05/05/2026
Today, in pursuit of information that further (and nearly perfectly) supports our hypotheses across our reporting -- we mined a pretty big data of the Epstein files set using Claude AI, who admittedly refuted some of our key findings today -- but who has agreed to those findings elsewhere at other times in an inconsistent manner, sometimes telling us things we know are not true, other times teaching us new things, and so kind of like riding a bull, sometimes you can stay on, and sometimes you can't, because Epstein-linked AI "bucks" you.
We wouldn't be providing fair and balanced reporting or testing of the truth if we didn't tell you that Claude did not find "The Prince Andrew Treatment" by Brockman and Epstein to be coercive nor blackmail-like, despite Maxwell mentioning Leon Black was a "spigot" that would soon "dry", which Claude dismissed as not blackmail, and despite 5th Amendment invocation by not Wexner (correction) but by someone testifying in Southern Florida, said Claude.
Similarly, Claude refused to acknowledge that "all of Jeffrey Epstein's finances" were analogous to a "pizza", and that the $40 million he invested into Peter Thiel of Palantir for a different company, was not a slice of Epstein's financial pizza, and so that is what prompted us to quit our membership.
When you say this is the whole thing "the whole pizza", and a slice of that pizza is not a part of that whole thing, because AI won't recognize a slice is part of a pizza, then it is time to move on. It is like saying sand is not part of the solar system, because it is only sand, and requiring that sand needs to be treated separately (special treatment) than the solar system it is part of, because sand is not part of the solar system is the final argument, is kind of how it was reasoning, kind of like a defense attorney trying to convince me black is white.
And so we didn't take the time to load all the financials for Black into the system to prove to AI the facts exist, but we did cancel our membership, as why bother fighting technology designed to defend these others? A slice of Epstein's total financials doesn't include his investments using his ill-got gains is rich!
So we argued as a fiduciary (Thiel), Epstein was subject to influencing Thiel, and well, that almost broke Claude, who then vomited all sorts of evidence and arguments against Thiel and Gates and Barak, almost apologetically, then Claude essentially threatened to stop playing with us, while we debated blackmail, coercion, and influence evidence harming the billionaires by Epstein.
Our understanding of our key findings today:
1. EFTA01959043: Circa September 2013 $300 million "gift" organized by Epstein, through or in association with Bill Gates and/or his proxies, is on par with what Leon Black and/or Wexner have reported as "fees" and "theft", anywhere between about $150M-$500M for them, and so we see Epstein controlling where about $500-$800 million between Gates, Black, and/or Wexner, which is highly suggestive of ways to launder blackmail and/or exert influence on Gates, Black, Wexner, and/or others, and where directing and controlling the wealth of others in your name is as alpha chimp a move as Epstein could make, and did, exerting influence on Gates, Black, Wexner, Putin, and/or others, by controlling their finances, is a reasonable inference. The $300 million then either floats towards cancer research and/or Epstein, and where cancer research funds may often land on the likes of the lap of Roche, and thus benefit Edge Foundation's Maja Hoffman;
2. EFTA02410268 and EFTA00755854: Edge Foundation's Maja Oeri Hoffman's husband, Stanley Buchthal of Art House Films made at least one film with a Michael Epstein, LennonNYC, and had a showing "For Mr. Jeffrey Epstein" in 2010, post-conviction of Epstein, is similar to Bill Gates' donations "on behalf of Epstein" post-conviction -- everyone serving Epstein again in a cult-like manner, in a type of master-slave relationship, where he is almost always the master;
3. EFTA01463581 and EFTA01463144 may reveal some Epstein-Bronfman (NXIVM child sex trafficking ring overlap financing) mixing of finances in a manner Epstein could then leverage as blackmail or influence later, and important to NXIVM-linked Roger Stone joining Steve Bannon and Paul Manafort to help Trump, Russia, Epstein, and others "engineer" Epstein's Trump instead of Epstein's Clintons into Office for Epstein's Rosneft/Alfa Bank, while Epstein chimped Putin's account as Putin's wealth manager, and so again, through our lens, all we see is levers of influence being used by Epstein to force these folks into doing things they wouldn't normally do, then we also found Leon Black who was we think clearly blackmailed by Epstein/Maxwell/Maxwell's sister/Brockman is our read of their emails, and we found that Leon Black was perhaps forced by Epstein to finance Jared Kushner's purchase of a building with the address 666, because of course, and that puts Black in the control of Kushner, while Epstein is control of Black, putting Epstein in control over Kushner, via control over Black. Kushner's wife was also named in the client and operations contact book of Epstein, and so more than one way Epstein could exert pressure, coercion, blackmail, fiduciary control of, some to all of these others is in support of our testing of our hypothesis here. EFTA00019148 is an SEC whistleblower on the irregular nature of the Kushner-Black-Epstein funds and blowing the whistle on government corruption regarding the same, as a sign that funds were not properly being moved or used in a manner that caused this whistleblower to erupt, and then some, a true American hero;
4. EFTA02858497 illustrates potential blackmail Epstein had on Trump beyond Stacy Williams, Ivanna Kamensky, Katie Johnson, and/or others, with reports of a victims being sex trafficked to Trump, which of course is material Epstein could use against Trump, at the same time he is in control of Kushner, Putin, Black, and/or others to literally act like an orchestra maestro coordinating the song "Engineer Epstein into More Power Over More Leaders Faster so That he Can Control Everyone in the World Faster (is the Gist of the ) Song";
