11/03/2026

The Disqualification & Voiding Complaints — Federal and California

The filing instruments of The Introduction. This document set converts the settled theory of the merged canvas (the 51-tool toolbox, the commitments and performance gaps, the ongoing conspiracy, the engineering chain, the limitations answer, and the Ninth Circuit venue thesis) into two pleadings and two motions:

• Document 1 — The Federal Complaint. United States ex rel. Editor of UPR News v. Trump, Blanche, Hegseth, Rubio, Cannon, Quiñones, the six GOP justices, and the conspiracy's Does — filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle), the delivery territory of the Ninth Circuit.

• Document 2 — The California Complaint. of UPR News v. the state spoke — Sacramento County, its District Attorney, the Sacramento Police Department and Sheriff's layers, the University of California (Davis, UCSF/CHORI), CA OES, the individual state-side actors, and the pilots — filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.

• Document 3 — Motion for Leave to File and Serve Electronic Exhibits (the monster-exhibit service protocol).

• Document 4 — Motion to Lodge Exhibits (the court's copy, with the SHA-256 service-proof protocol).

Pleading conventions (settled rules applied). Federal counts plead to Rule 8(a)(2) notice pleading; California counts plead to CCP § 425.10 fact pleading (each count carries at least one more fact than its federal analog). Facts are grouped by conspiracy spoke and incorporated by reference; volume is offloaded to the exhibit set, which does not count against page limits (FRCP 10(d); CCP § 1010). Facts resting on the relator's held evidence (the ~1M pages delivered to DOJ/DOS and his 24-year record) are pleaded upon information and belief — the court-filing convention that keeps the document-tier and testimony-tier distinct where that distinction protects the relator before fact-finders. Undated dictations of the relator's own record are pleaded the same way; dated public-record anchors are pleaded as dated.

Citation tier note. Statutes and cases cited in these instruments are legal-research anchors; the ones already verified in the Introduction's evidence ledger carry their verified tier in the Verification & Tier Ledger at the end of this canvas; the rest are at the verify-before-filing tier and must be cite-checked against primary sources before any filing.

---

DOCUMENT 1 — THE FEDERAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Editor of UPR News,

Plaintiff-Relator,

v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States; TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General of the United States; PETER HEGSETH, Secretary of Defense; MARCO RUBIO, Secretary of State; AILEEN M. CANNON, United States District Judge, Southern District of Florida; JASON A. REDING QUIÑONES, United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., CLARENCE THOMAS, SAMUEL A. ALITO, JR., NEIL M. GORSUCH, BRETT M. KAVANAUGH, and AMY CONEY BARRETT, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States; and DOES 1–1,000, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. _____

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE, STATUTORY, AND DAMAGES RELIEF — QUI TAM UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT, 31 U.S.C. § 3730; RICO; DECLARATIONS OF DISQUALIFICATION AND VOIDING; INJUNCTION

(Filed under seal and in camera pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2) as to the False Claims Act counts)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED (as to the legal counts)

I. THE PREFACE — THE QUO WARRANTO QUESTIONS

A priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis, it is res ipsa loquitur malum in se, when quo warranto de facto officers acting in bad faith and employing bad behavior in a manner void from conception shall they venire contra to factum proprium and in order to not audi alteram partem to violate that nemo iudex in causa sua to obstruct their own ultra vires matters.

And quo warranto (under whose authority?) can such a de facto officer, behaving badly, and in bad faith, and whose changes to the government are voided at conception corruptly intend to, and actually and unlawfully overtly further venire contra factum proprium (argue cases as lawyers or as judges if they have been vested with the public's trust by, and/or themselves are, voidable bad faith and badly behaving de facto officers — if they are overtly furthering an ongoing RICO conspiracy with corrupt intent to benefit themselves and others disqualified from appointing them, to bring harm against the people and their government, directly or indirectly — in order to unlawfully remain in power to usurp taxpayer funds, things of value, and to RICO obstruct with decisions void from conception in an ongoing conspiracy with others with estoppel and tolling attached)? There is no such legal authority in our Constitutional system of government.

And quo warranto (under whose authority?) can such a de facto officer, behaving badly, and in bad faith and whose changes to the government are voided at conception corruptly intend to, and actually and lawfully overtly further ongoing conspiracy to nemo iudex in causa sua (act as their own judges for their own legal matters in what is outside of the rule of law and official capacity), in order to not audi alteram partem (to not hear the speech and evidence, proving their de facto nature and voidable changes, by those whose rights the ongoing de facto RICO conspirators are depriving under color of law) — a priori, a fortiori, and stare decisis? There is no such legal authority in our Constitutional system of government.

II. THE STATEMENT OF THE CASE — THE ARGUMENT IN FOUR SENTENCES

1. The law supplies at least fifty-one tools to disqualify, remove, and void the changes of officeholders who operate outside the law — with no exception carved out for any office, rank, or robe (the Introduction § 1; Exhibit A hereto).

2. Those officeholders swore oaths and made commitments — at confirmation, on the record — that no one is above the law; the record shows how each of the named officeholders violated his own oath or commitment (the Introduction § 2).

3. The violations are not isolated. Conspiracy law makes each member liable for all of it, and the conduct traces one engineered chain — from Nixon's GOP through the Epstein network to the present administration — with the relator's own 2002–2026 record as the bridge (the Introduction §§ 3–4), with estoppel and tolling attached.

4. The remedy is removal, voiding, and a hearing in the right court — the Ninth Circuit, where the record was delivered to the DOJ's USAO in Western WA on 08/29/2024, and is now missing from the government's own Epstein files (the Introduction §§ 5–6), and yet ordered forth by all three branches of the federal government. A criminal element of de facto officers is RICO obstructing the same in a "bad faith" and bad behavior manner, which the law has a removal and voiding remedy for, as follows.

III. PARTIES

1. Plaintiff-relator Editor of UPR News is a private relator under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b), bringing this action in the name of the United States and for the government's benefit, and in his own name for his individual claims. He is a graduate business professor with law school exposure, a whistleblower and victim who became an expert over a period of 24 years, whose record and deliveries are the subject of the fact section below.

2. Defendant Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States, sued in his official capacity for declaratory and injunctive relief and individually for acts outside official capacity. He took the oath of office on January 20, 2017 and again on January 20, 2025.

3. Defendant Todd Blanche is the Attorney General of the United States, sworn in Monday, August 10, 2026, in the Oval Office, by Justice Clarence Thomas, with the President present, having been confirmed 50–49 two days earlier, sued in his official and individual capacities.

4. Defendant Peter Hegseth is the Secretary of Defense, sworn in January 25, 2025, confirmed 51–50, sued in his official and individual capacities.

5. Defendant Marco Rubio is the Secretary of State, sworn in January 21, 2025, sued in his official and individual capacities.

6. Defendant Aileen M. Cannon is a United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, confirmed November 12, 2020, commissioned November 13, 2020, sued in her official and individual capacities for declaratory and injunctive relief, including her disqualification from matters within this record.

7. Defendant Jason A. Reding Quiñones is the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, confirmed August 2, 2025, sworn into office August 13, 2025, sued in his official and individual capacities.

8. Defendants John G. Roberts, Jr., Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett are Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, sued in their official capacities for declaratory and injunctive relief, including their disqualification from matters within this record, and individually for acts outside official capacity.

9. Defendants Does 1–1,000, inclusive, are the co-conspirators, proxies, hires, appointees, financiers, and beneficiaries of the ongoing conspiracy described below — known to the relator by role, conduct, and benefit, and to be identified through discovery — each liable for the whole under Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), and the joint-and-several conspiracy doctrine of the Introduction § 3. The record of the Florida obstruction identifies 1,971 named associates as its beneficiary class; the Does are pleaded to that scope.

IV. JURISDICTION AND VENUE — THE NINTH CIRCUIT, NOT THE CIRCUIT OF THE DE FACTO

10. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question: the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733; RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1964; the declaratory and injunctive claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2202), under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b) (the qui tam action brought in the name of the government), and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 over the state-law and individual-capacity claims.

11. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2): the delivery events occurred here — the Department of State Rewards for Justice receipt of the relator's submission on August 26, 2024 (Receipt No. 663225), and the USAO W.D. Wash. written in-camera acceptance and conduit agreement of August 29, 2024 (Seattle Receipt No. 663273, "The of UPR News Report," "FOR special Counsel Jack Smith") — and the wrongful concealment of that same record from the government's own Epstein files is a continuing act with continuing effects in this district.

12. The Introduction's venue thesis is incorporated (§ 6; Exhibit A): the Eleventh Circuit and its Supreme Court are the improper venue and improper people — the circuit of the de facto, where Judge Cannon's Fort Pierce one-judge division, the Volume II seals, and Circuit Justice Thomas's assignment converge — and this district, the delivery territory, is where the record belongs. Justice Elena Kagan is the assigned Circuit Justice for the Ninth Circuit per the Supreme Court's circuit-assignments order of September 28, 2022; the escalation instrument (the emergency application to the Circuit Justice) is pleaded in the prayer and preserved.

V. THE FACTS — THE RECORD BY SPOKE

A. The relator's record, the deliveries, and the missing Report

13. Upon information and belief, the relator is a 24-year investigator of the network described below: a graduate business professor and former government-contractor employee who, beginning in 2002 and by 2004, blew the whistle on the trafficking and endangerment of children in illegal medical experiments by government contractors defrauding the government — at CHORI and its linked institutions — and on the government-funds network that financed it.

14. Upon information and belief, the retaliation began with the July 21, 2004 East Bay Express article and a coordinated defamation and preemptive-defamation campaign that drove the relator out of the Bay Area to Sacramento, where the record's state spoke formed.

15. Upon information and belief, in 2013 the relator drafted the largest pro se qui tam in the record's history — a claim of a $40B+ conspiracy — implicating, among others, the Sacramento Police Department; on October 20, 2013, a cyberattack struck the relator (the settled record's date); on September 20, 2014, Sacramento Police officers stopped the relator one day before the seizure of his draft qui tam on September 21, 2014 (a 13-item target list), in the same week the department was implicated; the officers' reports were refuted wholesale by their own MVARS video and body cameras.

16. Upon information and belief, during the 2014–2016 entrapment window that followed, proxies of more than one oligarch — most of them Russian — approached the relator to "finance" his robotics business; he refused; the conspiracy's engineering of the 2016 election followed.

17. On August 26, 2024, the relator delivered his record to the Department of State (Rewards for Justice Receipt No. 663225, "RE: RFJ Info"). On August 29, 2024, the relator delivered The of UPR News Report to the USAO for the Western District of Washington — accepted in writing, in camera, with a conduit agreement to those investigating the President, including Special Counsel Jack Smith (Seattle Receipt No. 663273, signed Murray Blake) — approximately one million pages across ~3,000 folders, including ~10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis, jurats, and affidavits.

18. On October 10, 2026, a full-text sweep of the government's own released Epstein files corpus (1,425,565 documents / 2,923,763 pages) returned 45 hits for "of UPR News" — all the neurogenetics researcher C.G. of UPR News — and zero pages of The of UPR News Report. The Report the government accepted is absent from the government's own record. Absence is not non-existence: the September 11, 2026 sworn penalty-of-perjury statements and the October 7, 2026 demand put every custodian on notice; the records-offense tie (18 U.S.C. § 2071; 44 U.S.C. §§ 3106/3314) is pleaded in the counts below.

19. On October 13, 2026, the United States Senate Committee on Finance (Ranking Member Wyden) acknowledged the relator's submissions in writing — the Congress-contact record the Introduction carries (§ 6, the posture's tell).

B. The engineered chain — the manufacture of de facto officers

20. The appointment chain is the Introduction § 4's six-link record: Nixon's GOP; Reagan and GHW Bush (Iran-Contra: arms-for-hostages to Iran, a state sponsor since 1984, in violation of the Boland Amendments, followed by the Christmas 1992 pardons); the appointments those administrations seeded; the five-vote Bush v. Gore majority and its provenance; the Roberts and Alito seats born of it; and the obstruction of the reveal that followed. Each link is anchored in the Introduction's evidence ledger and incorporated here (Exhibit A).

