08/03/2026
Jeffrey Epstein's and Deepak Chopra's Kaiser Permanente is now too easily and provably involved in the "grand conspiracy" of Jeffrey Epstein's and his associates' ongoing crimes against their victims, including the Editor of UPRights News, for 24 continuous years, in a kind of take over your life manner, and that's the point. Anyone reading the lawsuits against Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and/or Leon Black quickly recognize a pattern of physical and emotional abusers, who after (gang) raping, sodomizing, sodomizing with tools and/or (as) sex toys, beating them, and then followed by threats to stalk, intimidate, and/or murder them and/or their families.
https://fightingmonarch.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/doe-v.-black-opinion-and-order.pdf
They use all sorts of tactics, including scaring the crap out of the public, making examples of the groups of people they seek to intimidate -- victims, witnesses, law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, inspector generals, attorneys general, members of Congress, U.S. attorneys, journalists, university professors, whistleblowers, and law firms, but not at all limited to the same.
They are able to influence national and global elections to always pay for the winning governments, who they then weaponize against their victims and anyone who can identify or help a victim.
They are able to influence who gets hired and who gets fired in society. Who gets billions to trillions in taxpayer funds -- usually companies and individuals linked to the treasonous child sex traffickers are who receive the largest contracts, whose terms they almost always violate and have to pay back -- but then they use their RICO corruption, bribery, and obstruction of public offices they have bribed to corrupt justice for victims.
And in our Editor's case, Epstein's "associates" were able to control his family, their gainful employment, and their "healthcare" --or in our Editor's case the repeated and provable functional abandonment of his healthcare -- through Kaiser Permanente's abuses of our Editor's wife for her whistleblowing patient safety as a supervisor for years, and her whistleblowing being mostly functionally ignored FOR YEARS, leaving his wife to train hundreds of staff members with little to no support given to much smaller hospitals provided teams for her responsibilities -- the evidence of retaliation against the peripheral network of not one but two Kaiser Permanente whistleblowers, each and both actionable, and worse, ongoing.
And there is a pattern of this level of harm for decades being wielded in the same way against other Epstein victims and investigators, and so our Editor's documented and provable harm is corroborated not just by his evidence, but by the testimony of other victims. The point is to constantly trigger the lymbic and sympathetic nervous system -- the fight or flight system -- of not just Epstein's victims, but anyone who dares provide a victim justice, so that no one will, which is what happened to our Editor and to the other Epstein victims.
As we have reported, including to the DOJ with a million pages of Epstein evidence now missing from the DOJ's files, these two parallel and merged victim paths of the Editor and the sex trafficked children has/have been going on since at least 1988, then in earnest by the turn of the millennium, followed escalation after Epstein was prosecuted the first time, but barely.
Another goal of this conduct is to intentional inflict severe emotional distress in not just the Epstein victims, but anyone who dares try and help them out of serious decades of stalking and harm -- RICO obstruction of justice involving bribery of public officials veiled as campaign donations and gifts, followed by their corrupt behavior outside of official capacity and outside of immunity, not protecting victims, so that they have to continue to be harmed continuously, which of course results in a need for mental health services, by engineering such a level of ongoing harm, coupled to the ongoing RICO obstruction of that harm, which engineers or intentionally inflicts the serious emotional harm in ongoing victims of Epstein's associates to the level that results in some of them being "suicided", like Virginia Guiffre. And so it isn't that Guiffre had mental problems that U.S. law enforcement needed to ignore, it is that they engineered her mental problems with their RICO obstructive behavior, joining the conspiracy of harm by Jeffrey Epstein and his "associates".
This is clearly achieved by constantly organizing or planning harm, which our Editor eventually started to document (see our Terror Log section) because the pattern was so obvious, but he needed to prove the harm he was enduring, and that documentation when compared to the elements of law, their sources, and their authorities, created some legal paths for our Editor to try and stop this harm, which included Kaiser repeatedly abandoning the standard of care in the treatment of this enormous harm, but in conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein, who orbit has a stranglehold on the medical treatment of incapacitated and at-risk children at least in the Northern California Area, as we can prove beyond all reasonable doubt, and have across our reporting.
