This week, it was reported that UK-based organization, specifically Republic -- who seeks to oust the UK royals as head of state -- called the Metropolitan Police to prompt a criminal investigation into the child rape and/or child sex trafficking claims linked to the UK royals' Prince Andrew, who specified they aren't going to investigate the same, in what amounts to RICO obstruction of justice and/or misprision of felonies in the United States, who shares much of the same legal system as the UK.[2][4]
This places Jeffrey Epstein's UK royals above the law, in a two-tiered system of law, where common people have to follow laws that "royals" don't, giving royals a license to do whatever the hell they want to the people they "lord" over, victimizing their children, spending their tax dollars, sending them to slaughter, and/or other harm.
Almost every day, many of us in the English-speaking world are bombarded by articles across the media spectrum -- branding the family known as the UK and EU "royals" as "royals", and often branding them as victims, heroes, and/or just like you and me sort of propaganda.
Every daily article brands one or more of their faces as "royal", "king", "queen", "prince", "princess", and the like, and where it is well known by learning, branding, and political campaign experts that humans learn by repetition, also known as mimicry.
Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump knows this branding technique employed by "royal" propagandists and has coached his own staff, including but not limited to Stephanie Grisham, how to lie to the public, when he taught her "As long as you keep repeating something, it doesn’t matter what you say.” [3].
Accordingly, even if they weren't royals, the enormous funding required for the English-speaking world to hear over and over and over -- and almost every day if not every day -- that these people are royals, would be enough to convince a lot of the world that they are royals, because of the branding flooding of media outlets that they are.
But if they weren't legitimate royals, then that would significantly change how the law must treat them, because then they would just be a family of people who are branded as royals on almost a daily basis, if not on a daily basis, for which received taxpayer funds would seemingly help offset the cost.
Per www.epsteinsblackbook.com and our previous reporting, Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump and the UK/EU royals have something else in common in that they have been named and even accused and sued for child rape and sex trafficking, with Jeffrey Epstein, and in fact, one of the largest group of people named in Jeffrey Epstein's "little black book" -- which is different than Epstein's "list" (which is largely limited to the prosecution of Epstein's conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, who was frequently evasive when questioned under oath) -- are the UK and EU "royal" families, as we summarized in the following article.
In some of our other reporting, we specified that the UK and EU royals have also been implicated in a number of other crimes and/or scandals and/or with a number of alleged criminals and/or their families, for example but not limited to a number of scandals revolving around their financing and/or the financing of more than one of their charities, involving self-dealings, and/or financial dealings with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, charity financing linked to sex trafficker Hamish Ogston, charity financing linked to 9/11's Bin Laden family, charity financing linked to "bags of cash" scandals for values exceeding a million dollars (which would normally be send over the wire, and where not sending the same over the wire would allow for shady transactions), and in the context that Prince Michael of Kent was accused of selling access to the Kremlin after Russia conspired with the UK royals' directed SCL Group's Cambridge Analytica to "engineer" Trump and Brexit candidates into power, and also allegedly "engineering" the Scottish independence referendum (whereafter the leader of Scotland was conveniently subjected to a criminal probe).
Accordingly, what the UK likes to refer to as "scandals", "rows", and "affairs" -- in the US we refer to the same as crimes, and/or other harm.
Bill Simmons of Spotify summarized working with the UK royals, specified that Harry and/or Markle were "lazy" and "fucking grifters", and so we explored whether or not this history of conduct was part of a broader "grift", by taking a deep dive into the history of their royal claims, which was a terribly long endeavor flooded with pro-royal propaganda, but where the best place to start an investigation like this was a largely pro-royal propaganda site, because if a pro-royal site elucidates cracks in their royal claims, then an anti-royal site would likely elucidate much more was the reasoning.
Supporting our previous reporting, which found major cracks in the royal claims of the Privilegium maius-forged royal claims of the Habsburgs, and which found DNA evidence that Richard III was a bastard, and which found that circumstances and/or the testimonies of people of the day supporting that Edward IV was the son of archer Blaybourne, and/or which found the seemingly inferior and retroactive Beaufort claim by Henry VII, relative to the family of Henry Beaufort, per Salic Law -- we stopped when we roughly reached 50 conclusions, each seemingly a crack in the royal claims of Jeffrey Epstein's UK and EU royals, and each affecting the claims of their descendants. It is our opinion, based on the facts found, that if the royal claims of Jeffrey Epstein's UK and EU royals were the structural supports of a tall building, then that tall building should have crumbled ages ago, and would not have supported adding floors to the top of the building generation after generation, as an analogy.
We welcome any credible evidence to the contrary of our findings, per our legal disclaimer found at the bottom of every article, because we seek the truth, and we understand that new facts and circumstances may alter the understanding of the truth over time.
But based our research, it is difficult to support that the UK and EU royal families are actually legitimately royal, other than huge efforts to revise history and law to pretend and/or "engineer" that they are, based on our understanding of Biblical/Canon laws and Commandments, Carolingian laws of succession, Salic laws of succession, Magna Carta's laws of succession, common laws of succession, and/or other laws, precedence (stare decisis), a priori, and a fortiori, and where it seems any evidence of laws to the contrary are fruits from a poisonous tree of ineligibility or illegally-got lands and titles.
Many alleged royal family members of Europe descend from the Habsburg family, who not only forged their royal claims, but then used the same to gift, award, sell, and/or wish others who had no business being royals into the royal families of Europe. Maybe Bill Simmons has a point -- maybe they are just a bunch of "fucking grifters" -- born and bred?
Maybe Jeffrey Epstein's and/or Hitler's crime syndicate(s), seemingly born out of the Privilegium maius-forged royal claims of the Habsburgs, should employ the following moto, "As long as you keep repeating something, it doesn’t matter what you say”?
Trump also said to Billy Bush on a hot mic, "You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy ... You can do anything.”
And so if you keep telling people you are President, even though you disqualified yourself in a treason and elections fraud conspiracy, and if you keep telling people you are a royal, and if you sing out in a choir that you aren't a child rapist, then "As long as you keep repeating something, it doesn’t matter what you say"?
Interestingly, Jeffrey Epstein's Trump made similar comments about doing whatever he wants per the lawsuit by Katie Johnson, which states Trump raped her at 13 year old, and/or 12 year old Marie Doe, who may or may not be Marie Farmer in the recent hoard of documents linked to the Maxwell conviction. The lawsuit of Katie Johnson, which is different but overlapping with the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, can be found at https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf, or you can download the same here.
We believe that anyone creating a spreadsheet of this family tree, after learning about these laws above, would come to the same conclusions as we have specified herein, is a reasonable inference.
Ignoring the black stripes of a zebra doesn't make it a white horse, unless you can convince everyone over and over and almost every day that all white horses look like striped zebras. As historical revisionist and fake royal propagandist William Shakespeare once wrote, "all the world's (a) stage(d)".
We applaud the UK's Republic for speaking truth to power for justice for raped and/or sex trafficked children by Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate, even if the same falls on deaf ears due to Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate operating above the law in not just the UK but around the world.
There were no fewer than 1,971 people named in Jeffrey Epstein's "little black book" of clients, financiers, friends, enablers, obstructors, and/or associates, found at www.epsteinsblackbook.com, and only about 10 or so have been brought to any sort of justice as far as we know.
Unite the left and the right against Jeffrey Epstein's billionaire's fright.
[1] Photo: https://mcdonalds.fandom.com/wiki/Hamburglar