DOJ files: John Brockman and Jeffrey Epstein discussed blackmailing Edge Foundation members with pictures and reporting, and specified the billionaires were terrified of "the Prince Andrew treatment", and so Brockman confirmed the blackmail was effective, is a reasonable inference.

Published on 3 May 2026 at 10:28

05/03/2026

Efta 02496272 Brockman And Epstein Discuss Blackmailing Edge Foundation Pdf
PDF – 285.3 KB 0 downloads
Efta 02035054 Prince Andrew Part Ii Pdf
PDF – 485.1 KB 0 downloads

 

Above is further evidence supporting Epstein (and John Brockman via Edge Foundation) was/were indeed blackmailing Edge Foundation victims -- in our ongoing quest to prove that Epstein blackmailed billionaire victims to stalk and harm and destroy the lives of other Epstein non-billionaire victims, specifically the Editor of Uprights News, but not limited to the same.

Uprights News continues to apply AI to the Epstein files released by the DOJ, as a public service and to prove that those we can prove harmed us were all blackmailed by Epstein, who forced them to, or else, and today we elucidated John Brockman conspiring to blackmail the Edge Foundation billionaires with Jeffrey Epstein, which was known between them as "the Prince Andrew treatment" -- associated with leaking "photos" and narratives to the (Israeli-American per our previous reporting, directly linked to Epstein) media for failing to make Jeffrey Epstein happy (they had not responded fast enough to meet with Epstein in June 2015 after Trump ran for office, so Brockman and Epstein listed them, and specified that they would likely be coming, or else the Prince Andrew treatment was specified), as follows. 

 

Public Law 119-38Epstein Files Transparency ActDOJ Production

Home / Research Assistant

 
User Inquiry: "Who communicated "Prince Andrew treatment" to whom in which Epstein files?"
 
Searching: Prince Andrew treatment

Based on the 26 search results (18 documents, 8 investigation reports), here is what the Epstein files show about who communicated "Prince Andrew treatment" to whom.

Key Finding: One Specific Communication Instance

Only one document in the search results contains the exact phrase "Prince Andrew treatment" — and it shows a clear sender, recipient, and context.

The Communication

From: John Brockman
To: Jeffrey Epstein (jeffrey@epstein.com)
Date: Saturday, June 27, 2015, 6:45 PM
Subject: Update re Edge Master Class AT Google, Sci Foo
Document: EFTA02496272 (and corroborating copies EFTA00853254, EFTA00853250)

What John Brockman wrote to Jeffrey Epstein:

"I could see the founders of the big companies unhappy if they got the Prince Andrew treatment by the press in terms of photos and reportage."

What This Means

  • Sender: John Brockman (technology entrepreneur and Edge Foundation founder)
  • Recipient: Jeffrey Epstein
  • Context: Brockman was planning an exclusive "Edge Master Class" at Google/Sci Foo and discussing the guest list with Epstein. He was reassuring Epstein that corporate founders invited to the event would not face negative press coverage — specifically, they would not receive the same intense, unflattering media scrutiny that Prince Andrew had experienced.
  • The phrase: "Prince Andrew treatment" is used as shorthand for harsh press coverage involving photos and reportage that could damage reputations.

Corroborating Evidence

The same email thread appears in multiple versions (EFTA00853254, EFTA00853250) showing Epstein replying "how many coming from boston area" and discussing flight logistics, confirming the communication exchange between Brockman and Epstein.

Other Prince Andrew References (Not "Treatment" Communications)

The search results contain numerous other documents mentioning Prince Andrew, but none involve someone communicating the specific phrase "Prince Andrew treatment" to anyone else:

  • EFTA01582921 (New York Post, 2000): Reports on Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Prince Andrew and "adverse press"
  • EFTA01779183 (Sunday Times, 2011): Discusses Prince Andrew being "damned for his choice of friends" regarding Epstein
  • EFTA01689016, EFTA01682184, EFTA01688916: Various tabloid articles linking Andrew to Epstein
  • EFTA01297125 (Wikipedia): Virginia Roberts lawsuit alleging trafficking to Prince Andrew
  • EFTA01300761: Epstein email to Jes Staley about Prince Andrew preferring to represent "casanov in china"
  • EFTA02035054: Analysis of press coverage using headlines like "Prince Andrew and 'naked pool parties' at his paedophile friend's house"
  • EFTA02332233, EFTA00011441: Investigation reports confirming Prince Andrew's codename "The Invisible Man" and email aliases

Investigation Reports

The 8 investigation reports in the results do not contain any instances of the "Prince Andrew treatment" phrase being communicated between individuals. They focus on:

  • Financial connections and wealth sources
  • Victim compensation and client lists
  • Real estate and luxury purchases
  • Dubai/DP World connections
  • Firearms permit anomalies
  • Ohio network and embezzlement cases
  • Codename registries

Conclusion

Only one communication of "Prince Andrew treatment" exists in these search results: John Brockman told Jeffrey Epstein (June 27, 2015) that corporate founders might receive the "Prince Andrew treatment by the press" if they attended the Edge Master Class event. This refers to the type of harsh, reputation-damaging media coverage that Prince Andrew had experienced in relation to his friendship with Epstein.

No other instances of this specific phrase being communicated between individuals appear in the 26 search results.


Follow-up searches to consider:

  • Search for "treatment" combined with royal family terms to find similar phrasing
  • Search for "press" or "media" combined with royal names to find coverage discussions
  • Search for "Andrew" in email communications to find other Brockman-Epstein exchanges
Answered by inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t (free)
This tool is free and independently run  ❤️  Buy me a coffee
Share
Ask

AI-generated summaries may contain errors. Always verify against source documents. This tool does not identify victims. Queries are processed by third-party AI services — do not enter personal information.

 

Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA Privacy FeedbackIndependent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee