Military might depends on a strong economy, which hidden economic reports prove Comrade Trump is destroying as an agent of Russia, after being "engineered" into power by them in a treason plot, per the testimony of John Durham, Yvegeny Prigozhin, US intelligence, emails of Cohen and Sater, and more.

10/04/2025

RUSSIAN AGENTS TRUMP AND HIS FAMILY'S GOP ARE HIDING THEIR CARNAGE TO THE US ECONOMY

Recent reports have revealed that Russia's and Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump and GOP -- engineered into power by Russia, an enemy of the United States per John Durham and Congressman Adam Schiff -- have been hiding economic data hiding Trump's and the GOP's destruction of the US economy on behalf of the Russian military as agents of Russia, is a reasonable inference.

Per Julia Conley at Common Dreams, "‘People’s Jobs Report’ From Economic Justice Campaigners Shows Harm of GOP Policies: “Trump stopped the Bureau of Labor Statistics from releasing its monthly jobs report,” said one advocate. “But people deserve to know just how bad Trump’s economy is.”
With the US government entering the third day of a shutdown Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics didn’t release the monthly jobs report as scheduled—but one economic justice group said that even without the official analysis of the labor market, it’s clear that President Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s policies have “devastated workers and families,” with the shutdown making matters worse for millions.

Unrig Our Economy provided its own People’s Jobs Report to “fill the gaps” left by Republicans, who have refused to agree to Democrats’ demands to extend Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies and reverse Medicaid cuts in a spending bill to keep the government open.

Trump and GOP leaders have falsely claimed that Democrats are demanding “free healthcare” for undocumented immigrants—who are not eligible for government-run healthcare programs like Medicaid. The Democratic Party and experts have warned that the expiration of the ACA subsidies would raise healthcare premiums by 75% for millions of Americans.

Unrig Our Economy noted in its “Jobs Day” report that the expiration of the tax credits could also cost the US economy nearly 300,000 jobs in the next year, including 130,000 jobs lost “because of direct reductions in the provision of hospital, physician, and other ambulatory care as well as reductions in pharmacy-related services.”

As the Commonwealth Fund reported in March, 156,000 jobs could be lost next year in sectors including manufacturing, retail, and real estate “as a result of the indirect or induced effects of healthcare funding losses,” with rural communities among the hardest-hit areas.

“This ‘People’s Jobs Report’ from Unrig Our Economy shows how destructive Republican policies have been on the economy.”

Those projected losses would compound “some of the most alarming economic developments” under the Republican-controlled government, said Unrig Our Economy.

The group cited an ADP report which found that while official statistics can’t be reported as long as the BLS is closed, US companies shed an estimated 32,000 jobs in September.

About 13,000 jobs were lost in June, the group noted—the first time the economy lost jobs since 2020. The unemployment rate in last month’s BLS report stood at 4.3%—the highest it’s been since 2021.

Unemployment claims also rose to nearly 2 million in August—the highest since 2021—while Trump’s tariff policies have “caused chaos for employers” including small businesses, where employment has dropped by 26,700 since the president took office for his second term in January.

“In tariff-related industries, payrolls fell by 90,100 jobs, including 42,000 jobs in manufacturing,” said Unrig Our Economy. “Wholesale trade jobs fell by more than 26,000 since January and mining and logging jobs fell by 12,000 during the same period.”

The group released its report a day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called on the federal government to move forward with releasing the official jobs report despite the government shut down. Democrats have warned that the Trump administration has kept Americans in the dark about the true state of the economy, including when the president demanded the firing of Erika McEntarfer, who until August was the commissioner of the BLS.

McEntarfer was dismissed after the agency released a jobs report that showed the economy had added only 73,000 jobs in July—data that Trump baselessly claimed had been falsified to harm him politically. Her departure, however, didn’t stop the flow of negative news about the economy under Republican leadership; the jobs report released in early September showed only 22,000 jobs created the previous month.

“Donald Trump’s economic agenda is inflicting massive pain on our economy and to add to the economic uncertainty, he’s shut down the government rather than save healthcare for millions of Americans,” said Warren on Thursday. “But let’s be clear: The jobs data scheduled to come out this Friday has undoubtedly been collected and the president must release it. Without it, the Federal Reserve will not have the full picture it needs to make decisions this month about interest rates that will impact every family across the country. Donald Trump has the power to make sure the federal government can continue producing and releasing this critical information on Friday and beyond during his shutdown.”

William Beach, a former commissioner of the BLS, said this week that the September jobs data has been collected.

“Trump stopped the Bureau of Labor Statistics from releasing its monthly jobs report because Americans are struggling, and the numbers are disastrous,” said Alexandra De Luca of American Bridge 21st Century. “But people deserve to know just how bad Trump’s economy is.”

A Bloomberg poll of economists found that employers likely added 53,000 jobs last month—fewer than the average of 64,000 added over the previous six months—and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago estimated that the unemployment rate has remained at 4.3%.

“Working people deserve a government that lowers their healthcare costs and creates good-paying jobs,” said Leor Tal, Unrig Our Economy campaign director Leor Tal. “This People’s Jobs Report from Unrig Our Economy shows how destructive Republican policies have been on the economy. Not only are Republicans in Congress tanking the economy by raising costs on families and cutting essential programs that help them make ends meet, but they’re destroying jobs too—all while giving billionaires massive tax breaks.”"

https://www.commondreams.org/news/shutdown-jobs

RUSSIAN AGENTS TRUMP AND THE GOP ARE ATTACKING THE USA MANY DIFFERENT WAYS FOR RUSSIA

Uprights News and others have documented the rise of Russian agents, Jeffrey Epstein's Trump and the GOP, who have been accused of treason by at least one CIA Director, John Brennan, as well as by former military prosecutor, Glenn Kirschner -- but what would they know about US law and treason -- other than everything, right?

We have been documenting the physical, economic, social, religious, legal, military, and other attacks of these Russian agents on our country -- and below -- they have been found to be hiding public data as to their carnage of the US economy (which will move us closer and faster towards not being able to pay our military and law enforcement at the same time Comrade Trump starts wars abroad and within the country, already started with military occupation of Democratic cities) on behalf of Russia's FSB and GRU, who "engineered" Trump and the GOP into office (to do all of the same) per Putin's Prigozhen before his murder, just like Putin's Sater promised to Trump's Cohen, followed by Mike Flynn rushing to meeting directly with Putin on behalf of the Trump and GOP treason and elections fraud conspiracy specified by Sater and Durham.

Their treason has been proven publicly, but never charged due to RICO corruption and obstruction, but proven by the 11/03/2015 emails of Felix Sater and Michael Cohen, proven by the testimony of John Durham to Adam Schiff, and proven with Trump meeting with Russia's Ambassador at the Mayflower Hotel, followed by the infamous Trump Tower meeting with Don Jr. and Russia's sanctions attorney, followed by Trump literally asking US enemy Russia to cyberterrorize and attack the emails of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, which Russia did, per US intelligence, and per US Congressional investigations, and Special Counsel investigations, and other investigations, collectively provide along with Baude and Pauisen that Trump and the GOP immediately disqualified themselves from public office in 2015 and thereafter, per our reporting, supra.

Prikash and Smith argue that Trump, SCOTUS, the GOP in Congress, and in every office, may be removed from office for bad behavior and/or bad faith, which allow for the voiding of all of their changes to the government, but the people need enforcement of US law to remove these enemies from illegitimate power, which is why they have now demanded and threatened US soldiers with termination or worse if they don't take a loyalty pledge to Trump over the US Constitution, which demands that the military immediately remove this disqualified individual from the highest public office for bad behavior and bad faith behavior while in public office as a de facto officer, "engineered" into power by US enemies and the crime syndicate of Jeffrey Epstein. 

Enforcing US and law and the Constitution is all that Americans have to do in order to be free of this oppression, which is why Trump, the GOP, and the news and media network of Jeffrey Epstein's billionaires keeping scaring the public, with mass firings, displays of brutal force, to have a small group of people scare the world's most armed population into not organizing to lawfully retake their government back from treasonous child sex traffickers. This requires bravery and conversations outside, far away from devices. 

