This week, Congressman Sheldon Whitehouse laid out another legal pathway -- outside of impeachment -- to remove Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and/or orbit from the treason and elections/electoral/voter fraud-got GOP SCOTUS majority -- once again proving that there are many different ways to remove these usurpers corrupting SCOTUS beyond impeachment -- supported by Cornell Law, Yale Law, and San Diego Law, who collectively published additional legal pathways to remove these corrupting usurpers.
"Most everyone assumes that impeachment is the only means of removing federal judges and that the Constitution’s grant of good-behavior tenure is an implicit reference to impeachment. This Article challenges that conventional wisdom. Using evidence from England, the colonies, and the revolutionary state constitutions, the Article demonstrates that at the Founding, good-behavior tenure and impeachment had only the most tenuous of relationships. Good-behavior tenure was forfeitable upon a judicial finding of misbehavior. There would have to be a trial, the hearing of witnesses, and the introduction of evidence, with misbehavior proved by the party seeking to oust the tenured individual. Contrary to what many might suppose, judges were not the only ones who could be granted good-behavior tenure. Anything that might be held—land, licenses, employment, etc.—could be granted during good behavior, and private parties could grant good-behavior tenure to other private individuals. Impeachment, by contrast, referred to a criminal procedure conducted in the legislature that could lead to an array of criminal sanctions. In England and in the colonies, impeachment was never seen as a means of judging whether someone with good-behavior tenure had forfeited her tenure by reason of misbehavior. Whether a landholder, employee, or government officer with good-behavior tenure had misbehaved would be determined in the ordinary courts of law. Moreover, the vast majority of state constitutions did not equate good-behavior tenure with impeachment either. To the contrary, many distinguished them explicitly. Taken together, these propositions devastate the conventional conflation of good-behavior tenure with impeachment. More importantly, they indicate that the original Constitution did not render impeachment the only possible means of removing federal judges with good-behavior tenure. Given the long tradition of adjudicating misbehavior in the ordinary courts, Congress may enact necessary and proper legislation permitting the removal of federal judges upon a finding of misbehavior in the ordinary courts of law."
https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/how-to-remove-a-federal-judge
Similarly, Congressman Whitehouse detailed that a referral to the Attorney General and/or Judicial Council could be made as yet another legal path outside of impeachment to remove these corrupted usurpers.
"Whitehouse outlined his ideas in a lengthy thread on X, which came following reports that Justice Clarence Thomas — already under fire for failing to disclose lavish gifts paid for by billionaires with potential business before the court — took three more previously undisclosed private jet trips with right-wing megadonor Harlan Crow.
"The law is that the Judicial Conference must refer to the Attorney General for investigation any genuine question of 'willful' disclosure failure. It is not clear why that was not done in Round One; Round Two so far remains within the Conference," wrote Whitehouse. "While this went on, I asked the Judicial Conference to review the 'Scalia Trick' — orchestrating a 'personal invitation' from a resort owner for a free vacation and not disclosing it because it was 'personal hospitality.' They blew that trick up."
"It’s not clear how candid Thomas has been with the Judicial Conference about what gifts he received but did not disclose, and why. One of the recurring problems at the Court has been no orderly process for any factfinding," wrote Whitehouse. "It also does not explain Thomas’s incomplete compliance. These were all gifts from Harlan Crow, so why disclose some, but not others? It has long been clear that travel gifts must be disclosed (they were never personal hospitality) so why not disclose the travel gifts? It is hard to find a logical through-line as to what Thomas has and has not disclosed. There is still no complete factual picture about Round One or Round Two of Crow-to-Thomas, let alone the entire billionaire gifts program for Thomas and Alito."
Ultimately, wrote Whitehouse, "The best way through this 'tangled web' is a referral to the Attorney General, per the law. The AG has the resources to investigate properly, is not compromised by judicial peer pressure, and can look at tax and false statements aspects. Remember: disclosure law compliance is not adjudicative; it is administrative — justices are like anyone else in government. If they break the law, it’s no answer to say 'But I’m a justice.' For this, a justice is a government employee, who must obey the law.""
https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-2668531918/
Unfortunately, our research into the Judicial Council pathway has proven that the Judicial Council is also largely illegitimately-installed, because most of those judges were appointed by G.W. Bush after an ongoing conspiracy by the GOP to commit treason, elections/electoral/voter fraud/interference, RICO, and/or obstruction of justice of all of the same as accessories of all of the same.