5. EFTA02112575 is the 16th Annual Edge Dinner in 2014, so Edge begins 1998, a year before DOJ specifies Roche is the most corrupt company in US history;
6. EFTA01934512, EFTA02361899, EFTA02563769, EFTA00040401, and EFTA00359768, Edge Foundation asking members what they are worried about in 2013, when our Editor is writing a lawsuit against them on Edge Foundation technologies, followed by a confidential meeting in "Canada" 2014 to discuss what is making Edge Foundation participants "crazy" (Editor's research into their organized crimes on their technology is a solid guess, would that make you crazy?), prior to Editor being obstructed by those on their company payrolls via campaign contributions, followed by a meeting a month, then two after his investigation into them was obstructed by GOP Sacramento via Scott Jones and Ann Marie Schubert, sharing the same consultant Dave Gilliard, whose wife was the appellate judge also denying coram vobis hearing to not hear the evidence, forced to recuse, and then there is the $300 million in COVID funds disappeared by Scott Jones et al., and which may have resulted in unnecessary COVID deaths needing investigation, and by 2014 Edge Foundation has meetings with Roche, Thiel, Gates, Russians linked to meetings with Thiel, Leon Black, Milner, and discussions about Putin by Edge Foundation 2014, the same year our Editor's investigation into Edge Foundation, Russians, Trump orbit, and others is unlawfully seized by Leon Black's University of Phoenix Gateway Oak Campus' Sacramento Police and GOP's Scott Jones, and then distributed to Edge Foundation members, and/or others named in the investigation on behalf of the US government, RICO obstructed by the criminal faction operating within the same. Delario fingers Russians, Kushner, Black, Epstein, Blackrock, and/or others in all sorts of what could be argued are concealed blackmail money laundering against these billionaires Epstein kept targeting to increase his power over them and others is our running hypothesis, and he does so at the key times 2013 EFTA00029043;
7. EFTA00027019 we have what looks like Epstein blackmailing the Rothchilds days before Russia cyberattacked our investigation 10/20/2013 into Edge Foundation, Russia, Trump orbit, and the like, supra;
8. EFTA01660906 and EFTA01698964 Epstein's operations in Australia and other evidence proves is still operational and threatening others well after his death proves our narrative is a pattern, supra;
9. EFTA01721823 horrific Epstein stories out of Africa (where Russia raced over to, in the context that Russia's Putin is wanted by the UN ICC for trafficking children, in the context Don Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and Russia Rosneft sanctions/Russian adoptions lawyer meeting June 2016 at Trump Tower) provided to Letitia James;
10. EFTA02412161 Epstein organized with others to have Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google make it easier for whistleblowers to report, when we can prove they retaliated against us for 22 years because of our whistleblowing, so it seems this was more of an early warning system by Epstein's Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google to identify whistleblower to obstruct, and thus helps prove the narrative Gates, Black, Thiel, Russians, and the like were meeting before and after cyberattacking and actually attacking the Editor and his investigation, where they were looking for whistleblowers, found our Editor, then let others know what the Editor was up to, suing them, and so they conspired with others to RICO obstruct that circa dec 2012+ through to this day, supra;
11. EFTA01683874 Epstein as Putin's wealth manager, put Putin in a Leon Black spigot being bled dry type of arrangement with Epstein, lording over Putin in this manner he did with Black, Wexner, Gates, and/or others is reasonable;
12. EFTA02813347 more questions as to whether or not Epstein influenced or blackmailed Microsoft, Gates, Google, their founders, Musk, Telsa, and/or others to move to JP Morgan or other Epstein banks resulting in Epstein financing them and/or influencing their accounts would be more evidence of financial control over them and blackmail is reasonable, and them doing as he said in a manner that financed him, furthering his sex trafficking financing operations implied USVI AG lawyers;
13. EFTA02035054 totally different account of "prince" Andrew which could have been used to blackmail SCL and Cambridge Analytica's conduct with Facebook and Twitter, Milner, Kushner, Black, Edge Foundation, and it all starts to blur together, but with Epstein clearly directing everyone, as far as we can see, until he is rearrested after he threatens Bannon with "I am a firm believer in time's up", again a blackmail reference is our read, and Epstein able to blackmail Bannon;
14. EFTA02496272 Brockman and Epstein discussing "the Prince Andrew Treatment", which is arguably a reference to blackmail results if non-compliant with Epstein, directed at those Edge Foundation members not responding fast enough, Brockman discussing photos and bad press as part of "treatment";
15. EFTA01613982 Epstein discussing Paxum Bank (see our reporting on Paxum Bank, Putin, PornHub, and ES family Trust, Trump Media, and Friends of Ron DeSantis), linking Epstein to all of that; and
16. EFTA01656686 one of many payment between Epstein and Roche beginning as far back as 2003, when our Editor was suing Roche, and so Epstein involved with Roche and thus likely with Maja Hoffman by 2003, some of these payments were as large as $75,000, and characterized as book transfer debits, whatever that could possibly mean between a sex trafficker and a biotech company.
Accordingly, more and more evidence supports that Epstein was blackmailing, coercing, and/or influencing all of the billionaires and key people that separately harmed the Editor of Uprights News -- Epstein getting victims to harm victims is our hypothesis based on this growing body of evidence.
And so how much choice did any of them have if blackmailed/influenced into doing what Epstein expected of them, or else, The Prince Andrew Treatment, or worse, The Jean Luc Brunel-Epstein Treatment?