SUPERPOWER RESEARCH SUPPORTS THAT TRUMP, THE GOP, AND RUSSIA AIM TO DESTROY AMERICA

Researchers into superpowers have determined that a superpower, also known as a hegemony, or military-industrial complex, is essentially composed of two things, the strongest economy and the strongest military, and where superpowers often grow in geographic isolation from direct war, and can thus develop a booming economy, used to protect the assets in the country, and an economy so strong that they can protect assets outside the country, and where 400 years of superpower research has concluded that superpowers fail when they are at war outside and inside the country, and this depletes the economy (as billionaires agree to provide their friends with billions in government contracts, and then they invest in one another's political campaigns, or via proxies) to the point where the economy can no longer pay for the assets inside nor outside of the country to be protected, at which point the superpower is torn apart.

We are documenting all the ways Russian agents Trump and the GOP are attacking the United States and its allies in order serve the military goals of US enemies, Russia, Putin, FSB, GRU, Rosneft, Alfa Bank, Trump, the GOP, and the crime syndicate and associates of Jeffrey Epstein and/or those they can influence.

PAUL KENNEDY AND HIS BOOK ON THE RISE AND FALL OF GREAT POWERS

Paul "Kennedy argues that the strength of a Great Power can be properly measured only relative to other powers, and he provides a straightforward thesis: Great Power ascendancy (over the long term or in specific conflicts) correlates strongly to available resources and economic durability; military overstretch and a concomitant relative decline are the consistent threats facing powers whose ambitions and security requirements are greater than their resource base can provide for.^[2]

Throughout the book he reiterates his early statement (page 71): "Military and naval endeavors may not always have been the raison d'être of the new nations-states, but it certainly was their most expensive and pressing activity", and it remains such until the power's decline. He concludes that declining countries can experience greater difficulties in balancing their preferences for guns, butter and investments.^[3]

Kennedy states his theory in the second paragraph of the introduction as follows:

The "military conflict" referred to in the book's subtitle is therefore always examined in the context of "economic change". The triumph of any one Great Power in this period, or the collapse of another, has usually been the consequence of lengthy fighting by its armed forces; but it has also been the consequences of the more or less efficient utilization of the state's productive economic resources in wartime, and, further in the background, of the way in which that state's economy had been rising or falling, relative to the other leading nations, in the decades preceding the actual conflict. For that reason, how a Great Power's position steadily alters in peacetime, is as important to this study as how it fights in wartime.^[4]

Kennedy adds on the same page:

The relative strengths of the leading nations in world affairs never remain constant, principally because of the uneven rate of growth among different societies and of the technological and organizational breakthroughs which bring a greater advantage to one society than to another.^[5]

Kennedy's book starts at the dividing line between the Renaissance and early modern history—1500 (chapter 1). It briefly discusses the Ming (page 4) and Muslim worlds (page 9) of the time and the rise of the western powers relative to them (page 16). The book then proceeds chronologically, looking at each of the power shifts over time and the effect on other Great Powers and the "Middle Powers".

Kennedy uses a number of measures to indicate real, relative and potential strength of nations throughout the book. He changes the metric of power based on the point in time. Chapter 2, "The Habsburg Bid for Mastery, 1519–1659" emphasizes the role of the "manpower revolution" in changing the way Europeans fought wars (see military revolution). This chapter also emphasizes the importance of Europe's political boundaries in shaping a political balance of power.

The argument in this chapter is not, therefore, that the Habsburgs failed utterly to do what other powers achieved so brilliantly. There are no stunning contrasts in evidence here; success and failure are to be measured by very narrow differences. All states, even the United Provinces, were placed under severe strain by the constant drain of resources for military and naval campaigns... The victory of the anti-Habsburg forces was, then, a marginal and relative one. They had managed, but only just, to maintain the balance between their material base and their military power better than their Habsburg opponents. (page 72)

European imperialism

The Habsburg failure segues into the thesis of chapter 3, that financial power reigned between 1660 and 1815, using Britain, France, Prussia, Austria-Hungary, and Russia to contrast between powers that could finance their wars (Britain and France) and powers that needed financial patronage to mobilize and maintain a major military force on the field. Kennedy presents a table (page 81, table 2) of "British Wartime Expenditures and Revenue"; between 1688 and 1815 is especially illustrative, showing that Britain was able to maintain loans at around one-third of British wartime expenditures throughout that period

• Total wartime expenditures, 1688–1815: £2,293,483,437^{[clarification needed]}
• Total income: £1,622,924,377
• Balance raised by loans: £670,559,060
• Loans as per cent of expenditure: 33.3%

The chapter also argues that British financial strength was the single most decisive factor in its victories over France during the 18th century. This chapter ends on the Napoleonic Wars and the fusion of British financial strength with a newfound industrial strength.

