a new report released on Tuesday by Accountable.US.
In a first-quarter earnings call in May, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said that while the company was better positioned than others to absorb the cost of tariffs, they would still "result in higher prices" for consumers. Since then, some grocery items at America's largest retailer have shown 40% hikes that have outraged consumers, fueling calls for a boycott.
On another call Thursday, McMillon said, "We've continued to see our costs increase each week, which we expect will continue into the third and fourth quarters."
"Trump's tariffs are making groceries more expensive," said Accountable.US. "Everyday Americans pay the cost while corporations and the wealthy profit."
Costco's chief financial officer, Gary Millerchip, told shareholders in May that the company "saw inflation as a result of tariffs because we import certain fresh items from Central and South America."
Kroger's CFO, Todd Foley, projected similar hikes to fresh food prices beginning in March. Though Foley said the impact would not likely be as significant as those experienced by their international competitors, he said the tariffs would likely cause "mid-single digit effects" on the costs of produce imported from Mexico and Canada.
Albertsons CEO Susan Miller has acknowledged that the company is raising prices on some goods to compensate for tariffs. But it has also turned the screws on its suppliers, demanding that they eat the cost of the new levies.
In the American Prospect, David Dayen described the latter as an example of how the tariffs were helping monopolies consolidate their power.
"Albertsons holds a significant market share in the grocery market, particularly in the western United States," he wrote. "Independent grocers, however, typically don't have the same ability to dictate terms to suppliers, and therefore will have to take whatever they can get."
Many of the companies currently raising prices have previously been caught or even admitted to price-gouging consumers to take advantage of inflation in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. The tariffs, a regressive tax that Trump has suggested as a way to offset the massive tax cuts given to the wealthy, have further exacerbated that pain.
"While Trump grants massive tax cuts to massive corporations and the ultra-rich," said Accountable.US President Caroline Ciccone, "his reckless tariff policy is wreaking warrantless chaos on our economy, with grocery giants shifting market uncertainty onto consumers."
And so there it is, the treasonous child sex trafficking ring of Trump and Epstein are enslaving Americans and the world with their tariffs grift, and many different ways (Jeffrey Epstein's Trump has handed out more than one multibillion dollar contract/taxpayer funds to Jeffrey Epstein's billionaire crime syndicate and/or associates, but here by jacking up the prices of goods on the middle and lower class to make even more billions for these billionaires like Bezos, while we all suffer. More simply, the billionaires are taking our share of wealth, because it is good for them, even if it is evil for us.
And yet Trump and his family have used the Presidency to increase their wealth by over $3 billion.
And yet the pay for the government employee known as the President is not enough to explain where this wealth came from, and where Trump was allegedly in major debt, and has since lost major lawsuits, and yet up $3 billion? Yup, that is good for him, regardless if that came from us, taxpayers, in the context he may have evaded paying taxes. That's kind of like his medical bone spurs fraud he used to cower out of Vietnam only to then call fallen veterans "suckers" and "losers", only to then steal two elections to proclaim himself the leader of the U.S. military, who he separately betrayed by pulling out of Syria to aid ISIS, Russia, and/or Iran. Which bunch of cowards let him get away with all of this? And he leaked intel, led an insurrection, conspired with enemies, stole elections and evidence, with little to zero accountability, because of cowardly Americans too afraid to stop him.
And so wealth among Jeffrey Epstein's billionaires continues to exponentially grow since their treasonous child sex trafficking ring overthrew the U.S. government to obstruct justice for their prosecution, including for disqualifying crimes that negate all of their changes to the government, just as soon as the cowards we paid to protect us find a spine and prosecute this treasonous child sex trafficking ring and its current and/or former leaders, including Donald Trump, Bezos, Page, Brin, Musk, Zuckerberg, Black, Gates, Hoffman, Murdoch, Saudis, Netanyahu, Wildenstein, Bush, Barr, Mueller, Putin, Maxwell, Crow, Thomas, Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Alito, 'royals', and/or others, is a reasonable inference.
And if those we pay to protect us from monsters won't, then how are we better than jungle savages, who have at least one toxic savage per region, who scares the crap out of everyone around them into compliance, to get what they want right now -- more than their fair share of bribes and lots of touching? Is this good for you? Is this good for us? Is this good for them? Is it good for billionaires to stop overpopulation by hoarding the resources required to survive and grow? Is it good for billions of people to immediately take back everything from the billionaires?
In his Outline of History (1920) H. G Wells wrote that ‘Civilization is in a race between education and catastrophe".
Be the change you want to see.