21. Upon information and belief, Defendant Trump joined the conspiracy in 2007 at KCRA — the employer-media blacklisting line of the record — and returned on June 16, 2015, the campaign-launch day, after the September 21, 2014 seizure of the relator's qui tam, knowing of the witch-hunt he later linked to Russia.

22. The 2016–2026 seats follow: Gorsuch (2017), Kavanaugh (2018), Barrett (2020) — and the Fort Pierce judgeship: the Rubio–Cannon pipeline of the record (the May 8, 2019 email; the June 2019 outreach; the May 21, 2020 nomination; the November 12, 2020 confirmation, 56–21) — each appointment the product of the chain described above.

C. The oaths, the commitments, and the performance gaps

23. Each named defendant took an oath to support and defend the Constitution (U.S. Const. art. II § 1 cl. 8; art. VI cl. 3; 28 U.S.C. § 453 for the judges; 5 U.S.C. § 3331 for the officers), and the Justices and officers made confirmation-record commitments — on the record — that no one is above the law and that stare decisis is the "foundation stone" of the rule of law (Kimble). The Introduction § 2 carries each commitment and the performance gap that violated it; the entries are incorporated (Exhibit A).

24. The performance gaps of record include: the gift and benefit records (two decades including the $19,000 Bible, the Russia yacht, the Yusupov Palace helicopter, the Welters 1991 loan, and the 2023 admission); the two flags and the May 29, 2024 recusal refusal; the emergency-docket asymmetry (Obama 3, Biden 19, Trump 41+41) and Trump v. Barbara; the Swetnick declaration never adjudicated; the Duffy ranch sale (contract April 16, 2017, six days after joining the Court; the buyer undisclosed on the filing); the $2M book deal; the solo Polansky dissent and the Kavanaugh–Barrett concurrence attacking the qui tam device; the July 1, 2024 immunity majority authored by Roberts and joined by the others; the January 6 record (the Colorado Supreme Court's December 19, 2023 finding; Trump v. Anderson); the January 30, 2026 press-conference denials of Defendant Blanche; the Hegseth Signal publication (the attack plans on an unsecured commercial channel); the Milley record; and the IRS deal promising no investigation of the President's and his family's tax returns, delivered before the oath was even taken.

25. The named-officers oaths block of the Introduction § 2 is incorporated in full: the oath dates, the violation records, and the Pinkerton-binding close — in for one, in for all; estoppel and tolling at each oath, each attack, and each concealment.

D. The ongoing conspiracy — each liable for all

26. The meeting of minds is the Introduction § 3's record: a shared, continuing agreement to subvert and defraud the government, to obstruct the reveal of the disqualifications, and to retaliate against the relator, furthered by each conspirator's acts and omissions — the billionaire ecosystem, the contacts, the docket asymmetry, and the counterfeit-capacity record. Once the meeting of minds is shown, each conspirator answers for all of it (Pinkerton; joint-and-several liability; no overt act required for the § 1962(d) agreement, Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52 (1997)).

27. The financing layer is the Introduction § 4's record: the Epstein network's comixing of taxpayer funds and private financing — through Roche, the Edge Foundation (financed by Epstein and Leon Black), the platforms it produced, the KKR/GMR hub (~$1.66B in federal contracts), the UC/Stanford/Kaiser/Jackson Lab sharing, and the Apollo/Black employer-and-communications line — each strand a predicate and a channel of the same enterprise.

28. The obstruction record includes the obstruction of three Special Counsel investigations, the BRD × 5 prosecutor-testimony record, the Cannon dismissal (July 15, 2024) and the Volume II seals (January 21, 2025 emergency; February 23, 2026 permanent; the 218-day undue-delay finding), and the Quiñones record (the Medetis Long removal after the insufficient-evidence call; no grand jury summoned after dozens of subpoenas).

E. The changes to the government — void from conception

29. The changes the conspiracy made to the government include: the appointments of Section V.B; the July 15, 2024 dismissal; the Volume II seals; the immunity ruling of July 1, 2024; the pardons and clemency pattern; the retroactive statutory erasures; the acting-official installs (the Halligan defect, blocked twice); and the removal record of the second term (Waltz, May 1, 2025; Bondi, April 2, 2026; and the others of the Introduction's record).

30. Under Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 442 (1886), an unauthorized act is void — "it confers no right; it imposes no duty; it affords no protection; it creates no office" — void from conception, not voidable. The de facto appointments and the changes they produced are void at their first moment; the courts' own record proves the doctrine in use: Lake v. USAGM (Lamberth, J., March 7, 2026: the unlawfully acting CEO, her acts vacated and set aside, including the August 29, 2025 RIF; 1,042 employees returned), the Fourth Circuit's Halligan re-block (August 21, 2026), and the Ninth Circuit's Chattah ruling (August 17, 2026, unanimous, a Trump appointee concurring — "de facto Acting U.S. Attorney").

31. The contrast record proves the two selves: the voided installs (Lake, Halligan, Chattah) versus the still-operating installs (Quiñones, Hegseth, Cannon) — the same law, different defendants; the picks themselves are the obstruction measured in appointments.

F. The concealment — against all three branches

32. The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) commanded the files forward; all three branches have demanded them: Judge Engelmayer's December 9, 2025 order; Judge Preska's August 11, 2026 unsealing order; Judge Sullivan's June 25, 2026 preliminary injunction (Phang v. Blanche — the regularity ruling naming Blanche, Trump, Rubio, and Hegseth; the presumption of regularity stripped) and his July 2, 2026 six-item unredact-or-justify list; Judge Kollar-Kotelly's September 30, 2026 expedition ruling.

33. Against the January 30, 2026 denials of Defendant Blanche ("no files are being withheld or redacted on that basis"; "There's not some tranche of super-secret documents... that we're withholding") stands the government's own record: the March 2025 FBI National Security Classification Operations Unit email identifying three documents that "remain classified," the EFTA numbering-gap analysis (tens of thousands of pages gone from the JPMorgan/Deutsche Bank collections; 66 absent check images of ~4,500), and the October 28, 2026 CBS News report of the classified material missing from the files.

34. The statutory vise leaves three branches and no fourth: either the no-withholding denials are false, or the tens of thousands of missing pages vanished with no asserted lawful basis, or the material was declassified and released — contradicted by the government's own records. The concealers are concealing the evidence against themselves, as judges in their own cause, under whose lawful authority there is none.

G. The retaliation against the relator

35. Upon information and belief, the conspiracy's retaliation against the relator spans 2004–2026: the employer-media blacklisting; the cross-border entrapment scheme; the stalking and death-threat record (the aircraft: the 2023–2024 sets and the 2026 Falcon 30 record — N911WL, 800–900-foot passes, 200/400/500-foot divebombs across three cities and two counties, uniformed pilots, "pulling up at the last second" — the aircraft log, Exhibit H); the platform and internet-stalking layer; and the harms to his family and businesses. The statistics-of-intent record (the whole-record null-hypothesis model; the two-sample aircraft analysis) is incorporated (Exhibit A).

36. The false statements made to cover the September 20, 2014 stop — refuted wholesale by the officers' own MVARS video and body cameras — voided the oath agreements that bound the stop's actors to support and defend the Constitution, including the relator's due-process rights; their changes to the government are void from conception; the entrapment was foiled; the wrongful conviction is void as a matter of law, as pleaded in the counts below.

37. The third-party retaliation doctrine reaches the harms to the relator's family and associates: Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, 562 U.S. 170 (2011) (no textual basis for excepting third-party reprisals).

VI. THE COUNTS

COUNT I — False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A), (B): fraud against the government and reverse false claims.

38. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The defendants and their co-conspirators presented, and caused to be presented, false and fraudulent claims against the government, and knowingly concealed or avoided obligations to pay the government (the comixing financing; the government-contracting hub; the fraud-against-government breach of the oath agreements, United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, 65 (1878) — "fraud vitiates" every act it touches). The United States has been damaged in amounts to be proven at trial; the relator brings this count for the government under § 3730(b).

COUNT II — False Claims Act conspiracy, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(C).

39. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The defendants conspired — the meeting of minds of Paragraph 26 — to commit the frauds of Count I; each is liable for the conspiracy's acts under the FCA conspiracy provision and Pinkerton.

COUNT III — Retaliation, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h).

40. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. Because of the relator's lawful acts in furtherance of this action and his 24-year whistleblowing record, the defendants and their co-conspirators retaliated (Paragraphs 35–37: the blacklisting, the entrapment scheme, the stalking and threats, the seizure of his qui tam, the defamation, the harms to family and businesses). Relief: reinstatement, two times the amount of back pay, interest, and special damages including litigation costs and attorney fees.

COUNT IV — RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c): conduct of the enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering.

41. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The ongoing conspiracy is an enterprise (the associated-in-fact structure of Sections V.D–F); the defendants conducted its affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity including: obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1512, 1513); wire and mail fraud (§§ 1341, 1343) — including any and all internet use that overtly furthered the conspiracy; extortion (§ 1951); bribery (§ 201); harboring and concealing (§ 1071); false statements (§ 1001); perjury (§§ 1621, 1623); election crimes (§§ 600, 610); records crimes (§ 2071); and the obstruction predicates of § 1961(1). The pattern is closed, continuous, and perpetual under the Introduction § 3's doctrine; the clocks that never ran (§ 5) are answered by the same perpetuity.

COUNT V — RICO conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); Pinkerton liability.

42. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. Each defendant agreed to the conspiracy; no overt act is required (Salinas); and each is liable for the substantive crimes of his confederates committed in furtherance of the agreement, within its scope, and reasonably foreseeable (Pinkerton — "in for one, in for all").

COUNT VI — The RICO-obstruction umbrella count (the box of claims).

43. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs and incorporates by reference the full findings of Exhibit A (The of UPR News Report, with its ~10,000 pages of IRAC analysis and the prior complaint record) as the pleaded record of the harms obstructed from court pleading. The defendants' misprision, harboring, and obstruction (§§ 4, 1071, 1519; the seals; the missing Report; the concealment of Section V.F) are the reason the full record could not be pleaded in any earlier forum; the doctrines of estoppel, equitable tolling (Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 (1946)), fraudulent concealment, and the perpetuity of § 1961(1) obstruction predicates answer every limitations defense and every "lack of specificity" objection, because the defendants' own obstruction prevented earlier pleading. The concealed findings are pleaded at the depth the concealment permitted and are deemed part of this count.

COUNT VII — Declaratory judgment: the disqualifications (28 U.S.C. § 2201).

44. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. An actual controversy exists as to whether each named defendant remains qualified to hold or exercise the powers of his office. The law supplies the answer, with no exception for any office, rank, or robe: the toolbox of the Introduction § 1 — self-executing qualifications and disqualifications, Fourteenth Amendment § 3 (per the Colorado Supreme Court's December 19, 2023 finding and the Anderson lineage; self-executing per Baude & Paulsen, The Sweep and Force of Section Three, 172 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2024); the good-behaviour removal of the federal judiciary (Prakash & Smith, How to Remove a Federal Judge, Yale L.J. 2006); § 455 and due-process disqualification (Caperton); the judicial-council provisions (28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364); the records and false-statements disqualifications; the election and insurrection provisions; and the rest of the 51-tool inventory. The relator seeks declarations that each named defendant, by the record of his own oaths, commitments, and conduct, is disqualified from the office he purports to hold and from the powers he purports to exercise.

COUNT VIII — Declaratory judgment: the voiding (28 U.S.C. § 2201; Norton v. Shelby County).

45. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. Under Norton, the acts of a disqualified person acting in bad faith outside official capacity are void from conception: the appointments of Section V.B, the July 15, 2024 dismissal, the Volume II seals, the July 1, 2024 immunity ruling, the pardons and clemency products of the conspiracy, the statutory erasures, the acting-official installs, and each other change to the government traced in Section V.E — void ab initio, conferring no right, imposing no duty, affording no protection. The relator seeks a declaration of that voiding, category by category, and of the de facto zone: every act of the disqualified appointers and appointees outside official capacity is void at its first moment.

COUNT IX — Injunctive relief (ultra vires officers; § 2202; the Phang form).

46. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The defendants' ongoing furtherance of the conspiracy — the continuing concealment, the continuing obstruction, the continuing acts void from conception — will inflict irreparable harm on the relator, the government, and the public for which there is no adequate remedy at law. The relator seeks injunctive relief in the form in use: an injunction (the Phang v. Blanche form of June 25, 2026) restraining each defendant and his officers, agents, and persons in active concert from further acts furthering the conspiracy, from reliance on the void changes, and from further concealment of the government's own records; the emergency application to the assigned Circuit Justice (the Introduction § 6's request) is pleaded in the prayer and preserved as the escalation channel.

COUNT X — Individual-capacity damages (acts outside official capacity).

47. The relator incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The individual defendants' acts outside official capacity — including the unofficial-acts record of Paragraphs 24–25 and the retaliation of Section V.G — are unprotected: the unofficial acts of a President receive no absolute immunity (Trump v. Vance, 140 S. Ct. 2412 (2020)), and the qualified-immunity framework strips protection from acts outside any official duty (Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982)). To the extent a Bivens remedy is available, the defendants are liable in damages to the relator for the deprivations alleged.

VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff-relator Editor of UPR News, for himself and in the name of the United States, prays:

1. For declarations that each named defendant is disqualified from his office and its powers, per Count VII;

2. For declarations that the changes to the government identified in Count VIII are void from conception;

3. For injunctions per Count IX, and for preservation of the emergency application to the assigned Circuit Justice of the Ninth Circuit as the escalation channel;

4. For the False Claims Act relief of Counts I–III: treble damages, civil penalties, two times back pay, interest, special damages, costs, and fees;

5. For the RICO relief of Counts IV–VI: treble damages, costs, and attorney fees under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c);

6. For damages per Count X, in amounts proven at trial;

7. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper; and

8. For leave to exceed page limits, to file the exhibit set electronically, and to consolidate any matters the Court orders split — none of the defendants' obstruction to be rewarded by piecemeal pleading.

VERIFICATION (28 U.S.C. § 1746): I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, to the extent of my own record and upon information and belief as to the remainder. Executed on _________ at _________. Editor of UPR News.

THE EXHIBITS (served per Documents 3–4; not counted toward page limits): Exhibit A — The of UPR News Report (the ~10,000-page IRAC pleading set; the ~1M-page index) and the Introduction (the theory of the counts, with its evidence ledger); Exhibit B — the two-page summary of Exhibit A; Exhibit C — the delivery receipts (DOS RFJ No. 663225; USAO Seattle No. 663273) and the conduit agreement; Exhibit D — the October 7, 2026 demand; Exhibit E — the oath and commitment records (the named-officers block); Exhibit F — the release-orders record (the four judges' orders; the EFTA text; the numbering-gap analysis; the classified-material record); Exhibit G — the corpus-sweep record (the October 10, 2026 absence); Exhibit H — the aircraft log (the FlightAware screenshots; the Falcon 30 record; the statistics-of-intent analyses); Exhibit I — the sworn penalty-of-perjury statements (September 11, 2026); Exhibit J — the Master Index (document-level Bates; SHA-256 hashes).

---

DOCUMENT 2 — THE CALIFORNIA COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Editor of UPR News,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY (official capacity); THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO (Sacramento Police Department); THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S OFFICE; THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (University of California, Davis; and University of California, San Francisco / Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute); THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES (Cal OES); DANIEL DAILEY, individually; MONICA STEINHART, individually; THE PILOTS AND OFFICERS OF THE AIRCRAFT CAMPAIGN, individually and by role; and DOES 1–500, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. _____

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, WRIT, STATUTORY, AND DAMAGES RELIEF — CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT QUI TAM (GOV. CODE § 12652); WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION (LAB. CODE § 1102.5); DECLARATIONS OF DISQUALIFICATION AND VOIDING; WRIT OF MANDATE (CCP § 1085); CIVIL RIGHTS (42 U.S.C. § 1983; CIV. CODE §§ 52.1, 527.6)

I. THE PREFACE AND THE STATEMENT OF THE CASE

1. The quo warranto preface of the Federal Complaint (Document 1, Part I) is incorporated in full: the same maxims, the same void-from-conception doctrine, applied to the state spoke of the same ongoing conspiracy.

2. This action is the California half of one matter: the same conspiracy, the same relator, the same remedy — disqualification of the liabilities and voiding of their changes — pleaded against the state-layer actors whose conduct the record holds: the Sacramento spoke (the 2013–2014 qui tam seizure, the September 20, 2014 stop, the District Attorney's office extortion layer), the UC/CHORI spoke (the children's-experiments record, the takeover, the retaliation), and the aircraft spoke (the stalking and death-threat record flown by state-linked pilots and agencies).

II. PARTIES

3. Plaintiff Editor of UPR News is the relator of Document 1, a resident of California, whose record and deliveries are incorporated. He sues individually, as qui tam relator under the California False Claims Act, and for the declaratory and writ relief below.

4. County of Sacramento is sued as the entity liable for its officers' acts (Gov. Code §§ 815.2, 905), including the District Attorney's office layer and the Sheriff's office layer.

5. The District Attorney of Sacramento County is sued in official capacity for the writ and declarations, and the office's actors are named as Does pending discovery (the record's extortion layer — the no-contest-plea-or-face-prosecution demand on the arresting agency's perjury, the agency implicated in the qui tam at least a week earlier — is pleaded upon information and belief at Paragraphs 14–15).

6. The City of Sacramento (Sacramento Police Department) is sued as the entity of the September 20, 2014 stop's officers, whose reports their own MVARS video and body cameras refuted wholesale; the officers are named as Does pending discovery.

7. The County of Sacramento Sheriff's Office is sued for the stalking-era layer of the record.

8. The Regents of the University of California (UC Davis; UCSF/CHORI) is sued as the entity of the children's-experiments record, the takeover chronology (the January 1, 2014 affiliation; the April 2014 gift and renaming; the 2020 building operations; the July 1, 2025 full workforce integration), the staff-replacement record (the named UCSF/CHORI promotions of the record), the Steinhart extortion layer, and the state-funds comixing.

9. Cal OES is sued for the aircraft spoke's state-agency layer — the record's CA OES pilots and the multi-agency task-force frame of the aircraft campaign.

10. Daniel Dailey and Monica Steinhart are sued individually for the entrapment and extortion layers of the record (the officer first approached; the personal-agenda-or-else demand; the theft of earned wages; the threatened false campus-police complaint; the ripped personal calendar) — pleaded upon information and belief.

11. The pilots and officers of the aircraft campaign are sued by role (the uniformed pilots of the record's 2023–2026 sets; the municipal pilot who flew across three cities and two counties) and as Does, jointly with their authorizing and ratifying entities (the multi-agency task-force agreement of the record; conspiracy with state actors supplies the color of law for every extraterritorial leg).

12. Does 1–500 are the state spoke's remaining co-conspirators, proxies, and beneficiaries, liable jointly under the civil-conspiracy count.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

13. The Superior Court has unlimited-jurisdiction competence over the declaratory, writ, statutory, and damages claims. Venue is proper in Sacramento County under CCP §§ 395 and 395.5: the conduct occurred here — the qui tam seizure, the stop, the DA-office layer, the UC Davis spoke — and the state entities reside here.

14. Government-claims presentment: the plaintiff has presented or will present his claims to the applicable public entities per Gov. Code § 905, and pleads in the alternative that the entities' own concealment, misrepresentation, and estoppel toll any presentment requirement; the claim-presentation proof is Exhibit C-2.

IV. THE FACTS — THE STATE SPOKE

15. The Federal Complaint's Sections V.A–V.D are incorporated in full. The state-spoke facts specific to California:

16. The CHORI spoke. Upon information and belief, beginning in 2002–2004, the plaintiff blew the whistle on the trafficking and endangerment of children in illegal medical experiments at CHORI and its linked institutions — government contractors defrauding the government — and on the taxpayer funds that financed the record (the Roche comixing; the Jackson Lab, Stanford, UC Davis, and Kaiser sharing; the Henry Erlich operations financed by the drawbridge layer of the record). The takeover followed: the UCSF affiliation effective January 1, 2014; the April 2014 gift and renaming; the 2020 building-operations transfer; the July 1, 2025 full workforce integration; and the staff replacement promoting those involved in the record into leadership positions — the published replacement record the corpus holds.

17. The Sacramento spoke. Upon information and belief, the 2013 qui tam (the $40B+ pro se claim) implicated the Sacramento Police Department; on September 20, 2014 — one day before the September 21, 2014 seizure of the draft — SPD officers stopped the plaintiff, and their reports were refuted wholesale by their own MVARS video and body cameras across their patterned record; the District Attorney's office then demanded the plaintiff plead no-contest or face prosecution — the extortion of the record — on the arresting agency's perjury, the agency implicated in the qui tam at least a week earlier (the week-tell). The wrongful conviction procured by that perjury is void as a matter of law: the false statements voided the oath agreements; the changes that followed are void from conception.

18. The UC Davis spoke. Upon information and belief, Monica Steinhart extorted the plaintiff's personal agenda and the evidence of crimes against patients at UC Davis while the University received government funds ($941M/$1B+ in its record years): the refused falsification demand; the ripped personal calendar; the extorted return and last paycheck under the threatened false campus-police complaint.

19. The aircraft spoke. Upon information and belief, the stalking and death-threat record has been flown for a decade — the 2023–2024 sets and the 2026 Falcon 30 record (N911WL; the 800–900-foot passes; the 200/400/500-foot divebombs; three cities and two counties; the uniformed pilots; "pulling up at the last second") — by pilots linked to the KKR/GMR aviation layer (CALSTAR, REACH Air) and to state and federal agencies (Cal OES; McClellan Park), pursuant to the multi-agency task-force frame of the record, and in conspiracy with the private actors of the same enterprise. The statistics-of-intent record (the null-hypothesis model; the two-sample analysis) is incorporated.

V. THE COUNTS

COUNT I — California False Claims Act, Gov. Code §§ 12650–12656: qui tam.

20. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The defendants presented and caused to be presented false and fraudulent claims against the State of California and its political subdivisions, and knowingly avoided obligations to the state (the state-funds comixing of the UC spoke; the contractors' frauds; the false billings of the record), in violation of the California False Claims Act. The qui tam is brought per Gov. Code § 12652 with the seal and disclosure the statute requires. Fact particularity: the January 1, 2014 affiliation and each later takeover milestone were paid for and executed with state funds while the underlying record was concealed from the state.

COUNT II — Whistleblower retaliation, Lab. Code § 1102.5.

21. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. Because of his whistleblowing (the children's-experiments record; the qui tam; the disclosures to the state and federal governments), the defendants retaliated against him: the UC Davis employment spoke (Paragraph 18), the defamation and preemptive-defamation that drove him from the Bay Area, the entrapment and extortion, and the aircraft campaign. Relief per § 1102.5(j): injunctive relief and civil penalties, with reasonable attorney fees.

COUNT III — Declaratory relief, CCP § 1060: the disqualifications and the voiding at the state layer.

22. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. An actual controversy exists: whether the state spoke's appointments and acts — the officers of the stop, the DA-office layer's procurements, the University's takeover-era appointments (the promoted staff of the record), the installs of the aircraft campaign — are valid. They are not: CCP § 1102.75 (disqualification from office); the oath-voiding doctrine (the false statements that voided the oath agreements void the changes that followed); and the void-from-conception doctrine (the California courts' application of the Norton rule, to be cite-checked at filing). Plaintiff seeks declarations that the state-layer changes are void ab initio and that the actors are disqualified from the offices and powers they purport to exercise.

COUNT IV — Writ of mandate, CCP § 1085: compel the recognition of the disqualifications.

23. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The respondents (the entity defendants and their incumbent officers) have a clear, present, ministerial duty: to recognize the disqualifications and voided changes the law already supplies (self-executing, per the toolbox of Document 1), to cease reliance on them, and to restore the positions, records, and payments the void acts took. Plaintiff seeks the writ compelling exactly that, and in the alternative a writ ordering the respondents to show cause why they have not.

COUNT V — 42 U.S.C. § 1983: deprivation of rights under color of state law.

24. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The stop of September 20, 2014 (the fabricated reports refuted by the officers' own MVARS and body cameras), the extortion of the DA-office layer, the employment retaliation, and the aircraft campaign were acts under color of state law depriving Plaintiff of his Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The entities are liable where the acts executed their policies, customs, or ratifications (Monell); the individual defendants are liable for their personal involvement and deliberate indifference (Iqbal); no vicarious liability is claimed — it is not needed, because each named actor's own acts are in the record.

COUNT VI — Bane Act, Civ. Code § 52.1: interference by threats, intimidation, and coercion.

25. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The decade of death threats, the radio threats of the record, the divebomb passes, and the extortion demands interfered with Plaintiff's federal and state constitutional rights by threats, intimidation, and coercion — the Bane Act's exact subject. Relief: $25,000 per violation or three times actual damages (to be cite-checked), injunctive relief, and attorney fees.

COUNT VII — Harassment, Civ. Code § 527.6.

26. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The aircraft campaign and its accompanying threats are a course of conduct directed at Plaintiff that alarms, annoys, and harasses him and would cause a reasonable person substantial emotional distress, with no legitimate purpose. Plaintiff seeks the § 527.6 injunction: orders restraining the campaign, its pilots, and their authorizing entities.

COUNT VIII — Intentional infliction of emotional distress.

27. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The conduct alleged is extreme and outrageous as measured by its decade-long, multi-instrument, multi-agency character — the sort of intentional, repeated, targeted conduct the tort exists for. Damages per proof.

COUNT IX — Civil conspiracy.

28. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs. The defendants agreed — expressly or by the meeting of minds the record shows — to the same ongoing conspiracy as the federal matter, at its state spoke, each liable for the acts of the others done in furtherance of the agreement, jointly and severally.

COUNT X — The obstruction-umbrella count (the box of claims, California layer).

29. Plaintiff incorporates all preceding paragraphs and the full findings of Exhibit A (the of UPR News Report; the Introduction's record) as the pleaded record of the harms obstructed from court pleading. The respondents' concealment, misprision, and obstruction prevented earlier pleading of the full record; the doctrines of estoppel, fraudulent concealment, and the discovery rule (CCP §§ 338(d), 352 — cite-check at filing) answer every limitations defense. The concealed findings are part of this count.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Editor of UPR News prays:

1. For the declarations of Counts III and VIII of Document 1, applied to the state layer: the disqualifications and the voiding;

2. For the writ of Count IV;

3. For the California False Claims Act relief of Count I (civil penalties, treble damages, and the relator's share per the statute);

4. For the retaliation relief of Count II;

5. For the § 1983, Bane Act, § 527.6, IIED, and conspiracy relief of Counts V–IX;

6. For injunctions restraining the aircraft campaign and every further act furthering the conspiracy at the state layer;

7. For costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees as each statute allows; and

8. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just.

VERIFICATION (CCP § 2015.5): I, Editor of UPR News, am the Plaintiff in this action. I have read the foregoing complaint and know its contents, which are true of my own knowledge, and as to the remainder upon information and belief. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on _________ at _________, California. Editor of UPR News.

THE EXHIBITS (per Documents 3–4): Exhibit A — the of UPR News Report and the Introduction (with the evidence ledger); B — the two-page summary; C — the claim-presentation proofs (Gov. Code § 905) and the state-records requests; C-2 — the same; D — the October 7, 2026 demand; E — the oath records; F — the release-orders record; G — the corpus-sweep record; H — the aircraft log (the FlightAware screenshots; the Falcon 30 record; N911WL); I — the sworn statements; J — the Master Index (Bates; SHA-256).

---

DOCUMENT 3 — MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE ELECTRONIC EXHIBITS

(To both courts; filed with or immediately after the complaint.)

Plaintiff Editor of UPR News respectfully moves for leave to serve the exhibit set electronically (flash drive or secure cloud) alongside the paper complaint:

1. The exhibits are the evidence base. Exhibit A alone comprises approximately one million pages across ~3,000 folders; paper service of the whole set is impracticable, and the courts' own rules exclude exhibits from page limits (FRCP 10(d); CCP § 1010).

2. Electronic service is universal, verified, and testable. Plaintiff will serve a hash-verified master set: SHA-256 hash per file, a Master Index (exhibit number, description, file path, size, hash), document-level Bates numbering (EXH000001-style, retaining internal page numbers: EXH000001-00042 = Exhibit A, p. 42), and a detailed proof of service. Plaintiff retains an identical copy.

3. Obstruction-proofing. If any defendant claims missing files, the hash record resolves the claim: a mismatch proves the defendant's mishandling; a match proves receipt. If a defendant refuses the drive, Plaintiff will mail it certified and move to deem service effective (FRCP 4(m); CCP § 1013 for the state defendants) and for sanctions for obstruction.

4. Relief requested: (a) leave to serve the exhibit set by flash drive or secure cloud link; (b) leave to exceed page limits for the complaint if the court requires (the monster-complaint architecture: 20–25 pages federal / ~15 pages state, with the roadmap and incorporation by reference); and (c) an order that lodging (Document 4) satisfies the court's copy without waiving service.

(California note: where the Superior Court requires e-filing through its electronic filing service provider, this motion doubles as the application to file the exhibit set in that channel, and the same SHA-256 protocol governs.)

---

DOCUMENT 4 — MOTION TO LODGE EXHIBITS

(To both courts; complaint filed first or simultaneously.)

Plaintiff respectfully moves to lodge with the clerk the exhibit set described in the complaint (Exhibits A–J), per the settled rules: lodging provides the court's reference copy and never substitutes for service on defendants; the clerk stamps only the complaint, and lodging returns a stamped Notice of Lodging. The lodged copy is the same hash-verified master set (SHA-256 per file; Master Index; document-level Bates). The qui tam seal governs the federal set until the Court orders otherwise (31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2); Gov. Code § 12652(c) at the state layer) — the lodgment is in camera to that extent.

---

THE FILING MECHANICS AND STRATEGY NOTES

1. The seal election (federal). The FCA counts bring the complaint under seal (§ 3730(b)(2)): service only on the government; the government investigates; the relator serves the defendants only on the Court's order. The election: (a) file the whole complaint as one sealed instrument (the monster-complaint doctrine — no reward for obstruction), with the counts severable if the Court directs; or (b) if the Court prefers, file the qui tam counts sealed and the declaratory/injunctive counts as a companion public action, with an immediate motion to consolidate (FRCP 42). Option (a) is the primary strategy; option (b) is the court-ordered fallback — never split by facts, only by legal theory, and consolidate immediately.

2. The state qui tam seal. Gov. Code § 12652 carries its own seal and disclosure requirements — cite-check and follow exactly at filing.

3. The escalation channel is preserved, not replaced. The emergency application to the assigned Circuit Justice (the Introduction § 6; the Kagan request) remains the escalation instrument if the district route is obstructed by the very disqualifications it pleads — the nemo iudex problem is the thesis of the whole set. The vehicle election in the emergency application (district-first; Sup. Ct. R. 22(2) after an adverse ruling; or the extraordinary writ) is unchanged by this filing: this complaint is the district-first route, filed in the right circuit.

4. Page limits. The architecture holds the federal complaint at 20–25 pages and the California complaint at ~15 pages, with the roadmap, incorporation by reference, and the exhibit set carrying the volume; move for leave to exceed in the same filing if the local rules require.

5. Service order (federal, unsealed counts only). Defendants are served per FRCP 4 once the seal lifts as to them; the sovereign-immunity framings are respected by the relief's design (declarations and injunctions against officers; damages against individuals for unofficial acts; statutory damages where Congress created them).

6. Consolidation and coordination. The federal and state actions are one matter at two layers; plead them as such, and where any court orders a split, move to consolidate immediately (FRCP 42; CCP § 403 for the state action) — the obstruction umbrella count is drafted for exactly this.

7. The verification ledger governs the drafts. Every citation below at the verify-before-filing tier must be cite-checked against primary sources; the verified-tier anchors are listed as verified in the Introduction's evidence ledger and carry into the exhibits.

THE VERIFICATION & TIER LEDGER (the drafts' evidence state)

• Verified in the Introduction's ledger (the dated public-record anchors): the delivery receipts (663225; 663273); the oath and confirmation dates (Trump 1/20/2017 and 1/20/2025; Blanche 8/10/2026; Hegseth 1/25/2025; Rubio 1/21/2025; Cannon 11/12–13/2020; Quiñones 8/2 and 8/13/2025); Bush v. Gore's five-vote provenance; the 6/16/2015 launch; the 7/15/2024 dismissal; the Volume II seal dates; the Polansky lineup (solo dissent; Kavanaugh–Barrett concurrence); Trump v. Vance; Norton's void-ab-initio holding; Pinkerton; Salinas; Throckmorton; Thompson, 562 U.S. 170; the four release orders (Engelmayer 12/9/2025; Preska 8/11/2026; Sullivan 6/25 and 7/2/2026; Kollar-Kotelly 9/30/2026); the EFTA text; the CBS classified-material record (10/28/2026); the Blanche denials (1/30/2026); the takeover chronology (1/1/2014; 4/2014; 2020; 7/1/2025); the Lake/Halligan/Chattah voiding rulings; the Medetis Long removal (Reuters); the Senate Finance acknowledgment (10/13/2026); the docket asymmetry (3/19/41+41); the UCSF/CHORI staff-replacement record (the recovered published record); the Falcon 30 record (N911WL); the UC Davis funding years.

• Pleaded upon information and belief (the relator's held record, document-tier distinct at filing per his own rule): the 2002–2004 whistleblowing specifics; the 2013 qui tam's contents; the 10/20/2013 cyberattack; the 9/21/2014 seizure and 13-item list; the 9/20/2014 stop and its refuted reports; the DA-office extortion; the Steinhart extortion; the entrapment windows; the oligarch-proxy approaches; the 2007 joining; the aircraft campaign's authorizations; the promotions' attribution layer.

• Citations at the verify-before-filing tier (cite-check against primary sources before any filing): the California citations (Gov. Code §§ 905, 815.2, 12650–12656; Lab. Code § 1102.5; Civ. Code §§ 52.1, 527.6; CCP §§ 395, 1085, 1060, 1102.75, 338(d), 352, 1010, 2015.5, 403); the federal procedural citations (FRCP 4(m), 10(d), 42; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, 1367, 1391, 2201–2202, 1746); Harlow, Monell, Iqbal, Holmberg, Matrixx; the Bane Act damages figure; the Norton California-application line; the local rules of both courts (W.D. Wash. LCR; Sacramento County Superior Court local rules and e-filing protocol).

• The open items before filing: the seal election (Mechanics ¶ 1); the CA claims-presentation timing (Gov. Code § 905's six-month window vs. the tolling alternatives — present on filing if not already presented); the exhibit assembly (the SHA-256 hashing pass and Master Index build); the emergency-application cross-reference update if filed first; the Nov. 2, 2026 Eleventh Circuit argument's outcome feeding the venue paragraphs; the W.D. Wash. filing channel (settled Oct. 31, 2026 — confirm before filing): pro se cases cannot be opened in CM/ECF — the pro se filer submits case-opening documents by email or mail (11:59 p.m. PT deadline) — and sealed cases cannot be opened electronically at all; the court's own pages conflict on the paper channel for sealed filings (the Civil Case Opening page: sealed cases "must be filed in paper either by mail or personal delivery to the courthouse"; the CM/ECF FAQ: sealed cases "must be filed in person … cannot be filed by mail or email," and cannot be accessed electronically once filed), so the sealed-qui-tam channel must be confirmed with the Clerk's Office (Seattle, 206-370-8440) and/or the USAO W.D. Wash. Civil Frauds unit before submission (the conduit agreement means the USAO is already engaged); the pro se registration sequence: once the case is open and the fee paid or IFP granted (28 U.S.C. § 1915), the per-case CM/ECF registration form unlocks direct e-filing of all subsequent documents from anywhere — no Washington presence required to file, serve (the government serves while sealed), or appear (remote appearances standard); the Sacramento channel (settled Oct. 31, 2026): civil e-filing runs through a certified EFSP (the court accepts no direct e-filings) and is permissive for all parties — self-represented litigants are not required to e-file though encouraged — with documents received before 11:59:59 p.m. deemed filed that day (CCP § 1010.6); out-of-state filing works through the same EFSP portal, or by mail, drop box, or counter; remote appearance by RA-010 notice; out-of-state verifications under penalty of perjury are valid (CCP § 2015.5; 28 U.S.C. § 1746 federally); the venue-transferability question is settled — W.D. Wash. stands for Document 1 (a California federal filing invites § 1406(a)/§ 1404(a) transfer motions and forfeits the delivery-territory anchor; the retaliation spoke's California venue is already served by Document 2 in Sacramento County Superior Court, and both fora sit in the Ninth Circuit so the circuit-justice thesis survives either way); the cite-check of the verify-tier citations against primary sources.