Using artificial intelligence lawyers, our Editor was quickly informed of the nature of all of this harm, further corroborating his heavy evidence -- roughly half of the missing DOJ Epstein files is an estimate -- and then the DOJ files that were released, filled in the few blanks left to fill in that our Editor had not already elucidated to the DOJ on August 29, 2024 in Seattle, WA, were under camera and in writing he deposited his million or so Epstein pages of evidence to the DOJ, who is now covering that up to protect Trump and themselves from lawfully being removed from office because of the nature of their conduct, which U.S. laws can't support, and judges have recognized the same, and the DOJ has now lost its regularity, and may no longer be trusted ruled Judge Sullivan.
And so part of this ongoing conspiracy to inflict severe emotional distress in our Editor and other victims like Guiffre is to "manufacture clinical symptoms resulting from intentional infliction of severe emotional distress that corrupted Northern CA law enforcement can then mischaracterize as a history of mental problems, to investigate their own coconspirators" and thus arguing that victims don't have the right to be harmed if they want justice from that harm, in an impossible justice manner for victims of Jeffrey Epstein -- a RICO obstruction and corruption conspiracy meant to obfuscate the real harm caused by deprivation of rights under color of law and in retaliation of protected whistleblowers and victims -- to ultimately in an ongoing manner RICO obstruct justice for Epstein victims in this complex and comprehensive manner, and totally explains why Epstein's victims have really seen little to no justice for decades of crimes against them, for which every incident could result in a 20 year prison sentence, and now visit our Terror Log section, where we developed "statistical intent".
Statistical intent is proven beyond a reasonable doubt by repetition or patterns of misconduct, where the first time a conspirator harmed our Editor or other Epstein victims, maybe the same was a misunderstanding, or an honest error, and not intentional, but then when the same people, organizations, and agencies continue the pattern of criminality or harm, then it becomes less and less probable they aren't intending to do the same, and depending on the nature of the harm, statistical intent is proven beyond all reasonable doubt, which doesn't mean no doubt, it means reasonable doubt. So in our Terror Log documentation, the same individuals, organizations, and agency employees were regularly involved in the harm against our Editor, proving their statistical intent beyond a reasonable doubt, whereafter all of those types of attacks suddenly ceased in the last week or so, after 10 years of ongoing harm, statistical intent.
And so we blew the whistle against Kaiser in 2024 at the DOJ, linking Epstein's crimes to Kaiser in the same broader conspiracy to RICO obstruct justice for government fraud, medical malpractice, medical abandonment, medical fraud, whistleblower retaliation, and/or other harm caused by other conspirators -- who slipped extremely defamatory and false information into our Editor's mental health record, accusing him retroactively of diagnoses they never brough up with him, never sent him to classes for, nor recommended the same, nor treated him for, instead slipping in that he had schizophrenia, as we wrote one of the largest whistleblower complaints in history implicating them, and so you can see faked and retroactively-submitted diagnoses or concerns being manufactured -- well outside of the duty of care to any patient by identifying medical problems the medical professional concealed in order to harm by not treating the same, and also using the same to save their medical licenses.
Our Editor has written 10 books, hundreds of articles, has been a serial business owner, graduate business professor hand-picked from thousands of others by his university 3 times in 6 years, picked by the university to lead 20 other professors in product development, picked by the top medical school in the country for an internship for medical research management, based on a never-before-seen sophisticated clinical trial protocol he wrote for Stanford University Medical School. He has three university degrees, when most Americans don't have one. And he has law school exposure to elements of law, their sources, and their authorities, and as a victim of ongoing crimes reported them to Kaiser, including the known and concealed murder and endangerment of children, which Kaiser was mandated to report, but have they? If they have not, there is their intent.
A shout out here also to Trump's "Beautiful Mind boxes", where our Editor and Jack Smith can prove our Editor's RICO obstructed investigation ended up, and is the reason Trump named those boxes after our Editor's investigation materials (stolen allegedly by Mark Meadows and brought to Trump and retroactively declassified after they were caught -- seems to be the case), which tell a tale nearly identical to Russell Crow's film "The Beautiful Mind".
Since then our Editor has developed painful "lumps" in his breast tissue, maybe Litvinenko-style, coupled to Kaiser refusing to provide our Editor with the standard of care again for breast health, which is a mammogram and ultrasound, seemingly blackmailing our Editor into a "genital check" (Kaiser knowing our Editor is an Epstein victim is intentional infliction of severe emotional distress) and "drug test", instead and/or as a precondition to imaging his palpable and painful lumps in his breast.
Trained in medical research at the top schools in the U.S. , our Editor patently "refused consent" to fondling of his genitals with no prior baseline fondling, and refused to be "drug tested" in order to access the standard of care for breast health screen, a mammogram and ultrasound. Having checked with AI, labs may be ordered but are secondary to imaging as the standard of care. Separately, these diagnostics are mutually-exclusive from the perspective, they can be taken in any order, as one diagnostic doesn't affect the values of any other here, if performed one at a time.
Diagnostics collect information the patient's doctor must assess, but not if the doctor's orders continue to be ignored by a radiologist within the Kaiser Roseville-Sacramento (Northern CA Kaiser), who is in a manner their own radiology manner specified didn't sound right on a recorded line (similarly in the 15 or so calls in the last week to schedule the orders, at least one advice nurse and Dr. Kumar's nurse each specified that this is all highly unusual, not normal, irregular, doesn't sound right, and paraphrasing the recorded line here also), Kaiser's own radiology manager specifying that it would be highly irregular to deny access to breast health imaging contingent on breast cancer/health screening, waiting for genital checks and drug testing to be able to provide the standard of care, paraphrasing the recorded conversation (followed by the radiology manager providing her personal phone number as either a protective or obstructive backchannel communication).
On a recorded line she accused Dr. Kumar of not completing order, after order, after order for imaging last week, each of which was ignored by Kaiser's radiology department and scheduling, except the first order, when they booked him an afternoon appointment the same day he asked for the same, so no backlog of patients explaining the delay to and/or abandonment of his access to medicine. This was something else, and something every Kaiser employee he was contacting was specifying was irregular, odd, not right, paraphrasing, and on recorded lines.
This radiology manager further specified that the doctor was refusing to return communications to the radiologist, which we knew was false, as he had reached out to the radiology appointment after they disappeared his appointment, to follow up with their specific needs, followed by them rejecting their own specified needs.
The radiology manager further specified that the doctor and not the radiologist was who was demanding obstructive and refused genital checks and drug testing to access breast health diagnosis, in a let me feel you up or else you are going to die manner. Except the doctor has never performed a genital check on our Editor, and thus would have no baseline to compare to. And arguably a drug test has zero to do with radiology's ability to image with mammogram and ultrasound, and where the same is warranted, as our Editor has had these lumps for months, they are increasingly painful and all of that is being ignored by the radiologist, who really should know better, and where undiagnosed breast cancer can kill in weeks, and men get breast cancer too.
At first our Editor was abandoned and his radiology appointment disappeared based on gender discrimination, Kaiser Lincoln facility informing him that they won't provide breast health imaging to men -- who might have breast cancer -- instructing him that only Roseville could provide him this service locally.
This is the facility where our Editor's wife works, and the same location she has been an internal whistleblower for, and where we just learned that peripheral harm to a whistleblower is also actionable, and so here, Kaiser has two whistleblowers against them who are married, one who whistleblew internally and then faced adverse employment harm, and the other who whistleblew externally to the DOJ within about a million of the missing Epstein files.
The fact that they are missing is proof of consciousness of guilt, which Todd Blanche has since admitted to as proof of guilt, and which Judge Sullivan just defanged by ruling against regularity for the DOJ, and evidence of a judge ruling on effectively the consciousness of guilt (of all conspirators including Kaiser). Other "discredited" or "uncorroborated" victims and their statements to the government on Epstein are in the DOJ files, so where are our missing million pages? How can this be anything but willful and intentional concealing, destruction, harboring, and/or RICO obstruction of justice and Congress?
Democrats have since this week demanded all files be released and unredacted, and Judge Sullivan has demanded all files be provided to him, and we have contacted his office to let them know what is missing, specified across our reporting, which serves as a quick cross reference. For example, Editor accused Kaiser with Epstein et al. by 2024, where are those Kaiser-linked Epstein documents?
Then as part of the 25+ or so visits, emails, and phone calls to Kaiser facilities and staff in the last week to schedule the doctors three orders, I let the doctor know what I was being told on recorded lines, that Kaiser Roseville required two orders and not just one, and so the doctor specified he would reach out to them, find out what they needed, and would take care of the same, as any good doctor would, after the lumps turned out to be palpable and sore and not the inflamed muscle fibers the doctor suspected MONTHS earlier, and where cancer can kill in weeks.
The doctor put in these orders, so now 3 orders from the only doctor that has seen me for this, the only person who saw me in clinic, my personal physician, ordering the hospital to image me so to rule out breast cancer is the gravest concern, repeatedly communicated to staff members as a concern, who have collectively failed to allow access to medicine in a manner that they have specified themselves on recorded lines they find irregular -- now in-fighting with the need for a winner between them -- because the radiologist has gone totally rogue and is refusing to image what could be a life-threatening disease -- their intent to not identify a possible life-threatening illness in time, to murder an Epstein victim who provably blew the whistle against them, is ugly stuff indeed.
But fortunately for all but the Editor, as our Editor isn't a schizophrenic, and has trained in both medicine and law, he is able to organize the proof of their crimes, which a schizophrenic wouldn't be able to do, as their claims have no reasonable basis, unlike the Editor of www.uprightsnews.com.
These next two print screens illustrate, and in fact document, internal lies and deceptions of Kaiser staff, and our bet is on the radiology department as the culprit -- when compared to the content of the recorded lines, documented by our Editor as soon as possible thereafter, within minutes.
More specifically, the radiology manager, whose staff was violating the standard treatment of care and their own SOPs, by not returning calls to the Editor within 24 hours, as specified as a requirement on at least one of the recorded calls, said on a recorded line that a radiologist assigned to this patient was the person refusing the scheduling, in some sort of email fight with the doctor she said, blaming the doctor for bad orders (and yet a mammogram and ultrasound are two of the easiest and most commonly ordered procedures for more than half of all Kaiser patients, who perform the same regularly as females, and where men get breast cancer too, and they are not from another planet, and so ultrasound and mammograms also diagnose men for breast cancer.
How many of Kaiser's female patients had to submit to a genital check and drug test before each of them was allowed to be scheduled for a mammogram and ultrasound as a percent? Probably close to zero, because these are mutually exclusive diagnostics. Genital checks are for genital health. Drug tests are for mental health. Most women probably aren't blackmailed into drug testing and genital fondling (without a baseline) in order to gain access to breast health diagnostics. This is why so many different Kaiser employees on recorded lines keep saying this is not right. This is wrong. Now it is provably wrong, and now we also have evidence of consciousness of guilt, because now they are in-fighting each blaming the other, but their recorded lines and my emails with them prove the lies, as follows.
On a recorded line, Kaiser's Roseville radiology manager specified on 8/3/26 a new excuse for medical abandonment, medical fraud, medical malpractice, whistleblower retaliation, and/or other harm -- that the reason our Editor was being denied access to a mammogram and ultrasound was because the radiologist objected to orders that have nothing to do with them -- specifically stating-paraphrasing the radiologist was refusing to schedule mutually exclusive orders from the doctor because the radiologist didn't agree with two orders -- specifically, the genital check and the drug testing -- as the radiology manager's and/or department's newest and ever-changing excuse(s) for why the radiologist prohibited scheduling of breast health mammogram and ultrasound.
The radiology manager also specified she wasn't licensed on the recorded call, and so an unlicensed manager of radiology operating in Northern California, managing the medical care of others without a medical license. Now, this next email from the doctor specified it was the radiology department who ordered the drug tests and the genital checks, in total conflict with what the radiology manager said on a recorded line. This email was received by our Editor BEFORE the radiology manager lied and said the doctor hadn't responded to the radiologist, which was provably false. Because the email received in advance of this recorded call, below, proves the doctor did contact the radiologist, who was the one who left the note shared by the doctor here, the radiologist ordering the tests and demanding genital checks, and drug testing, AND most importantly, specifying none of the same might be relevant at all, so the radiologist here specifying that really none of these tests might find anything at all.
Furthermore, our Editor only met with his doctor in clinic, not with the obstructing and wildly-rogue radiologist refusing doctor's orders, demanding drug testing and genital checks in a blackmail manner to access breast health, which after refusing consent on a recorded line the radiology manager attempted to convince the Editor to be subjected to regardless, furthering intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. Once the Editor let the manager know consent for the genital tests and consent from the drug testing had been revoked, and where the manager separately on the recorded line specified shock towards the Editor's doctor, she urged him to subject himself to the same regardless. But as he had revoked consent, now she knew that the drug tests and the genital check was no longer obstructing, at which point she needed to schedule, but she refused, and hoped for the best by today.
