As reported by Washington Times, "Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene vowed to keep pressuring House GOP leaders to impeach President Biden and top members of his team. Ms. Greene said Republicans should keep their promise to hold the Biden administration accountable. Specifically, she wants to see votes to impeach Mr. Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew Graves."
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/may/25/marjorie-taylor-greene-stirs-impeachment-plans-for/
Now as to what she wants to hold them accountable for, that of course is their respective, collective, and/or non-role (Biden) in some of the many more investigations, prosecutions, and/or lawsuits regarding Russia's and Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate's disqualified Donald Trump, seditionists, terrorists, insurrectionists, traitors, fake electors, hush money conspirators, stolen documents conspirators and leakers, organized crime, and/or other enemies of the United States, is a reasonable inference.
Next it is important to establish that Marjorie Taylor Greene had previously given aid, comforted, and/or adhered to these enemies of the United States, permanently and immediately disqualifying herself from public offices, and more than once.
More specifically, "Greene has promoted antisemitic and white supremacist views including the white genocide conspiracy theory,[6][7] QAnon, and Pizzagate.[8][9] ... Before running for Congress, Greene supported calls to execute prominent Democratic Party politicians, including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.[15] ... During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Greene promoted Russian propaganda and praised Vladimir Putin.[20] ... A vocal advocate of former president Donald Trump, Greene aided and supported Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 U.S. presidential election and has promoted Trump's false claims of a stolen election.[22] She called for the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election in Georgia to be decertified,[23] and was part of a group of Republican legislators who unsuccessfully challenged votes for Joe Biden during the 2021 United States Electoral College vote count, even though federal agencies and courts overseeing the election found no evidence of electoral fraud.[24]
Days after Biden's inauguration, Green filed articles of impeachment alleging abuse of power.[25][26] On February 4, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to remove Greene from all committee roles in response to her endorsements of political violence."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Taylor_Greene
Accordingly, within this context, someone who has immediately disqualified themselves from public office more than once, can't legitimately nor lawfully employ the office they disqualified themselves for in order to lead the impeachment against others who have been lawfully investigating the ongoing organized crime syndicate crimes Greene herself has furthered by given aid, comfort, and/or adhering to, and as an accessory after the fact to immediately disqualifying crimes, per common sense, stare decisis, a priori, and/or a fortiori. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se, this natural evil speaks for itself.
In support of Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Chris Wray, DC US Attorney Matt Graves, and President Biden, and in support of the Constitution -- but also seeking justice against this organized crime syndicate (who lynched the Editor of UpRights News BEFORE Trump ran for office, and where per Trump's 03/30/2023 public comments, Trump more likely than not ran for office in part to RICO obstruct justice for the unlawfully-seized and RICO obstructed investigation of the Editor of UpRights News by California/Sacramento GOP on 09/14/2014, because he said he knew about an investigation into him, the GOP, Russia, and/or others linked to his prosecutions BEFORE he ran for office 06/16/2015, which is our lynched Editor's RICO obstructed investigation into Trump, the GOP, and Russia, BEFORE Trump ran for office, is a reasonable inference, as specified in the articles found across our news sections, including, but not limited to The Big Pictures, Crossfire Hurricane Origins, Illegitimate Power, and Terror Log news sections, with links to the same found at the top of this page) -- the Editor of UpRights News recently contacted the Department of Justice, formerly controlled by Donald Trump, to let them know he has evidence that would be exculpatory evidence for impeachment against Attorney General Merrick Garland, the leader of the Department of Justice, who the Republicans also attempted to impeach in 2021.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hres743/text
More specifically, here are print screens of that civil rights complaint elucidating that our Editor has evidence that the Department of Justice needs, and specifying that this evidence elucidates the underlying crimes of Donald Trump and another enemies of the United States.