Industrial Revolution

Kennedy's next two chapters depend greatly upon Bairoch's calculations of industrialization, measuring all nations by an index, where 100 is the British per capita industrialization rate in 1900. The United Kingdom grows from 10 in 1750, to 16 in 1800, 25 in 1830, 64 in 1860, 87 in 1880, to 100 in 1900 (page 149). In contrast, France's per capita industrialization was 9 in 1750, 9 in 1800, 12 in 1830, 20 in 1860, 28 in 1880, and 39 in 1900. Relative shares of world manufacturing output (also first appearing on page 149) are used to estimate the peaks and troughs of power for major states. China, for example, begins with 32.8% of global manufacturing in 1750 and plummets after the First Opium War, Second Opium War and Taiping Rebellion to 19.7% of global manufacturing in 1860, and 12.5% in 1880 (compared to the UK's 1.9% in 1750, growing to 19.9% in 1860, and 22.9% in 1880).

20th century

Measures of strength in the 20th century (pages 199–203) use population size, urbanization rates, Bairoch's per capita levels of industrialization, iron and steel production, energy consumption (measured in millions of metric tons of coal equivalent), and total industrial output of the powers (measured against Britain's 1900 figure of 100), to gauge the strength of the various great powers.

Kennedy also emphasizes productivity increase, based on systematic interventions, which led to economic growth and prosperity for great powers in the 20th century.

He compares the great powers at the close of the 20th century. Kennedy predicts the decline of the United States and the Soviet Union.^[6]: 141 Kennedy predicts the rise of Japan and struggles and potential for the European Economic Community (EEC). Kennedy predicts the rise of China, stating that if kept up, its economic development would change the country in decades and it would become a great power.^[6]: 141 He highlights the precedent of the Four Modernizations in Deng Xiaoping's plans for China—agriculture, industry, science and military—de-emphasizing military, while the United States and Soviet Union are emphasizing it. He predicts that continued deficit spending, especially on military build-up, will be the single most important reason for decline of any great power.

The United States

From the Civil War to the first half of the 20th century, the United States' economy benefited from high agricultural production, plentiful raw materials, technological advancements and financial inflows. During this time the U.S. did not have to contend with foreign dangers.^[7] From 1860 to 1914, U.S. exports increased sevenfold, resulting in huge trade surpluses.^[8] By 1945 the U.S. both enjoyed high productivity and was the only major industrialized nation intact after World War II. From the 1960s onward, the U.S. saw a relative decline in its share of world production and trade.^[9] By the 1980s, the U.S. experienced declining exports of agricultural and manufactured goods. In the space of a few years, the U.S. went from being the largest creditor to the largest debtor nation.^[10] At the same time, the federal debt was growing at an increasing pace.^[11] This situation is typical of declining hegemons.^[12]

The United States has the typical problems of a great power, which include balancing guns and butter and investments for economic growth.^[13] The U.S.' growing military commitment to every continent (other than Antarctica) and the growing cost of military hardware severely limit available options.^[14] Kennedy compares the U.S.' situation to Great Britain's prior to World War I. He comments that the map of U.S. bases is similar to Great Britain's before World War I.^[15]

As military expenses grow, this reduces investments in economic growth, which eventually "leads to the downward spiral of slower growth, heavier taxes, deepening domestic splits over spending priorities, and weakening capacity to bear the burdens of defense".^[16] Kennedy's advice is as follows:

The task facing American statesmen over the next decades, therefore, is to recognize that broad trends are under way, and that there is a need to "manage" affairs so that the relative erosion of the United States' position takes place slowly and smoothly, and is not accelerated by policies which bring merely short-term advantage but longer-term disadvantage.^[17]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_Powers