And so the recorded conversations with the radiology manager, when compared to the emails sent before those calls, which she couldn't see, prompted her to lie, and to cover it up, as an unlicensed manager of a medical facility. When our Editor demanded the name of this radiologists, she said on a recorded line that she did not know who the radiologist was, and later on recorded line, she said she would be checking with that radiologist, and would get back to me. So the clear liar here is the unlicensed manager of Northern CA's radiology department, is a reasonable inference, and in conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein, per our missing million pages of Epstein evidence disclosed to DOJ August 29, 2024.
At the beginning of this article, we started with DOJ Epstein evidence of Deepak Chopra asking Jeffrey Epstein for some corporate clients, and then we asked ChatGPT if Chopra's Jiyo had ever developed a legal partnership, and ChatGPT specified yes, they had, but not as I remembered the same, linked to University of California, who we named as a conspirator with Epstein and Kaiser, and since then we have found so much more proof of all of this.
And so after Epstein rigged the 2016 elections -- which is what we let the DOJ and Congress know our Editor could prove with evidence and law well beyond a reasonable doubt by 2024-present -- in order to RICO obstruct the 09/21/2014 RICO obstruction of our Editor, also disclosed to DOJ with proof of the same -- conspirators and their employees were meeting with Epstein regularly. In fact the DOJ files when coupled to ours prove Epstein laundered money through University of California in a similar manner he had done to Roche, moving his blackmail and child sex trafficking funds through other conspirators, many of whom we are able to prove were also his forced victims, Epstein forcing victims to victimize others, and sometimes financing those who played along, or could serve his needs. And with the context that Chopra asked Epstein for corporate clients who would be involved in online medical record keeping, ChatGPT specified a legal partnership between Kaiser and Chopra.
During that relationship, Epstein cryptically emailed Chopra and cryptically referenced the bible passages of Joseph, thrown into a pit by his brothers (which is literally what our Editor believes his Sacramento freemason brothers did to him as specified in his DOJ whistleblown complaint, along with all of the evidence that proved the same "beyond a reasonable doubt", said Jack Smith of those files -- DOJ agreed in writing and under camera to conduit to Jack Smith on August 29, 2024).
And so in the context there is evidence -- that Epstein laundered money, specifically $25,000, to Chopra, and University of CA, through Jiyo, which sought corporate clients from Epstein like Kaiser, and in the context Kaiser was one of Jiyo's and UC's partners, it is a reasonable inference Epstein is who connected Epstein and Kaiser. We can connect Epstein to Kaiser through Roche, and also through KKR's Reach Air and KKR's Cal-Star, all linked to Jeffrey Epstein and to Henry Kravis, who then also connects to many other conspirators in almost a hub-like manner for our Terror Log reporting -- Epstein referenced our Editor's situation (the brother being thrown into a pit by his brothers, which also happened in CA), followed by Chopra cryptically letting Epstein know he had "slipped into" a related matter weeks earlier and the matter he slipped into was "perfect" to their/his "peace".
Followed by Epstein specifying what might be slipped into concerned Kaiser Permanente, who he jested, had a reputation for the opposite of how our Editor (brother from the pit) was being treated, Epstein linking the fallen brother, something Chopra slipped into perfectly), specifying he was "IN" what he slipped into weeks earlier. Every criminal investigator here needs to investigate anyone and everyone who ever gained access to our Editor's medical record, with the exception of his wife, who has permission.
And if Chopra was "IN" our Editor's Kaiser medical records at this emailed date and time in 2017, then game over, we win it all. Someone needs to beeline to this, to rule this in or out, but with more context, and not in Chopra's nor Kaiser's favor.
Chopra had specified weeks earlier he had slipped into something the one conversations linked to both the fallen or slipped brother, betray by his brothers, and that tangent was immediately clarified and cryptically Epstein said it was Kaiser Epstein "had been told" (presumably by Kaiser or a proxy of Epstein and/or Kaiser is a reasonable inference).