More specifically, most of the Judicial Council judges were appointed by G.W. Bush -- but per our earlier reporting -- he was unlawfully-engineered into public office by way of the treason and/or elections fraud of G.H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Iran, the Contras, the GOP, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Barrett, John Roberts, Jeb Bush, Clarence Thomas, the GOP SCOTUS majority, and/or others, and/or G.W. Bush and/or the GOP administrations disqualified himself/themselves from public office before and/or after he and the GOP were "engineered" into power in 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_October_Surprise_theory
Per our previous reporting, the GOP administration of G.W. Bush furthered the criminal conspiracy of the 9/11 terrorists by sending away the air guard that would have prevented 9/11 from happening, in "pre-planned" exercises with, you guessed it, U.S. enemy Russia.
Then to give aid, comfort, and/or adhere to Saudi and/or Russian enemies of the United States, G.W. Bush, Trump, the GOP administrations, and/or others concealed evidence from the public regarding the attacks on 9/11, while Jeffrey Epstein's Henry Kissinger did the same as the chair of the 9/11 Commission, rewarded by the GOP, G.W. Bush, Trump, GOP SCOTUS majority, and/or others not allowing Jeffrey Epstein to testify against his elite clients, financiers, and/or associates, including the Saudis, Henry Kissinger, Trump, Rupert Murdoch (Fox News), and/or others, nor allowing any of them to be investigated and/or imprisoned -- as ongoing organized crime would. President Biden has since released evidence concealed by the GOP's Bush and Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's Trump, implicating Jeffrey Epstein's Saudis, who Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's Trump-Kushner family are now business partners with.
Accordingly, an ongoing treason and/or elections fraud conspiracy giving aid, comfort, and/or adhering to U.S. enemies Iran and the Contras immediately disqualified Ronald Reagan and G.H.W. Bush from public offices, BEFORE they installed the GOP SCOTUS majority who immediately disqualified themselves when they conspired to interfere with the 2000 elections to install G.W. Bush in conspiracy with Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Barrett, John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Jeb Bush, and/or others, whose broader GOP administration then immediately disqualified themselves before, during, and after 9/11, before they conspired with Jeffrey Epstein's Federalist Society to unlawfully-stack the SCOTUS and federal judiciary, now consisting in part of the majority of the Judicial Council, and the majority of SCOTUS, including but not limited to the 2000 elections fraud conspirators -- Roberts, Barrett, Thomas, and Kavanaugh, as well as Alito (also illegitimately-installed by G.W. Bush, perfectly explaining his corruption and radicalization in support of the overthrow of the United States per Alito's flaggate crisis, and perfectly explaining his and Thomas' refusal to recuse despite and in spite of the law, further disqualifying them).
Accordingly, like Harvard University, we have independently-concluded that the facts and many laws prove the illegitimacy of ALL of the GOP SCOTUS majority, as well as most of the Judicial Council, half of Congress, Aileen Cannon, Karl Nichols, Trump, and/or others, but not at all limited to the same.
Building on Congressman Whitehouse's pathway, and employing Prakash's and Smith's lower court removal for bad behavior pathway, in order to employ the Judicial Council pathway, a lawsuit in lower courts would first need to remove those disqualified from public offices from the Judicial Council, SCOTUS, the federal judiciary, and Congress, to purge the government of this organized crime racket unlawfully-usurping public offices.
Alternatively, as proposed by Whitehouse, another way would be to attempt to purge the illegitimate and bad behaving SCOTUS and federal judges by way of the Judicial Council and/or Attorney General's Office, who would either prosecute and/or remove this crime syndicate out of public office, which is unlikely in the case of the Judicial Council largely ill-appointed post-treason and/or elections fraud by the GOP, and in the more likely case the Judicial Council wouldn't remove these disabilities, this would pave the path for the removal of the Judicial Council judges voting to not remove illegitimate and corrupted SCOTUS usurpers, in lower courts for bad behavior, a brilliant strategy by Whitehouse.
Our legal research and reporting that found many more legal paths to removing "any person" and "whomever" from "any" public office and from government employment -- including or not specifically excluding SCOTUS judges and corrupted members of Congress refusing to impeach the organized crime syndicate linked to Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and/or orbit usurping the SCOTUS majority -- if they engage in specific bad behavior or not good behavior, and if they do so in bad faith or not good faith, and if they do so to serve themselves, enemies of the United States, seditionists, traitors, insurrectionists, terrorists, organized crime, and/or others not serving the public interest nor interests of the government, majority, nor people.
Furthermore, although the Constitution allows Congress to specifically determine the qualifications of its members, it does not specifically allow Congress to specifically determine the disqualification of its members, and where we have found many laws that when combined with known facts, would indeed require the immediate removal of corrupted members of Congress, SCOTUS, Aileen Cannon, and/or many others by way of their acts and/or the acts of Trump, the GOP, and/or others, as well as any fruits born from their "immediate disqualification", per Baude and Paulsen (02/19/2024).
For example, we have found laws that bar Trump from public office due to EACH of his 34 felony conviction, and separately, due to EACH of his pending felony convictions, but not at all limited to the same.
Similarly and as specified above, we found evidence and laws that all of the GOP SCOTUS were appointed by those who had already immediately disqualified themselves from public offices beforehand, whereafter the GOP SCOTUS majority acted in bad faith against the public's interest, and so voiding all of their rulings and opinions from the very beginning, fruits of the poisonous tree of illegitimacy and bad faith in violation of the public interest. Accordingly, we believe the facts and the law can prove that the GOP SCOTUS majority and many other GOP judges are unlawfully-usurping public offices, supporting Harvard University's conclusion that SCOTUS has a legitimacy problem, and perfectly explaining Roberts' public propaganda that their is no SCOTUS legitimacy problem (from his self-serving perspective). More simply, we believe that there are facts and laws that would prevent the GOP SCOTUS majority and many other ill-appointed GOP judges from legitimately being considered SCOTUS or federal judges before they were appointed, and then thereafter.
As implied by Congressman Sheldon Whitehouse, running for, usurping, and corrupting public office has to cease being a place where treasonous organized crime linked to child sex traffickers hide from prosecution, and help others do the same -- while insincerely crying foul, witch-hunt, and elections interference against anyone trying to hold them accountable for their heinous crimes -- and while insincerely-waving Christian flags, and while embracing the total opposite values of Jesus, like wolves in sheep's clothing would.
We must remove this organized crime syndicate from our government.
Because if we don't --Trump, the GOP, and their organized crime syndicate heavily-linked to child sex traffickers, traitors, seditionists, insurrectionists, terrorists, and organized crime unlawfully-slithering into public offices -- promise to execute, destroy, defund, dismantle, purge, deport, wrongfully prosecute, impeach, recall, and/or sue U.S. law enforcement, U.S. military personnel, U.S. veterans, judges, prosecutors, jurors, witnesses, journalists, academics, whistleblowers, and/or anyone attempting to hold accountable their ongoing organized crime syndicate.
Threatening those who could hold them accountable, pushing for civil war and unrest, stealing elections, and more public corruption are their last flailing defenses -- their very last breath -- and they know it, crying that "they won't have a (our) country anymore" if they don't.
Accordingly, it's us or them, so it's going to be them as a matter of facts and laws beyond a reasonable doubt, unless they employ more organized crime and RICO corruption and obstruction, which they are.
There is no legal path to a legitimate Trump nor GOP presidency nor administration per our swing voter-based research findings -- nor was there before the 2016 elections, if not during the 2000 elections, or as far back as Iran Contra, or even back to the GOP's treason with the Nazis in WWII via Prescott Bush et al. -- and so these are the only ways forward for Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's crime syndicate to "engineer" Trump and the GOP into office illegally, again -- in overt furtherance of an ongoing treason and elections fraud conspiracy by enemies of the United States linked to Russia -- further immediately disqualifying them from public offices if they proceed.
With so much public knowledge available regarding the GOP's ongoing illegitimacy and usurping of public offices, they so desperately need distractions, so they've attacked women's rights to their bodies, they intentionally-released the COVID virus (per Trump's General Mike Flynn), they intentionally infected as many people as possible with COVID (per Trump's Paul Alexander), they called away our airguard to allow terrorists to attack our country on 9/11 to give aid to terrorists, and they have called for unholy holy wars, civil war, world war, and may have already started WWIII in Ukraine and/or Israel -- doing anything and everything they can to unlawfully remain in the key public offices they are unlawfully usurping as enemies of the United States.
Res ipsa loquitur malum in se, this natural evil speaks for itself.
Photo Attribute
