Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is our hero of the week, having filed articles of impeachment for two of America's greatest enemies, specifically Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who were never lawfully-appointed to SCOTUS, because of treason and elections crimes of those unlawfully-appointing them having disqualified them from office before appointing, as illustrated in the network diagram below. Joining her on our heroes list are Representatives Barbara Lee (CA-12), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Delia Ramirez (IL-3), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Ilhan Omar (MN-5), Jamaal Bowman (NY-16), Jasmine Crockett (TX-30).
Here are downloadable copies of the impeachment resolutions, followed by the Congressional website links to the same.
"The first impeachment resolution includes the following impeachment articles against Justice Thomas:
- Failure to disclose financial income, gifts and reimbursements, property interests, liabilities, and transactions, among other information.
- Refusal to recuse from matters concerning his spouse’s legal interest in cases before the court.
- Refusal to recuse from matters involving his spouse’s financial interest in cases before the court.
The second impeachment resolution includes the following impeachment articles against Justice Alito:
- Refusal to recuse from cases in which he had a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party in cases before the court.
- Failure to disclose financial income, gifts and reimbursements, property interests, liabilities, and transactions, among other information.
The Congresswoman maintains that such conduct—while under a Judicial Oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge and perform” duties and a Constitutional Oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”—warrants impeachment, trial, removal from office, and disqualification from holding future office in the United States of America.
On June 11, 2024, Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez and Congressman Jamie Raskin hosted an oversight roundtable with expert panelists and legislators, including Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), entitled “High Court, Low Standards, and Dark Money: Flagging a Supreme Court Ethics Crisis in America,” to examine corruption on the court.
On June 20, they wrote a letterto Chief Justice John Roberts to learn what immediate action he would take to restore public trust in the Court amidst severe ethical conflicts.
Additionally, on June 25, the lawmakers introduced the High Court Gift Ban Act to prohibit Supreme Court justices from receiving gifts valued at more than $50, bringing them in line with Members of Congress and other federal officials.
Read the full text of the resolution filed against Justice Clarence Thomas here.
Read the full text of the resolution filed against Justice Samuel Alito here.
Cosponsors: Representatives Barbara Lee (CA-12), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Delia Ramirez (IL-3), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), Ilhan Omar (MN-5), Jamaal Bowman (NY-16), Jasmine Crockett (TX-30)
Endorsers: Court Accountability, Free Speech for People, Get Free, MoveOn, NextGen America, Our Revolution, People’s Parity Project, UltraViolet, Women’s March, Take Back The Court"
The GOP SCOTUS majority usurpers have since RICO obstructed justice for each of those disqualifying conspiracies, and/or attempted to, by unconstitutionally-inventing unconstitutional absolute immunity laws for the former disqualified GOP presidents who appointed them, overtly furthering EACH of those disqualifying criminal conspiracies in 2024, opening them up to lawsuits, removal, and the voiding of all of their changes to the government, per hundreds of pages of UPR News legal research. There is in fact more than one path beyond impeachment for the removal of the corrupted, illegitimate, and RICO obstructing SCOTUS usurpers, as explained in part by Prakash and Smith in 2006, but not at all limited to the same.
"Most everyone assumes that impeachment is the only means of removing federal judges and that the Constitution's grant of good behavior tenure is an implicit reference to impeachment. This article challenges these widely shared assumptions. Using evidence from England, the colonies, and the revolutionary state constitutions, the article demonstrates that at the time of the founding good behavior tenure and impeachment had only the most tenuous of relationships. Good behavior, when discussed in the context of the government, consisted of a tenure in office whereby the officer would forfeit her office upon a judicial finding of misbehavior. There would have to be a trial, the hearing of witnesses, and the introduction of evidence, with misbehavior proved by the party seeking to oust the tenured individual. Impeachment, by contrast, referred to a criminal procedure conducted in the legislature that could lead to an array of criminal sanctions. In England and in the colonies, impeachment was never seen as a means of judging whether someone with good behavior tenure had forfeited her office by reason of misbehavior. Most state constitutions did not equate good behavior tenure with impeachment either. Indeed, some distinguished them explicitly. Compared to prior scholarship on good behavior tenure, this article provides a more complete, and therefore more credible, understanding of good behavior tenure. In particular, we demonstrate several propositions for the first time: 1) that the English understanding of good behavior tenure had migrated to her colonies and continued in independent America; 2) that good behavior tenure was not limited to government officials but could be granted to anyone, including tenants in land, licensees, and employees; 3) that the English writ of scire facias was not the only mechanism for ousting those with good behavior tenure; and 4) that the state constitutions generally did not regard impeachment as a means of judging good behavior. Taken together, these propositions devastate the conventional conflation of good behavior tenure with impeachment."
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895607
And as accessories after the fact for all of the disqualifying crimes of those who unlawfully-appointed them, including insurrection, all of the GOP SCOTUS majority immediately disqualified themselves from public office, per the very conservative Federalist Society's Baude and Paulsen (2024).
"Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This Article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress. It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election."
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4532751
UPR News has come to the same conclusion, and found even more legal paths to disqualify, remove, and void these GOP SCOTUS usurpers and their unlawful changes to the government, giving aid, comfort, and adhering to enemies of the United States and child sex traffickers, so dearly embraced by fake Christians trapped in the GOP cult of Trump, who the rest of us need to try and save by giving them enough facts as to let them see the light from this darkness. Free our Republican brothers and sisters from this evil cult.
In addition to becoming accessories after the fact for an ongoing conspiracy of numerous disqualifying crimes appointing them, and all of the GOP SCOTUS usurpers having been hand-picked by Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's coconspirators, organized crime syndicate, and/or orbit financing the Federalist Society who hand-picked the six usurpers, they also RICO obstructed justice for the victims of the ongoing conspiracy of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate, clients, financiers, and/or associates.