TIMELINE

 

A 25 Year Timeline of the Ongoing RICO Obstruction Conspiracy by Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation's Network Against the Editor of Uprights News with Estoppel and Tolling Attached

 

Epstein's Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UCSF Lured Editor into Illegal Medical Experiments Trafficking Kids

2001: “Kelly” Services recruited and marketed temporary medical contracts to the Editor of UPR News

2001: Only Kelly could have falsified the Editor's 2^nd “degree verification” at University of Guelph

2001: Editor performed well at Kelly's UCSF, Exelixis, and Amira Medical/Roche medical contracts

2002: Kelly/Epstein's Roche, Alameda, CA lured Editor to non-existent 6 month temp-to-hire contract

2002: Kelly/Roche concealed non-existent position at a “shadow facility” with know lethal operations

2002: Kelly/Roche's concealed lethal operating conditions killing and/or endangering children/Editor

 

Epstein's Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UCSF Shared Taxpayer Funds via GOP/Bush/Robert Mueller/CA State

2002: Kelly/Roche/CHORI/UCSF sharing taxpayer funds (Robert Mueller, Bush, GOP and CA admin)

2002: Recipients/Leaders: Roche/CHORI/Dr. H. Erlich/Dr. C. Hsieh; Roche-UCSF's Dr. S. Stroschein

 

Epstein's Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UCSF Concealed Lethal Operations Trafficking/Killing/Harming Kids

2002: Kelly/Roche/CHORI/UCSF/Mueller/Bush/GOP conspired to traffic children into lethal research

2002: Kelly, Roche, CHORI, and/or UCSF conspired to divert Editor to fetch/store CHORI kids' blood

2002: Kelly/Roche/CHORI conspired to deprive Editor of PPE to fetch/store CHORI kids' blood

2002: Editor almost killed by lethal operating conditions, which killed and/or endangered CHORI kids

2002: CHORI kids trafficked into illegal medical experiments excessively bleeding them, one to death

 

Editor established as a protected whistleblower retaliated against in a conspiracy by the State of CA

2002: Kelly/Roche internal emails specified Editor worked well and Roche wanted to keep him >6 mo.

2002: Editor blew the whistle internally at Kelly/Roche to remedy lethal conditions of Roche-CHORI

2002: Editor taught to print screen by manager Karina Orle to “protect himself” from Epstein's Roche

2002: Editor print-screened and retained records of whistleblowing to protect himself from lethal work

2002: Kelly/Roche conspired to retaliate in conspiracy against a protected whistleblower – the Editor

2002: Editor was subjected to adverse employment conduct, a German honeypot, Russian threats, fired

2002: Kelly/Roche's whistleblower retaliation conspiracy concealed illegal operations/infanticide

2002: When Editor was fired, he had already past the 6 month temp-to-hire period and was denied job

2002: Editor blew the whistle at CAL OSHA circa 10/10-11/2002, and provided evidence

2002-2003: CAL OSHA established an ongoing conspiracy to retaliated against whistleblower

2002-2003: CAL OSHA “seriously” cited Epstein's Roche Molecular Systems/Kelly for lethal ops

2002-2003: Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UCSF engaged in massive ongoing government fraud conspiracy

 

Editor sued Roche/Kelly but his defrauding attorney chain was referred to him by Roche's Wildensteins

2002-2003: Circa after CAL OSHA established qui tam conspiracy, Editor asked father for attorney

2002-2003: Father worked with Epstein's Wildenstein family in French government for attorney

2002-2003: Trump World's Wildenstein family was de facto business partners with Roche's Hoffmanns

2002-2003: EFTA's Wildenstein family concealed de facto partnership with Hoffmanns offering lawyer

2002-2003: EFTA's Wildenstein-Hoffmann families bridged by artist Elizabeth Murray (now dead)

2002-2003: EFTA's Wildenstein family referred lawyer Kenny Pedroza, who referred Mark Rudy

2002-2003: Mark Rudy defrauded Editor many different ways to protect EFTA's Roche/Hoffmanns

2003: Jeffrey Epstein transfers and/or launders about $200K into Roche's accounts via foreign banks

 

Editor trained by State of CA at University of CA in medical/clinical research management on humans

2003-2004: Editor trained in FDA regulations/ICH GCP compliance for human medical research

2003-2004: Editor discovered that Roche/CHORI/UCSF trafficking/killing kids was illegal

2003-2004: Editor brings evidence to FDA office close to Oakland/Alameda border about killed child

2003-2004: FDA's G. Brown meets with Editor at FDA office, reveals experiments were illegal

2003-2004: FDA RICO obstructs investigation into murdered and/or endangered kids despite evidence

2003-2004: Editor kidnapped by Mark Rudy, John Beers, Roche, Kelly, and/or others in San Francisco

2003-2004: Editor defrauded by Rudy during kidnapping and forced to sign “hush money” agreement

2003-2004: Agreement/terms concealed from Editor by Rudy, Beers, et al. who refuse Editor a copy

2003-2004: Epstein/Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UCSF/CA/GOP/Bush/Mueller/FDA co-mixing finances

2003-2004: Epstein/Roche/Kelly/CHORI/UC/CA/GOP/Bush/Mueller/FDA furthered government fraud

 

Editor fled SF Bay Area to mitigate Epstein's Edge participants' qui tam obstruction/RICO conspiracy

2003-2004: Editor fled Epstein's Edge participants' qui tam obstruction/RICO conspiracy to Canada

2003-2004: Editor forced to return by Mark Rudy for depositions/kidnapping/settlement with Roche

2003-2004: Epstein/Roche/Kelly/Mark Rudy/Tania Rose/John Beers furthered qui tam retaliation

2003-2004: Epstein/Roche/Kelly/Mark Rudy/Tania Rose/John Beers furthered government fraud

 

Overt furtherance of whistleblower retaliation conspiracy by Epstein's Edge Foundation “participants”

2004: Mark Rudy, UCSF, SEIU, East Bay Express, Revelation Studios, conspire to defame Editor

2004: Rudy/UC/SEIU, East Bay et al., conspire to career-ending article against Editor to protect Roche

2004: News article is printed and distributed around SF Bay Area where Editor works/lives

2004: Defamatory article says Editor is a whistleblower “guaranteed to raise hell”, implies he's a clown

2004+: Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation's Bill Gates' Microsoft agrees to spread defamation online

2004+: Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation's Brin's/Page's Google agrees to spread defamation online

2004+: Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation's Brin's/Page's Alphabet agrees to spread defamation online

2004+: Jeffrey Epstein's Edge Foundation's Mayer's/Black's Yahoo agrees to spread defamation online

2004-2026: Epstein's Edge participants conspired to further Editor/whistleblower retaliation conspiracy

2004-2026: Epstein's Edge participants conspired to further ongoing government fraud conspiracy

2004-2026: Epstein's Edge participants included both Maya Hoffmanns and their Roche (Russia-link)

2004-2026: Epstein's Edge participants and/or Epstein financed Foundation Medicine/Valar (P. Thiel)

2004-2026: Epstein's Edge participants included Y. Milner/E. Musk/M. Zuckerberg (Facebook/Twitter)

 

Editor fled SF Bay Area again to mitigate Epstein's Edge participants' whistleblower/RICO conspiracy

2004: Editor fled SF Bay Area to Sacramento, CA, to mitigate ongoing defamation/blacklisting

2004: Editor unknowingly hired by a Roche vendor sharing government funds with them, Jackson Lab

2004: Jackson Laboratory repeatedly failed to train Editor, and subjected him/1600 employees to harm

2004: About half of Jackson Lab (West) senior staff were unlawfully terminated and/or suddenly quit

2004: Editor promoted into Senior Project Coordinator position and rescued Jax West/global operations

2004: Editor interviewed Jax West staff during implosion of operations, developed SOP manual

2004: Elizabeth Bunker transferred from Bar Harbor to replace fired West Coast Jackson Lab director

2004: Editor internally whistleblew Jax West's unsafe, unhealthy, and unlawful practices to Bunker

2004: Epstein's Edge Foundation spread East Bay Express/Rudy/SEIU/UCSF defamation online

2004: Bunker seized Editor's Jax West operations manual rescuing Jax West implosion then fired him

2004: Editor subjected to adverse employment misconduct and wrongful termination by Jackson Lab

2004: Editor whistleblew to State of CA and to nearly all federal agencies financing Jackson Lab

2004-2005: State of CA and federal agencies financing Epstein's Roche's Jackson Lab RICO-obstruct

2004-2005: Jackson Lab, State of CA, and federal employees furthered ongoing qui tam retaliation

2004-2005: Jackson Lab, State of CA, and federal employees furthered ongoing gov't fraud conspiracy

 

Editor selected by/wins UCSCE internship competition at Epstein's/Roche's/Thiel's Stanford University

2004: Editor invited by UC Santa Cruz (Extension) to compete for Stanford University internship

2004: Editor writes a cutting edge Stanford clinical research protocol for pharmaco-genomics-kinetics

2004: Editor wins internship competition at Stanford University who shared funds with Roche+Epstein

2004-2005: Editor completes FDA certification for human medical research at Stanford, offered job

2005: Stanford job required Editor to drive 3-5 hours one way to work after marriage and 1^st child

2005: Stanford job required Editor to work/stay away from home, wife, and child -- harming family

2005: Editor asked to “target Christians/veterans/GOP” with lethal small pox vaccine study recruiting

2005: Editor refused to “target Christians/veterans/GOP” and expanded target to Stanford community

2005: Stanford University threatened Editor's job for expanding random trial recruitment to Stanford

2005: Editor bullied out of Stanford by Stanford new hire Justine Barnard assigned to Editor

2005: Editor complained to Editor that he was forced to leave due to ongoing retaliation by Bernard

2005: Barnard was married to a John Bernard. A John Barnard worked for Epstein's Roche.