HOW TRUMP'S AND GOP'S TREASONOUS CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING RING IS PART OF AN OLDER SYNDICATE

Per our Big Pictures and Crossfire Hurricane Origins links in the menu at the top of the page, and overlapping with the Habsburgs studied by Kennedy, and overlapping with the research of Dr. Richard Spence -- Trump and the GOP are part of a much older -- and the wealthiest organized crime syndicate in modern history -- dating back to the forged royal claims of the Habsburg (many to most European royals employ Habsburg claims, which have been proven to be forged or false or non-existent royal claims) in the forged land deeds known as Privilegium maius, used by them to elevate themselves to royals. who then overthrew (with infiltration, treason, and sedition organizations like their Freemasons) the thrones of Europe as forged royals for 666 years this year, so almost biblical. History teaches us these fake royals overthrew directly, or using freemason and other proxies, who would pretend to be the resistance to fake royalty, but who actually swore a secret oath to serve them.

Our own investigation into the 'royal' claims of the modern English royals revealed they were more than 50th place in line for the English throne (Duke of Lancaster or King of England for the Dutchy of Lancaster or England), and we found at least four families with greater royal claims than the current English 'royals'.

The families we found with the greatest claims, were directly descendent from Henry I, Henry II, and Edward III, and made royals by Papal Bull of 1397-1399, and by royal declaration of the king, and by Act of Parliament, a priori and a fortiori to the current English royals, and in fact this true royal blood line from the actual royals of England resulted in the blood line of Abigail Adams, the wife of John Adams, the author of The Declaration of Independence, claiming independence from the forged royals who usurped the thrones of Abigail Adams, via the Fitzalan and Beaufort family lines, well researched by Harvard's H.E. Scott. The 'royals' know others have greater claims than them, and even a film has been made about one family with a greater claim, but quoting the Nazis the English royals worked with on a treason plot resulting in the Battle of Britain, "there is no law, there is only power (over the law)".

The current English royals base one of their other debunked or lesser royal claims on the Beaufort line, but the Adams family has a greater Salic and Carolingian royal succession claim through Henry Beaufort, the elder brother of Joan and Margaret Beaufort, and where the current Beaufort royal claim was made by Henry VII retroactively over a century later, in order for the current royals to claim to be royals, except other families related to Henry Beaufort and the Fitzalans have a greater Salic and Carolingian blood right they can retroactively claim to be the actual versus pretend King of England.

Also almost biblical, the Great Deceiver -- Donald Trump (officially holds the record for the most lies told on record) -- is upon us, and he is bringing hell to all of the Earth, to help Jeffrey Epstein's treasonous child sex trafficking ring not just harbor criminals, but he's put them in charge of investigative agencies to prosecute prosecutors and others using the facts and law to disqualify Trump and the GOP from public offices, for the likes of treason, sedition, insurrection, terrorism, murder, RICO, obstruction of justice, witness intimidation, judicial intimidation, prosecutorial intimidation, investigator intimidation, law enforcement intimidation, military intimidation, as enemies of the United States and agents of Russia and conspirators in an ongoing complex organized crime syndicate would.

CELEBRATING THEIR TREASON-GOT POWER TOGETHER

Recently, circa September 17, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein's UK royals hosted Jeffrey Epstein's Trump family celebrating their lording over the world in a display of power with representatives of companies, whose founders are also linked to Jeffrey Epstein, for example Bill Gates of Microsoft.

And so Jeffrey Epstein's UK royals inherited a treason-got throne and used the same to host Jeffrey Epstein's treasonous child sex trafficker, Donald Trump, who the UK royals' Ivar Mountbatten's SCL's Cambridge Analytica conspired with Russia to engineer Trump and Brexit candidates into power in a separate or ongoing or overt treason conspiracy -- celebrating their treason-got power and lording over the world at this dinner, delivered to them by the cowards they scare into keeping them in power. Watch on as they dine and laugh at the cowards they stalk, exploit, harm, and kill, and where UK 'royal' Hans Adam has been quoted by Dr. Greer as having said the aim of the 'royals' is to, and paraphrasing, "scare the public into a sacrifice of blood and treasure", which sounds pretty similar to Trump, and aligns with what has been going on globally.