And so we went back weeks in the DOJ files to find out if there was anything there and found Chopra specifying he had some good news (later saying he slipped into something connected to a fallen/slipped brother connected to Kaiser Permanente). The reasonable question here is if Chopra slipped into the Kaiser medical records of our Editor, in the context Kaiser had conspired to retroactively slip in a schizophrenia diagnosis or concern, which no other evidence supports they ever communicated to him (standard of care), diagnosed him for (standard of care), treated him for (standard of care), and thus solely existed for someone to weaponize against him later if he came forward again above the unanswered crimes he had reported, including Kaiser in that mix, by 2014, so well before Chopra and Epstein are discussing financing Chopra after he found great news around the time he was slipping into something linked to the slipped brother and to Kaiser). He may not have done any of this, but now a criminal investigation is warranted to rule out the same, but also to rule out and to identify EVERY person or organization or software that was able to access this defamatory and RICO obstructing medical record.
And weeks before Chopra slipped into something that was perfect for (Epstein's) peace, linked to the fallen brother, and linked to his medical provider, Kaiser Permamente, Chopra concluded he found something during his online medical records company development era that was "good news" for Epstein.
Epstein asked or stated that "better" to Chopra, and where having gone across lots of DOJ Epstein files, it is clear he regularly and cryptically and sometimes directly but also indirectly threatened his victims. For example, to another victim he only responded "produce", as in get it done or else. In other cases, like for Peter Thiel, he threatened him with death is a reasonable inference, threatening Thiel with someone they both knew being "suicided". And so as an expert in Epstein's crimes, we recognize as his victims this "better" translated in this tone to a release of blackmail pressure waged at Chopra, who above had to provide Epstein "updates", or else what? And what was Chopra's cryptic response to Epstein specifying "better" with the "good news", you guessed it, "the lion is hungry". So ZERO doubt of cryptic communications regarding "good news" from "weeks earlier", when Chopra slipped into something linked to the fallen brother and his medical provider, who was a partner of Chopra's online medical records organization, after asking Epstein for clients who may have been the ones who "told" Epstein.
Months after Chopra specified he was "IN" with respect to Epstein specify "Kaiser Permanente", in a manner they could describe as perfect for them for their peace, which by the afternoon in June 2017, Chopra was asking for more compensation, specifically corporate clients, after Epstein mentioned Kaiser -- Epstein directed Richard Khan to money launder child sex trafficking and blackmail operations funds through University of CA, already in established conspiracy with them, and/or through Jiyo, to "buy research" developed with someone who had developed an online medical records company and partnered with our Editor provider, arguably here to sell our Editor's tainted, falsified, and RICO corrupting and obstructing medical record to Jeffrey Epstein, is a reasonable inference, but one that needs to be investigated more to make it more than an inference. These hands are fitting these gloves.
And so above, they had cryptically hashed out this marvelous plot, which they seemed to have thwarted, when after "buying research" for $25,000 from the University of CA, but specifying the research was for savants (which might well describe our Editor is in part provable), Chopra in a single email changes what is a fake legal agreement and arrangement here proven by the emails themselves, Chopra suddenly pivoting and asking for the money to be sent to him instead of to the University who was selling the research, and suddenly pivots to let's make this a grant in a sentence, followed by no evidence of legal agreement language being changed to reflect stealing $25,000 of research from the university, to be able to grant Chopra's non-profit in a last minute pivot manner, which neither Epstein nor Khan challenged in any manner, proving the cryptic conspiracy is a reasonable inference, but provably or seemingly defrauding and/or stealing from the State of CA, a potentially documented victim here for this particular matter.
And so proof of foul play here is that within the 11 minutes of Chopra totally changing the nature of this legal agreement to fund in conspiracy with University of CA (who was to be kept in the loop), Epstein and Khan agreed to launder $25,000 into Chopra's organization, who separately developed corporate clients, and where they made reference to corporate client Kaiser Permanente, currently blackmailing an Epstein victim into a genital check and drug test in order to be image for breast cancer, or else refusing to provide access to medicine, medical insurance, medical practice, medical care, possibly life-saving diagnostics and treatments, but only if detected in time, and here every possible effort to deny our Editor access to standard of care in a timely manner, with empty appointments and abandoned orders waiting to be filled by Jeffrey Epstein's Kaiser Permanente, is a reasonable inference, based on the evidence, circumstances, chronology, and elements of law.