2005: Stanford University overtly furthered Epstein's Roche's et al.'s whistleblower harms conspiracy

2005: Stanford University overtly furthered Epstein's Roche's et al.'s government fraud conspiracy

 

Editor forced to take a poorly-paid position at Jeffrey Epstein's and KKR's UC Davis Medical Center

2005: Editor solicited to and forced by way of blacklisting to apply for poorly-paid role at UC Davis

2005: Editor hired at UC Davis medical center in Sacramento to help with their non-compliance

2005: Editor tasked to both facilitate their medical research and to shore up SOPs for compliance

2005: Editor diverted away from SOP compliance when he starts to find major issues

2005: Editor overloaded with more clinical trials that was safe for patients and whistleblew the same

2005: Editor overloaded with more clinical trials after, whistleblew the same patient safety risks

2005: Editor extorted, blackmailed, and/or coerced into falsifying medical research records but refused

2005: Editor then defamed same day accused of changing extorting doctor's medical record, but didn't

2005: Editor wrongfully-terminated for whistleblowing and refusing to falsify reportable adverse event

2005: Editor's manager, Monica Steinhart, same day physically attacked Editor at his desk for evidence

2005: Steinhart attacked Editor from sitting position for his personal weekly organizer to hide evidence

2005: Steinhart destroyed Editor's personal property in attack upon him to steal evidence of UCD harm

2005: To mitigate, Editor attempted to leave office with half of his personal organizer he bought

2005: Steinhart demanded the other half of organizer or she threatened she'd tell police he attacked her

2005: Steinhart demanded the other half of personal property or she would withhold last check/traffic

2005: Editor immediately contacted Sacramento Police to report Steinhart's UCD's numerous crimes

Nexus: Editor once volunteered/deputized to work with Sacramento Police in Natomas Sacramento

2005: Sacramento Police RICO obstructed and deprived rights under color of law, refusing to help

2005: Editor asked his MBA law professor at University of Phoenix for help with crimes against him

2005: Abandoned, Editor extorted to hand over his destroyed personal property to Steinhart/UC Davis

 

Editor contacted GOP Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's office to whistleblow crimes by conspirators

2005: Editor contacted the office of GOP's Arnold Schwarzenegger for help, but RICO-obstructed

2005-2008: GOP's Schwarzenegger and GW Bush are close allies, and Bush/Mueller financed Roche

2005-2008: Jeffrey Epstein accused of child sex trafficking in Florida with (up to 1,971) conspirators

2005-2008: Jeffrey Epstein's black book of clients, victims, vendors, and associates leaked by butler

2005-2008: Largest 3 families in black book are UK/EU 'royals', Trump family, Schwarzenegger family

2005-2006: Editor wrote a book he never published “How to Kill a Baby and Get Away with It”

2005-2006: Book How to Kill a Baby and Get Away with It written on Epstein's Bill Gates' MS Word

2005-2006: Book How to Kill a Baby and Get Away with It detailed RICO obstruction of Roche death

2005-2006: Editor significantly defamed and blacklisted from all gainful employment, pursues MBA

2005-2007: Editor completed two year MBA at University of Phoenix due to ongoing blacklisting

 

Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump joined the ongoing whistleblower retaliation conspiracy against Editor

2007: Blacklisting and qui tam retaliation furthered by Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump at KCRA

2007: KCRA is owned by Jeffrey Epstein's Hearst family linked to Epstein's Bill Gates' Microsoft news

2007: Editor applied to work for Donald Trump's operations, and was personally blacklisted by Trump

2007+: Nexus: Epstein's and Trump's Wildenstein family lived on Trump World property at UN Plaza

2002-2007: Nexus: Wildenstein family were de facto business partners with Roche's Maya Hoffmann

2002-2026: Nexus: Maya Hoffmann (two of them) and Roche were both linked to Epstein's Edge group

2002-2026: Nexus: Epstein's UK 'royals' were friends with Epstein's Trump and Wildenstein family

2002-2026: Nexus: Epstein's UK 'royals' were “godfather” to Wildenstein family and/or vice versa

2002-2026: Nexus: Trump and GOP super-funded Epstein's Edge participants with gov't contracts

2004-2026: Nexus: GOP/Wildenstein obstructed for Epstein's Edge's billionaires financing Trump/GOP

2007-2026: Nexus: Trump, Wildenstein, Hoffman, and Roche found in DOJ's Epstein files (EFTA)

2002-2026: Nexus: Trump, GOP, and Epstein's Edge participants' companies furthered qui tam harms

2002-2026: Nexus: Trump, GOP, and Epstein's Edge participants' companies furthered gov't fraud

 

Editor went to work as a bank agent and financial services specialist for Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB

2006-2010: Editor became a bank agent and financial specialist at Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HSB

2006-2010: Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB repeatedly subjects Editor to adverse employment harm

2006-2010: Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB demoted and dropped Editor's pay after forcing him to quit

2006-2010: Editor returned and was recognized as one of the best and asked to train managers/others

2006-2010: Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB refused to hire Editor as manager, hired a child with no MBA

2006-2010: HSBC/HRB regional office demoted Editor to support their child manager in various roles

2006-2010: Child of HSBC/HRB regional office failed to perform, but Editor met sales goals by 275%

2006-2010: Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB overtly furthered the ongoing qui tam retaliation conspiracy

2006-2010: Epstein's Safra's HSBC/HRB overtly furthered the ongoing government fraud conspiracy

 

Editor went to work as a graduate professor for (Epstein's Leon Black's) Apollo's University of Phoenix

2010-2016: To mitigate the harm HSBC/HRB could do to the Editor, he fled to University of Phoenix

2010-2016: While at University of Phoenix he was singled out 3 times as one of the best professors

2010-2016: Students, operations management, and an internal UOP publication praised his teaching

2010-2016: The Editor was separately hired to lead 20 other faculty members to develop 40 products

2010-2016: The Editor was separately hired as an Organizational Learning and Development Specialist

2010-2016: The Editor separately created a “skunk works” program at UOP to stimulate innovation

2010-2016: The Editor wrote and was granted a number of disruptive recycling manufacturing patents

2010-2016: The Editor started a number of different research projects linked to Epstein's crime family

2010-2016: Editor had developed a number of websites for his research and innovations on Google

2012: Editor published Library of Congress research debunking Epstein's UK royals' royal claims

2012: Editor enrolled and started a 4 year JD law school program to become a Doctor of Law/lawyer

2012: Epstein's and Leon Black's Edge Foundation billionaires met to discuss shared concerns (EFTA)

2013: Editor started academic research into the harm activities of Epstein's Edge participants

2013: Editor learned about GOP's Lincoln Law/whistleblower law and merged research projects

2013-2014: Editor started to write one of the largest whistleblower complaints in US history, $40B

 

Epstein's Russia attacks Editor's qui tam as one of Russia's first civilian cyber”warfare” targets

10/20/2013: Russian Federation cyberattacked Editor's qui tam investigation computer

10/20/2013: Editor became one of the first civilians to be cyberattacked by Russia

10/20/2013: Editor as a relator represented US government, and so attack on Editor was attack on USA

10/20/2013: Russia had only engaged in cyber (enemy) “warfare” against US agencies prior that

10/20/2013: Epstein's Putin's and Edge's Yuri Milner may have been involved or not

2013-2016: Editor qui tam used UOP's computers/Epstein's (Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo) platforms

Nexus: Palantir's SacPolice trained at the same UOP campus as Editor, implicating SacPolice

2013-2016: Nexus: Epstein's Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, GOP were named in this whistleblower lawsuit

2013-2016: Nexus: Editor was accusing Epstein's Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo using their technology

2013-2016: Nexus: Editor used Bill Barr's Verizon phone to digitize evidence against Edge Foundation

2013-2016: Nexus: Epstein's Putin “engineered” Epstein's Trump into POTUS, Epstein's Barr made AG

Nexus: Epstein's/Trump's Bill Barr/HR McMaster/Harlan Crow/Bush family stalked Editor's brother

Nexus: Bill Barr was the son of Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile mentor at Dalton, Donald Barr

Nexus: Barr's father wrote pedophile fantasy novel Space Relations for space billionaires

Nexus: All of the billionaires in space link to Jeffrey Epstein/Donald Barr/Space Relations

Nexus: All billionaires in space are all linked to Jeffrey Epstein-Edge Foundation-NXIVM

Nexus: Spacex=SpaceSex=SpaSex (Musk), 'Virgin' Galactic (Branson), Blue Origin (Bezos)

 

The Rio Vista Special: Daniel Dailey, Scott Jones, the GOP, Qanon, and the Russians

2013-2014: Editor approached State of CA's Daniel Dailey and GOP's Morrison England for help

2013-2014: Daniel Dailey, a proxy of CA/Sacramento GOP sent Russians to Editor's home to “clean”

2013-2014: GOP's Scott Jones' Dailey's Russian cleaners broke into Editor's office space stole qui tam

Nexus: Editor anonymously described help needed for qui tam to GOP Judge England/Dan Dailey

Nexus: Editor anonymously signed off qui tam hypothetical to judge as brother [“Q” anon]ymous

Nexus: Qanon cult came much later, recycled Editor's kids trafficking murder story into Pizzagate

Nexus: Editor can prove that he is the original “Q”, where GOP's Qanon later stole Editor's life story

Nexus: Qanon cult born out of AZ GOP and/or pedophile chat groups 4chan, 8chan and/or 8kun

Nexus: Qanon cult later warped Editor's story from GOP pedophiles into Democrat pedophiles

Nexus: Dan Dailey gave a GOP-linked DOJ contact, Democrats provided Dem-linked DOJ contact

Nexus: Editor spoke to DOJ and let them know he was going to exercise his qui tam rights first

Nexus: DOJ, CA OES, and Sacramento Sheriff/Police using Epstein's Thiel's Palantir and Stingray

Nexus: Twitter/X's and Epstein's Musk's partner Peter Thiel (GOP's Palantir) was Epstein's partner

Nexus: Jeffrey Epstein financed/laundered into Peter Thiel's Valar company, and Musk's Spacex

Nexus: Epstein's Musk and Epstein's Thiel were business partners and part of Epstein's Edge group

 

Editor entrapped by CA/Sacramento GOP's Scott Jones and SacPD a week after implicating them both

09/20/2014: Editor entrapped by USAF's Will Skeeters, GOP lobbyist, Sacramento Sheriff, U2 pilot

09/20/2014: Skeeters friend/neighbor SacDeputy Steve Carrozzo worked/friends with Daniel Dailey

09/20/2014: Skeeters and Dailey each from Texas and each former USAF

09/20/2014: Editor asked by Skeeters to stay in guest room to celebrate Skeeter's 40^th b-day “to drink”

09/20/2014: Editor called wife, who approved, and then drank with Skeeters/SacDeputy throughout day

09/20/2014: At the end of Skeeters' party, Skeeters denied Editor guest room offered; Editor gets a DUI

09/20/2014: DUI arresting agency was SacPolice who Editor had implicated in qui tam a week earlier

Nexus: SacPolice overtly furthered Epstein-linked RICO obstruction at UC Davis in 2005

Nexus: SacPolice had access to Palantir, Stingray, mobile stalking data, and deleted MVARS video

Nexus: SacPolice had trained on same UOP computers/network as Editor used to implicate them

Nexus: SacPolice/GOP (SacSheriff) each had a motive to entrap, unlawfully-stop, Editor

09/20/2014: SacPolice's MVARS video caught officers conspiring to harm Editor before roadside test

Nexus: Female SacPolice said they would beat Editor “black” and put a “knock/glock to his head”

Nexus: SacPolice later debated Editor's murder on body cams in back of cruiser as “has happened”

Nexus: Female SacPolice later tortured Editor from behind while he was bound from behind

Nexus: SacPolice repeatedly “expressed an intent to harm” Editor on their cameras before harming

Nexus: SacPolice had been implicated in the Editor's qui tam at least a week earlier with GOP

09/20/2014: SacPolice skewed roadside test and asked Editor where he was from, “Canada” is heard

Nexus: Deprivation of rights under color of law based on male gender and country of origin

09/21/2014: SacPolice's Officers Rambo and Hawley debated executing Editor in GOP-held facility

09/21/2014: SacPolice aborted execution plans after realizing body cams were still on

09/21/2014: SacPolice female officers unzipped the pants of Editor to expose his penis

09/21/2014: SacPolice officers seized the qui tam investigation of the Editor implicating SacPolice

Nexus: SacPolice/GOP Sacramento Sheriff had about 10 hours of access to Editor's flash drive

Nexus: Laws passed in advance to let SacPolice/GOP Sacramento Sheriff to unlawfully-search

Nexus: Editor's USB flash drive/qui tam investigation implicated SacPD and GOP

Nexus: SacPD used patterned perjury to indict Editor, proven by their own video-to-statements

09/21/2014: SacPolice officer then tortured Editor from behind while he was bound from behind

Nexus: Editor now has 5 deteriorating spinal conditions, some of which have a surgical referral

Nexus: Torture event was under camera and in front of many witnesses; Brady that was denied

Nexus: Editor emailed both GOP SacSheriff/DA, subpoenaed SacSheriff, and motioned for Brady

Nexus: Torture Brady video/witnesses denied by GOP SacSheriff/DA sharing consultant Gilliard

Nexus: Editor shopped to all GOP cast of prosecutors, sheriff, and judges, including Gilliard's wife

Nexus: GOP cast of prosecutors, sheriff, and judges, including Gilliard's wife, denied Brady access

Nexus: Aileen Cannon selected by Trump/Rubio to seal Editor's Brady evidence forever in Smith

Nexus: Editor fled Northern CA law enforcement jurisdiction brought investigation to Western WA

Nexus: DOJ (Trump) accepted Editor's Epstein-Russia-GOP-Trump-UK royals qui tam 08/29/24

Nexus: DOS (Rubio) accepted Editor's Epstein-Russia-GOP-Trump-UK royals qui tam 08/29/24

Nexus: DOJ and DOS received Editor's million pages or so of Epstein evidence by August 2024

Nexus: Editor's million pages or so of Epstein evidence is missing from DOJ Epstein files 2026

Nexus: Aileen Cannon selected by Trump/Rubio to seal Editor's Brady evidence forever in Smith

Nexus: Editor asked DOS(Rubio)/DOJ(Trump) under camera to pass qui tam onto Jack Smith

Nexus: Editor fled to Canada to wait for DOS/DOJ to act but Trump/Rubio/Cannon obstructed

Nexus: 2023-2026 Editor started UPR News and elucidated Epstein was the Russia-Trump hub

Nexus: Editor was the first to publish the Epstein-Russia-GOP bridge before Epstein files released

09/21/2014 – SacPolice engaged in patterned perjury (per MVARS) in order for GOP's DA to indict

Nexus: Editor shopped EXCLUSIVELY to GOP judges and GOP prosecutors violating due process

Nexus: GOP's Sacramento Sheriff/DA denying Brady had the same GOP consultant Dave Gilliard

Nexus: Editor shopped to Dave Gilliard's wife Judge M. Gilliard for appeals, ignored coram nobis

Nexus: Russian Lev Parnas' lawyers threatened Trump administration with 09/21 date in a video

Nexus: Russian Lev Parnas' lawyers threatened Trump administration with September song lyrics

Nexus: Earth, Wind, and Fire September lyrics: “Do you remember the 21st night of September?

