08/15/2026
On the heels of the DOJ's Epstein files revealing Trump's Attorney General Bill Barr was "present" during the "rape" of a child or victim of Epstein, Kash Patel is back in the news as found associated with the Epstein files, specifically in a section of files referenced as the investigative holdings of all things Epstein at DOJ/FBI.
Here is what we were able to find with A.I. on this subject in the half of the EFTA DOJ files that were released.
"DOJ/FBI Memorandum Describing the Exhaustive Review
Several documents reference a July 6, 2025 memorandum from the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation describing an exhaustive review of investigative holdings:
-
DOJ-OGR-00000732 states: "On July 6, 2025, the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum describing an exhaustive review undertaken of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein (the 'Memorandum'). The Memorandum detailed the steps taken by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine whether evidence existed that could predicate an investigation into uncharged third parties. As the Memorandum concluded, no such evidence was uncovered during the review." This appears in a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. [These false statements are provably false with the evidence unlawfully-sealed by Aileen Cannon -- as his-story will soon prove -- and form the basis for the trillion dollar lawsuits we'll seek against the governments for RICO obstruction of our matter is our "intent" -- because our evidence did/does prove a massive criminal and ongoing conspiracy directly linked to and lorded over by Jeffrey Epstein.]
-
DOJ-OGR-00015037 contains identical language in a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE: "On July 6, 2025, the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum describing an exhaustive review undertaken of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein (the 'Memorandum'). The Memorandum detailed the steps taken by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine whether evidence existed that could predicate an investigation into uncharged third parties. As the Memorandum concluded, no such evidence was uncovered during the review." [These two statements are very likely provable perjury filings by whomever made or contributed to these statements to RICO obstruct our Editor's million pages of Epstein investigation materials missing from the DOJ files released. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se]
-
DOJ-OGR-00015133 page 6 references this memorandum in the context of a press release quoting a letter from the Attorney General to the FBI Director about delivering "the full and complete Epstein files."
The Unsigned July 7, 2025 Memorandum
Congressional correspondence references an unsigned memorandum released July 7, 2025:
-
EFTA00173348 page 1 is a letter from Senator Richard Durbin (Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee) to Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding "the unsigned 07/07/2025 memorandum from the DOJ and the FBI regarding the Trump Administration's 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.'" The letter notes "serious questions about the veracity of public statements regarding the Epstein-related records in DOJ's possession."[This is an admission of guilt for our matter, DOJ knowing about "serious questions about the veracity of public statements" we have been publishing here and handed over to the DOJ in 2024. Judge E. Sullivan saw through the same and demanded an unredacted record of the files be filmed to the DOJ, after stripping the government of regularity for our specific matter]
-
EFTA00173350 and EFTA00173356 (identical documents) are letters from the House Committee on the Judiciary to Attorney General Bondi stating: "On July 7, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released an unsigned memorandum regarding the Trump Administration's 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.' This memorandum made two official findings: (1) '[t]his systemic review revealed no incriminating `client list'; and (2) '[a]fter a thorough investigation, FBI investigators concluded that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on August 10, 2019.'"[This is another false or perjury-linked statement by government officials commenting on our specific case, because we gave the DOJ and DOS many lists, and under camera, including but not limited to Epstein's black book(s) and the largest qui tam retaliation complaint in US history written as civil complaint draft for the government to act on, and where A.I. would have allowed them to race through our million files' summary/summaries to readily find for us. And then disappeared from mention and from the record in a manner RICO obstructing our Editor to deprive him and his family his rights to justice under color of law. The best way to get away with crimes is for the government to illegally conceal evidence of major crimes against the United States by these unregistered foreign agents behold to at least Russia and/or the Saudis, per the DOJ's files on who Epstein approached to "handle" or "speak to" Trump.]
-
EFTA00173355 is an ECATS Summary Sheet showing Work Package ID: ECATS-2025-398054, describing correspondence "regarding the unsigned 07/07/2025 memorandum from the DOJ and the FBI regarding the Trump Administration's 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.'" It notes concerns about "the veracity of public statements regarding the Epstein-related records in DOJ's possession and the effect those questions are having on the public's ability to trust DOJ's 07/07/2025 finding that there is 'no incriminating `client list.'"
[Bingo, we win again with more evidence and admissions of intent, consciousness of guilt, concealment, harboring, destruction of records, stealing of records, RICO obstruction, perjury, and/or the like]
News Reporting on the DOJ Announcement
- EFTA00163609 page 5 contains a New York Times article (dated 08/11, by Meko) reporting that "the DOJ announced last month that it had closed an 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.' In a memo, the FBI and D01 said a review 'revealed no [text appears cut off]'" The article notes this announcement came "amid ongoing controversy and speculation surrounding Epstein's death and the government's investigation, with some critics accusing the government of hiding information about Epstein's crimes and associates."
[Yes, provable, and in fact the basis of Special Counsel Jack Smith's stolen documents case]
Context of the Review
The documents indicate this review was undertaken to determine whether evidence existed that could predicate investigations into uncharged third parties associated with Epstein. The DOJ-OGR motions indicate the review was conducted to assess whether to release grand jury transcripts, with the memorandum concluding no evidence was found to support investigations into additional individuals.
The Congressional correspondence expresses skepticism about the review's findings, particularly regarding the claim that no incriminating client list was revealed, with Senators and Representatives noting this contradicts previous public statements by Attorney General Bondi about reviewing such a list [additional evidence of intent].
These records collectively document the DOJ and FBI's official position following their review of Epstein-related investigative holdings, as well as Congressional scrutiny of those findings.