Important information to note on this first print screen is that it is not possible to provide the DOJ Civil Rights Division with evidence that supports that civil rights violation crimes have been committed against a victim, but instead the DOJ offers victims to let them know if they have evidence, and where our Editor did just that, letting the DOJ know that our Editor has evidence of major crimes against the United States, which prove civil rights violations against him. It is also important to note that it is a crime to falsely report crimes to the DOJ.
In the print screen above, the Editor specified to the DOJ that he has investigation materials that were seized by the Russians and a political party in CA. This alone should have immediately had someone from the DOJ contact the Editor of UpRights News. Also towards the bottom of this print screen, the Editor specified civil rights violations linked to these crimes he had investigation materials linked to Russia. Our Editor also specified that his civil rights violations involving a lynching, which is the obstruction of justice by means of a violent conspiracy, and where the Editor specified that the lynching involved a minority of corrupted law enforcement (color of law) personnel, bringing shame to those they serve with, who do a very difficult job well.
Here's how the DOJ specifies civil rights violations, and note that all of the following statutes were violated, as specified by our Editor in his complaint, and where the text in italics are specifically relevant to the civil rights complaint made by our Editor, which he specified he all sorts of evidence to be able to prove the same.
"Federal Civil Rights Statutes Title 18, U.S.C., Section 249 - Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act
This statute makes it unlawful to willfully cause bodily injury—or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon—when 1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or 2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
The law also provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate, prosecute, and prevent hate crimes.
The law provides for a maximum 10–year prison term, unless death (or attempts to kill) results from the offense, or unless the offense includes kidnapping or attempted kidnapping, or aggravated sexual abuse or attempted aggravated sexual abuse. For offenses not resulting in death, there is a seven–year statute of limitations. For offenses resulting in death, there is no statute of limitations.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.
Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as:
- A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;
- a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States;
- an applicant for federal employment or an employee by the federal government;
- a juror or prospective juror in federal court; and
- a participant in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as:
- A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college;
- a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by a state or local government;
- an applicant for private or state employment, private or state employee; a member or applicant for membership in any labor organization or hiring hall; or an applicant for employment through any employment agency, labor organization or hiring hall;
- a juror or prospective juror in state court;
- a traveler or user of any facility of interstate commerce or common carrier; or
- a patron of any public accommodation, including hotels, motels, restaurants, lunchrooms, bars, gas stations, theaters...or any other establishment which serves the public and which is principally engaged in selling food or beverages for consumption on the premises.
3) Prohibits interference by force or threat of force against any person because he/she is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or class of persons from participating or affording others the opportunity or protection to so participate, or lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate in any of the benefits or activities listed in items (1) and (2), above without discrimination as to race, color, religion, or national origin.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Prohibits (1) intentional defacement, damage, or destruction of any religious real property, because of the religious, racial, or ethnic characteristics of that property, or (2) intentional obstruction by force or threat of force, or attempts to obstruct any person in the enjoyment of that person's free exercise of religious beliefs. If the intent of the crime is motivated for reasons of religious animosity, it must be proven that the religious real property has a sufficient connection with interstate or foreign commerce. However, if the intent of the crime is racially motivated, there is no requirement to satisfy the interstate or foreign commerce clause.
Punishment varies from one year imprisonment and a fine or both, and if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, and the violation is by means of fire or an explosive, a fine under this title or imprisonment of not more than forty years or both; or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined in accordance with this title and imprisonment for up to twenty years, or both, and if death results or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined in accordance with this title and imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 844(h) - Federal Explosives Control Statute
Whoever (1) uses fire or an explosive to commit any felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, or (2) carries an explosive during the commission of any felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, including a felony which provides for an enhanced punishment if committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or device shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to imprisonment for five years but not more than 15 years. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction under this subsection, such persons shall be sentenced to imprisonment for ten years but not more than 25 years.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 3631 - Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing
This statute makes it unlawful for any individual(s), by the use of force or threatened use of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with (or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with), any person's housing rights because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Among those housing rights enumerated in the statute are:
- The sale, purchase, or renting of a dwelling;
- the occupation of a dwelling;
- the financing of a dwelling;
- contracting or negotiating for any of the rights enumerated above;
- applying for or participating in any service, organization, or facility relating to the sale or rental of dwellings.