Nexus: Earth, Wind, and Fire September lyrics: “Remember how the stars stole the night away”

Nexus: Editor's qui tam civil complaint was stolen by Trump orbit/stars “21^st night of September”

Nexus: Russian Lev Parnas' lawyers threatened Trump administration with 09/21 date in a video

Nexus: Per 11/03/2015 Sater/Emails Russians-Trump-GOP conspired “engineer” GOP into office

Nexus: Russian Lev Parnas was arrested after the 2016 elections and knew of Editor's entrapment

Nexus: Trump-Epstein met in 2015; 03/30/2023 Trump said he knew of a witch-hunt 06/16/2015

Nexus: Epstein's Edge's Microsoft, Verizon, Google, Yahoo, Palantir, or GOP knew 09/21/2014

Nexus: Epstein met with Trump in 2015, 3-6 months after Epstein's network/partners/Edge knew

Nexus: BEFORE Trump ran for office on 06/16/2015 Trump said 03/30/23 he knew of witch-hunt

Nexus: Crossfire Hurricane investigating Trump-Russia-GOP started a year after Trump knew

Nexus: The only investigation/witch-hunt Trump could have known about was the Editor's

Nexus: Trump later cryptically told the public he “learned everything from Fred”, Editor's name

Nexus: Trump ran for office on Editor's daughter's b-day

Nexus: Trump conspired with Russia on Editors b-day at Mayflower (Editor's family) Hotel

Nexus: Editor fled to Whistler Canada by WA DOJ/DOS, then Trump threatened to annex Canada

Nexus: When Editor came home before Trump 2.0, he returned to Anthony Vo in Whistler

Nexus: Editor had implicated Vo and Trump in crimes against USA, Vo then beelined to Whistler

Nexus: Despite being on the run, illegally-entering Canada, Vo gave many interviews in Whistler

Nexus: Vo stalked Editor to Canada to threaten Editor from returning “leaving no safe place to go”

Nexus: Trump then hit Canada with crushing 30-50% tariffs and had Google rename Lake Ontario

Nexus: Editor was from Lake Ontario region, Trump also closed bridge to Canada

Nexus: GOP/SacPD implicated in qui tam with Trump orbit 2014; asked if Editor from Canada

Nexus: Trump attacked Canada over and over after a Canadian gave DOJ legal path to remove him

Nexus: That Canadian was the Editor, but his family founded America (Mayflower; John Adams)

09/21/2014+: SacPolice MVARS video prove Editor drove with care and control, no reason to stop

09/21/2014+: Sacramento tainted their own MVARS video evidence deleting some audio/video tracks

09/21/2014+: Sacramento Police MVARS deleted the minutes before they illegally-pulled over Editor

09/21/2014+: SacPolice, GOP's SacSheriff, GOP's SacDA, GOP judges denied Editor torture Brady

09/21/2014+: Editor filed his own motion for Brady and it was denied because of Steve Whitworth

09/21/2014+: Whitworth falsified he was Editor's attorney for GOP judge to deny Editor's Brady

09/21/2014+: Editor had not signed retainer nor paid Whitworth retainer fee prior to interference

09/21/2014+: Steve Whitworth's private investigator was Daniel Dailey's friend

Nexus: Daniel Dailey had worked and was friends with Sacramento Sheriff/Police/DA/USAF/DOJ

Nexus: Daniel Dailey had worked with UC Davis Children's Hospital linked to CHORI (UCSF)

Nexus: 2015-2017 Daniel Dailey worked with Palantir/DOJ/CA OES network

Nexus: 2016-2026 Palantir/CA OES network agencies stalked/threatened Editor with death often

Nexus: 2016-2026 Trump's/Biden's federal agencies joined CA OES in stalking and death threats

Nexus: Weeks and months prior to entrapment, Epstein met with Leon Black, Bill Gates, Bill Burns

Nexus: Weeks and months prior to entrapment, Epstein met with Ruemmler, and Palantir's Thiel

Nexus: Weeks and moths prior to entrapment, Epstein met with Edge Foundation billionaires

Nexus: Epstein's and Leon's Black Edge Foundation billionaires is who Editor was suing in qui tam

Nexus: Editor researched how to sue Epstein's and Black's Edge billionaires from UOP computers

2013-2016: Editor used UOP's computers and Epstein's (Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo) platforms

2013-2016: Nexus: Epstein's Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, GOP were named in this whistleblower lawsuit

2013-2016: Nexus: Editor was accusing Epstein's Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo using their technology

2013-2016: Nexus: Editor used Bill Barr's Verizon phone to digitize evidence against Edge Foundation

2013-2016: Nexus: Epstein's Putin “engineered” Epstein's Trump into POTUS, Epstein's Barr made AG

Nexus: Epstein's/Trump's Bill Barr/HR McMaster/Harlan Crow/Bush family stalked Editor's brother

Nexus: Bill Barr was the son of Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile mentor at Dalton, Donald Barr

Nexus: Barr's father wrote pedophile fantasy novel Space Relations for space billionaires

Nexus: All of the billionaires in space link to Jeffrey Epstein/Donald Barr/Space Relations/NXIVM

Nexus: Spacex=SpaceSex=SpaSex (Musk), 'Virgin' Galactic (Branson), Blue Origin (Bezos)

Nexus: Epstein laundered/invested/mixed child sex trafficking money into Elon Musk's Spacex

2014: Editor unlawfully-terminated (per State of CA) at UOP, later bought by Epstein's Leon Black

Nexus: Epstein's Black's Apollo bought UOP with GOP's Bush's Carlyle/UC's State St. financing

2014: Editor begins filing patent family for game-changing patent family for recycling manufacturing

Nexus: By 2024 Trump/Edge Foundation's Microsoft/Amazon/GoDaddy attack patent development

 

On 06/16/2015 Trump knew of an investigation into him BEFORE he ran for office (Editor's qui tam)

Spring 2015: Trump-Epstein met after Editor's seized qui tam vs. Trump-Epstein-Edge-Russian orbit

Nexus: Lozzo of Payload Security became FBI informant 2017, reported Trump-Epstein met 2015

06/16/2015: Trump ran for GOP on Editor's daughter birthday knowing about Editor's qui tam

Nexus: On 03/30/2023, Trump said he knew of a witch-hunt (qui tam) into him/Russia on 06/16/15

Nexus: Except 06/16/15 was a year before Crossfire Hurricane, RICO obstructed by Mueller/Barr

Nexus: Mueller's, Bush's, GOP's DOJ is who financed Epstein's Roche-CHORI-USCF child death

Nexus: Barr's Verizon was Editor's cellular provider used to digitize evidence 2013-2016

Nexus: Bill Barr, GW Bush, Jeb Bush, HR McMaster, Harland Crow stalked/met Editor's brother

Nexus: Editor had implicated GW Bush, Jeb Bush, and GOP in Editor's 2013-2014 qui tam

Nexus: Editor had implicated Guy Wildenstein who in part financed GW into Texas politics

Nexus: Epstein's Wildenstein family had UK royals as godparents, Wildenstein's lived at Trump site

Nexus: Epstein's Barr was Epstein's Trump's AG and RICO-obstructed Editor's Epstein qui tam

Nexus: Epstein's Barr RICO-obstructed Robert Mueller's investigations into Trump-Russia

Nexus: Editor's qui tam born out of Roche-CHORI child trafficking financed by Robert Mueller

Nexus: Editor's qui tam into Trump/Epstein/Edge/Russia/GOP orbit was Trump's 2015 'witch-hunt'

Nexus: Robert Mueller hand-picked to investigate the conspiracy his office first financed at Roche

Nexus: Robert Mueller was part of the law firm for Trump-Kushner and Novartis-Roche families

Nexus: Robert Mueller was a member of Trump's Doral Golf Club

Nexus: Epstein's Trump-Kushner's/Roche-Novartis Robert Mueller and Epstein's Barr obstructed

11/03/2015: Epstein's Putin's Felix Sater and Epstein's Trump's Michael Cohen conspired by email

Nexus: 2017 Epstein's Roche-Novartis/AT&T paid M. Cohen's Essential Consulting $1M “hush”

 

Trump's Michael Cohen and Putin's Felix Sater conspired to “engineer” Trump/GOP to capture DOJ

11/03/2015: Epstein's Sater/Cohen conspired to have Putin “engineer” Trump/GOP to seize DOJ

12/10/2015: Epstein's Trump's and Qanon's Mike Flynn met directly with Epstein's Putin at RT dinner

February 2016: Epstein's Leon Black's Apollo buys University of Phoenix (where Editor hired back)

Nexus: Editor heavily cyberattacked at UOP and driven out of UOP for the second time

April 2016: Russia's Alfa Bank's George Fomitchev sought to finance Editor via Russian oligarchs

April 2016: Fomitchev wanted Editor to meet the Russians on Useppa Island in Florida, Editor didn't

April 27, 2016: Trump, GOP, Jeff Session, and Russian Federation met at Mayflower Hotel

Nexus: Editor's birthday was April 27, 2016 and he was related to 2 families off Mayflower voyage

Nexus: Treason and elections fraud conspiracy planning by Trump/GOP/Russia included Rosneft

Nexus: Trump, GOP, Kislyak discussed selling 19.5% of Russia's Rosneft at Mayflower

Nexus: Trump Jr., Manafort, GOP, Kushner, and Russian sanctions lawyer met at Trump Tower

Nexus: Trump Jr., Manafort, GOP, Kushner, RU lawyer wanted to traffic kids from RU to Trumps

Nexus: ICC issued arrest warrant for Epstein's Putin for trafficking kids from Ukraine to Russia

Nexus: Trump Jr., Manafort, GOP, Kushner, and Russian lawyer discussed Rosneft sanctions

Nexus: Russians came to Epstein to drop sanctions, and Epstein met with Trump before POTUS run

Nexus: Epstein's Ruemmler/Bill Burns/H.Clinton/Kissinger/J.Kerry able to influence sanctions

Summer 2016: Alfa Bank, Spectrum Health, and Trump Tower servers connected for back channel

Nexus: Betsy DeVos' family is who owned Spectrum Health and owned Devos Children's Hospital

Nexus: Editor had worked for DeVos family at Amway, who had an Alfa Bank banking card

Nexus: DeVos and Henry Kissinger part of Theranos fraud situation

Nexus: Kissinger met Epstein a year apart the same months Theranos tried to recruit Editor's wife

Nexus: Epstein'sTheranos/Roche/Kaiser/Bohemians/Edge/French Presidents stalked Editor's family

Nexus: GOP's Bohemian Club, GW Bush, Jeb Bush, Harlan Crow, Bill Barr stalked brother;

Nexus: Numerous French, Canadian, and royal leaders stalked Editor's father, including Charles III

Nexus: More than one Russian/Arabic/Thai oligarch proxy attempted to “finance” Editor; none did

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP into office

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Epstein's Steve Bannon

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with S. Bannon's Cambridge Analytica

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Steve Bannon as campaign leader

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with UK royals' Ivar Mountbatten's SCL

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with SCL's Cambridge Analytica

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Epstein's Edge billionaires

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Epstein's Zuckerberg's Facebook

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Epstein's Y.Milner's/RU's Facebook

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Epstein's (Musk's) Twitter(X)

2015-2016: Epstein's Russia engineered Epstein's Trump/GOP with Yuri Milner's/RU's Twitter(X)

2016-2026: Editor becomes the stalking, cyberstalking, and/or death threats target of CA OES agencies

Nexus: Editor stalked and threatened with death for a decade by SacPD/Sheriff, Placer Sheriff/CHP

Nexus: Editor stalked and threatened with death for a decade by SacFire/Cal-Fire/USDA/USFS

Nexus: Editor stalked and threatened with death by network of these agencies at McClellan Park

Nexus: Trump visited McClellan Park with Gavin Newsom to give medals to those harming Editor

Nexus: Trump Jr. and Gavin Newsom were engaged to the same woman Newsom married

Nexus: Trump and Newsom financed by Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate into office and obstructed

2016-2017: Editor caught up on thousands of pages of evidence, rediscovered Trump harmed him 2007

Nexus: In 2007, Epstein's Trump personally retaliated against Editor at KCRA blacklisting him

Nexus: By 2007, Editor had repeatedly whistleblown against Epstein's network (Roche, UC, et al.)