Follow-up searches to consider:
- Search for specific details about the methodology or scope of the "exhaustive review" mentioned in the July 6, 2025 memorandum
- Search for any internal DOJ or FBI documents that discuss disagreements or concerns about the review's conclusions
- Search for victim statements or reactions to the DOJ's findings from the review of investigative holdings
Bill Barr, previously met in secret with our Editor's family in violation of too many laws, including RICO and Thompson whistleblower doctrine to start, but also victim and witness intimidation to RICO obstruct, is a reasonable inference and/or provable, and formed a pattern or conspiracy, which involved Nicholas Sarkozy, Stephen Harper, Jeb Bush, GW Bush, Harlan Crow, and so many provable others "infiltrating" to "RICO influence and/or corrupt and/or obstruct our Editor and/via his family members, and vice versa per Thompson doctrine.
According to Raw Story, "Newly released FBI emails reveal Sarah Ferguson, the disgraced ex-Duchess of York, tried connecting a British socialite with Kash Patel within weeks of his swearing-in as FBI Director — right as he took charge of reviewing the case files of deceased child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
Bloomberg, which sued to force the release of Epstein-related FBI communications, reported that Ferguson relayed a message through a senior diplomat at the U.S. embassy in London in March 2025, asking the diplomat to pass along contact information for Victoria Hervey, a socialite who previously dated her ex-husband Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew.
An FBI legal attaché emailed Patel about the request the same morning.
"The Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, reached out and wanted to provide contact information for Victoria Harvey," the attaché wrote, misspelling Hervey's name.
Patel responded later that day, seemingly unfamiliar with who she was: "Thanks for the relay. Remind me who Victoria Harvey is?"
The attaché explained Patel had reportedly met both Hervey and Ferguson's longtime assistant, Antonia Marshall, at the Trump International Golf Course [not to be confused with Doral Golf Club where Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigating Trump, but not investigating himself for his financing of Epstein's Roche by 2002, was a member, a different leader in the DOJ at a different Trump golf club, for those trying to keep count of all the RICO obstruction] and had asked for their contact details there. Hervey had posted a photo with Patel and President Donald Trump two months earlier, wearing a hat reading "TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING."
[For historical accuracy here, Trump literally holds the Great(est) Deceiver "record", clocked by journalists lying 20-21 times per day on average, and so this literally proves that Trump could NOT have been right about everything, and actually proves the opposite, that he intentionally lied about almost everything. And here we have the U.S. government facilitating secret alliances with proxies for Jeffrey Epstein's British royals, caught golfing with Patel and Trump.]
An FBI spokesperson downplayed the exchange, telling Bloomberg Patel "does not know who this Victoria Hervey person is" and noting he's "taken photos with thousands of people."
The emails carry no direct mention of Epstein, but the FBI released them within a broader cache titled "Records regarding the review of the investigative holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein." The correspondence surfaced seven months before Mountbatten-Windsor was formally expelled from the Royal Family after documents showed he'd stayed in contact with Epstein far longer than previously admitted.
Separate DOJ records show Ferguson herself emailed Epstein in 2011, apologizing to him years after his 2008 sex-crime conviction, despite publicly claiming she'd cut ties.
Mountbatten-Windsor himself was arrested in connection with the Epstein offenses earlier this year. Meanwhile, Patel has come under intense scrutiny over reports of his increasingly erratic behavior on the job."
Raw Story failed to mentioned here that Jeffrey Epstein laundered money through the UK royals, specifically Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew, but also via the Qatari (Jabor and/or the other Qatari) who gave Charles II a bag of cash (only a million in cash, imaginably-discrete, and isn't that what online banking is for?) and so in that context, Kash Patel was corresponding with and/or conspiring with Epstein's money laundering and (child) sex trafficking conspirators, as an unregistered foreign agent, is a reasonable inference. But fortunately, he was only investigating them for child sex trafficking and/or elections interference via cousin Ivar's SCL, the parent spinoff company of Russia's Cambridge Analytica, transferred to the Mercers, whereafter Epstein's Steve Bannon helped operate the same, while also being part of the GOP, Trump, and Russian "engineering" of Trump by Putin, per the 11/03/2015 Sater and Cohen emails. DOJ files would later reveal that Putin was also likely blackmailed by Epstein.
Very fortunately, we have Jeffrey Epstein's, Maxwell's, Russia's, and Trump's former and current criminal defense attorneys as "watchdogs" for Britain's and Jeffrey Epstein's Kash Patel -- more accurately described as "watchers-and-dodgers" -- over Russia's, Trump's, Maxwell's, and Russia's cases -- as otherwise our country would be screwed without such credible watchdogs.
Thank goodness "our entire law enforcement buckled" to pander to a handful of treasonous child sex traffickers.
That's what you call quality hires, heroes, and credible bringers of prosecutions against Epstein investigators, or not.
Our country is clearly RICO-corrupted and obstructed by Epstein's treasonous child sex trafficking ring -- them stealing elections with enemies (Special Counsel John Durham) to grift (obvious), to child traffic and/or gang-rape and/or to child-sodomize with bloodied-tools (per two lawsuits against Trump, Leon Black, and/or Epstein), to defraud taxpayers and whistleblowers (including our Editor, but four others also, and all of them whistleblew against the same people in an overlapping manner -- the UK royals, Jeffrey Epstein, Jared Kushner, Leon Black, Donald Trump, and/or others) -- to RICO obstruct Epstein's victims even more and thus overtly -- is a reasonable inference.