Nexus: By 2007, Epstein's network had significantly destroyed the career of the Editor

Nexus: Epstein and Trump were “best friends” and Epstein had mixed funds with Roche

Nexus: Editor had sued Roche but was defrauded by lawyer referrals by Trump World's Wildenstein

Nexus: EFTA's Wildenstein family referred Editor lawyer chain to sue Roche (but hid relationship)

Nexus: Editor sued Epstein's Roche with Epstein's Wildenstein's lawyers as Epstein financed Roche

2016-2017: Rosneft sanctions dropped as Epstein had been asked to do by the Russians

 

The RICO-obstruction of stolen elections by Russian agents and enemies of the United States

2017: Trump revived COVID bioweapons program that enslaved and killed over 1 million Americans

Nexus: COVID bioweapon most resembled the lifetime work of UNC Chapel Hill's Ralph Baric

Nexus: Employed to distract from treason and elections fraud-got election by de facto officers

Nexus: Special Counsel Durham affirmed to Congress 06/21/2023 GOP cheated with enemy

Nexus: Trump then brought COVID to Wuhan, China paid for by taxpayers

Nexus: Wuhan military games resulted in Russia's Mike Flynn's driver returning with COVID

Nexus: First reported cases of COVID in CA/USA were streets away from Editor's home, Rocklin

Nexus: First medical teams to respond to Rocklin COVID in CA/USA was Editor's wife, Kaiser

Nexus: Trial run of COVID likely: Near identical symptoms summer before:“vaping syndrome”

Nexus: Juul vaping system linked to “vaping syndrome”, Editor's preferred vaping brand

Nexus: Trump and Edge Foundation billionaires mismanaged COVID; invested in a failed response

Nexus: $16 trillions spent for Epstein's billionaires to manage the problem they leaked onto world

2017-2018: Crossfire Hurricane usurped by Roche-Novartis' and Trump-Kushner's Robert Muller/Barr

Nexus: Robert Mueller financed Epstein's Roche-CHORI child trafficking/murder/endangerment

Nexus: Epstein's Roche-CHORI child trafficking/murder/endangerment is what resulted in qui tam

Nexus: Epstein's Roche-CHORI Qui tam retaliation conspiracy is what Trump/GOP/Edge furthered

Nexus: Editor figured the same out in law school as a university professor and wrote qui tam

Nexus: Epstein's business partners/allies at Epstein's Edge had advanced notice per Ed Snowden

Nexus: Epstein's RICO bribery of every level of government resulted in Editor's RICO entrapment

Nexus: RICO entrapment revealed Editor had stumbled onto Epstein's/Mueller's RICO conspiracy

Nexus: Mueller, Bush, GOP admin protected Epstein's circa 1,971 conspirators (Trump/Edge) '4-'8

Nexus: Mueller, Trump, Barr, GOP admin protected Epstein's up to 1,971+ conspirators 2017-2018

Nexus: Mueller, Trump, Barr, GOP administration RICO obstructed their RICO obstruction '04-'26

Nexus: Robert Mueller was part of law firm(s) for Trump-Kushner and Roche-Novartis families

Nexus: Robert Mueller member at Trump Doral Golf Club

2019: Jeffrey Epstein murdered followed by release of COVID to distract from 1985-2019 crimes

2019-2020: John Durham and Barr conspire to investigate “Origins of Crossfire Hurricane (OoCH)”

Nexus: Months before Barr “secretly” made Durham SC, Editor named his investigation OoCH

Nexus: Epstein's Trump/Barr repeatedly intimidated Editor cryptically to RICO-obstruct

Nexus: Barr literally met in person with Editor's brother; named an investigation after Editor's

Nexus: Trump regularly (DARVO) threatened Editor, and threatened his home country of Canada

Nexus: 06/21/23 Durham admitted Trump/GOP cheated in US elections with enemies: Disqualified

2020-2021: Trump/Meadows stole Crossfire Hurricane binder and more (Editor's qui tam): Disqualified

2020-2021: Trump plotted and led an insurrection against the United States: Disqualified (CO; Smith)

Nexus: Special Counsel Smith x 5 prosecutors swore evidence beyond a doubt (Trump disqualified)

 

An estimated million missing pages of DOJ Epstein evidence are the Editor's RICO obstructed qui tam

2021-2024: Trump and conspirators disqualified from office prosecuted and then abandoned (RICO)

2024: Editor brought his 22 year investigation into Epstein's RICO crime syndicate to DOJ/DOS

Nexus: Editor brought about 10,000 pages of IRAC legal analysis, circa a million pages of evidence

Nexus: DOJ (Trump) and DOS (Rubio) RICO obstructed release of millions of Epstein files

Nexus: Editor can account for an estimated third of the missing million pages of Epstein files

Nexus: Editor asked for his investigation materials to go to Trump's “revenge target” prosecutors

 

Additional entrapment schemes by Jeffrey Epstein's UK royals and GOP born of out State of FL/NY

2025: Epstein's crime syndicate lured Editor to Tofino, BC to further destroy his life

Nexus: Charles III had visited the Tofino tribe prior to the Editor being lured

Nexus: Charles III had sought to influence Editor's father as did French/Canadian Presidents/PMs

Nexus: Editor is distantly related to Charles III and in 2012 debunked Charles III's royal claims

Nexus: Charles III is mentioned in Epstein files as sharing a victim with 'prince' Andrew

Nexus: Charles III and 'prince' Andrew received questionable financing by Epstein et al. for 15 yrs

Nexus: Epstein laundered or moved money through UK royals; Edge Foundation billionaires; art

Nexus: The largest named family in the Epstein black book is the UK/EU 'royals'

Nexus: The second largest named family in the Epstein black book is the Trump family

Nexus: After Editor agreed to interview at Tofino tribe franchise, XTM/EAM Florida sold

Nexus: Tofino tribe franchise subjected Editor to squalor and abuses and falsified financial records

Nexus: Editor discovered the same and sought reconciliation of falsified records to no avail

Nexus: Tribe partner, XTM, EAM, Anyday, Everyday, CIBC, furthered Trump/royals plot

Nexus: Cross-border entrapment plot revealed to FINCEN, IRS, FTB, and to Canada

Nexus: Charles III linked to Gary Hoffman medal, linked to Barclays, and to tax entrapment

Nexus: Editor saw entrapment forming and paid Taxes for Expats to remedy situation

Nexus: Taxes for Expats dragged out 15 day turnaround for half a year then abandoned before due

Nexus: Taxes for Expats (TFX) CEO linked to Epstein's Fortress company and to Glenn Dubin

Nexus: Cross-border tax entrapment by Epstein's Trump, Charles III, Dubin, TFX, XTM/EAM, etc

Nexus: Trump's (DOJ) and Rubio's (DOS) Aileen Cannon DARVO “grand conspiracy” in Florida

Nexus: “grand conspiracy” and related revenge prosecutions debunked by diGenova et al.

Nexus: diGenova (Trump ally) specified prosecutions had “no evidence” and “unethical”

Nexus: Tucker Carlson specified Trump ordered Epstein files be concealed, linked to Russiagate

Nexus: Epstein's crime syndicate is hiding evidence they are not properly appointed/elected

Nexus: Epstein's crime syndicate is prosecuting anyone who knows the truth, but “quo warranto”?

Nexus: Aileen Cannon and Harlan Crow's Clarence Thomas RICO-obstructing Epstein=Smith files

 

Ongoing stalking, threats, defamation, deprivation under color linked to Trump-Epstein-Russia 2016

2026: Editor continues to be stalked and threatened with death by Epstein's KKR companies

2026: KKR owned by Epstein's Leon Black's and Epstein's Henry Kravis

2026: Kravis' KKR mixed finances with CHORI, UC Davis, Stanford, and Kaiser Permanente

2026: Kaiser Permanente has been falsifying the medical records of the Editor to preemptively defame

2026: Editor proved the same to DOJ/DOS in 2024, Kaiser continued in 2026

2026: Kaiser Permanente engaged in attempted murder, medical malpractice, fraud, and other harms

2026: Epstein's and Kaiser Permanente's Kaiser Air joined KKR in stalking and death threats

2026: Kaiser Permanente began to harm Editor's wife by not providing her staffing support

2026: Kaiser Permamente denied Editor repeatedly for medical records requests proving defamation

2026: Editor filed grievance against Caitlin Sperling/Dr. Kingstone for falsifying records

2026: Editor filed grievance against Caitlin Sperling/Dr. Kingstone for denying records

2026: Editor filed grievance against Dr. Kingstone for attempted murder prescribing drugs to kill

2026: Editor filed grievance against Caitlin Sperling for fabricating false appointments/conversations

11/2/26: Kaiser member services spent an hour on grievances and proved no appointments were made

2026: Editor uses three artificial intelligence platforms to reprove all the crimes against him are real

2026: Editor uses AI to prove Trump, GOP, Cannon, GOP SCOTUS, et al. are disqualified from office

2026: Editor uses AI to prove that they are de facto officers whose changes/roles void from conception

2026: Editor uses AI to prove disqualified GOP crime syndicate goes back to Nixon; tolling+estoppel

2026: Editor uses AI to prove Epstein-Trump-Russia crime syndicate born of Hapsburg crime syndicate

2026: Editor published the legal arguments for the sake of others and contacted Congress

2026: Congress and a congressional investigator asked Editor to stay in touch and to keep informing

2026: Editor stalked/threatened by SacPD/SacSheriff flying 4 cities off course to divebomb his home

2026: Editor stalked/threatened by TVPX linked to Trump's 2016 Russian oligarchs and Warren Buffet

Nexus: Epstein's flight logs include Warren Buffet's/TVPX' NetJets stalking/threatening Editor

Nexus: Epstein's Warren Buffet's/TVPX' FlexJets also stalking/threatening Editor

Nexus: Epstein's Warren Buffet is a long-time financial partner with Epstein's Bill Gates

Nexus: Bill Gates' Microsoft significantly harmed Editor, and Gates cashed out of Microsoft 2026

Nexus: Epstein's Gates and UK royals found to have been conduits to Putin in EFTA 2026

Nexus: Igor Sechin's former Bombardier Global 6000 was re-registered to TVPX

Nexus: Igor Ivanovich Sechin is considered a close ally and "de facto deputy" of Vladimir Putin

Nexus: Trump's MCC whose pilots are linked to Epstein and Putin are stalking/threatening Editor

Nexus: TXPX manages Cambridge Analytica's Steve Bannon's/Ruemmler's Goldman Sachs fleet

Nexus: Trump visited MCC whose 2016 conspiracy network still stalks/threatens Editor with death