This statute also makes it unlawful by the use of force or threatened use of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person who is assisting an individual or class of persons in the exercise of their housing rights.
Punishment varies from a fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results, shall be fined up to $10,000 or imprisoned up to ten years, or both, and if death results, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
- Excessive Force
- Discriminatory Harassment
- False Arrest
- Coercive Sexual Conduct
- Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests"
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/federal-civil-rights-statutes
Continuing to the next print screen, our Editor specified that he was tortured from behind while bound from behind, as part of a conspiracy plan caught on police video and recordings, during the course of his lynching.
He specified he was unlawfully stopped, searched, and his investigation on behalf of the government was seized by those named in that investigation, who then conspired to murder him, and where our Editor specified that evidence exists that proves the same.
Our Editor further specified that he was denied due process, Brady evidence, and that he was shopped exclusively to the political party (GOP) he had named in his lynched investigation along with Sacramento Police, who he had previously worked with, but later implicated as accessories after the fact to ongoing organized white collar and public corruption crimes.
Above and below he specified a conspiracy to violate his civil rights, including years of being threatened with deadly weapons under color of law, to intimidate him to never come forward, and below he specified that the evidence he repeatedly made reference to was also exculpatory evidence for the former and pending impeachment of Attorney General Merrick Garland.
In the print screen above, our Editor shored up his credibility by specifying he had three university degrees, 30 years of research experience, and specified he had been to law school (and had been a paid expert in criminal cases), but where lynching violence prohibited him from continuing law school, which implied our Editor was familiar with the elements of laws, their sources, and their authorities.
Then above and below our Editor let the DOJ know that the evidence he specified as being part of his investigations that were lynched by the GOP, Sacramento Police, and others named in that investigation, were linked to the prosecution and crimes of Donald Trump, Russia, and other enemies of the United States.
Our Editor further specified as someone who had been to law school, and who had evidence supporting his claims, that his civil rights were violated to RICO obstruct the murder and endangerment of children, in part which has no statute of limitation, and he specified that he was discriminated against in violation of his civil rights at three universities.
Any one of these claims, which can't falsely be made to the DOJ without being prosecuted, should have triggered a civil rights investigation and/or criminal referral, but instead, an "anonymous person", allegedly from the DOJ Civil Rights Division, specified by email that some other "anonymous person" would "carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have the authority to help with your report".
Following a "careful reading" of the civil rights complaint elucidating major crimes and major civil rights violations against our Editor, the DOJ would be in a position to open an investigation or to take some some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department, and that they collect more information before looking at the report, and they could recommend another government agency to "properly look" into the report.
In some cases, per the print screen above, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ may determine the following -- they "don't have the legal authority to handle the report", but as specified above, the DOJ Civil Rights Division did have the legal authority, because of the major violations of civil rights against our Editor, which he specified he had evidence to prove the same. However, as stated above, "if they don't have the legal authority to handle the report, then they would recommend seeking help from a lawyer or legal aid organization".
Here's how an "anonymous person" allegedly from the DOJ Civil Rights Division responded to a civil rights complaint supported by evidence that could prove major civil rights violations against the Editor of UpRights News, "we have decided not to take ANY further action on your complaint", and based on their "careful reading", and where they recommended contacting the State Bar Association (for an attorney) or a local legal aid organization, but where that recommendation per the previous "anonymous" email would only be issued if the DOJ didn't have the legal authority, when of course they did, and where they also specified they had the authority to have the civil rights complaint of the Editor of UpRights News "properly looked at" by other more appropriate agencies.
This leads us to conclude any of the following.
(1) The anonymous person who responded to us was not from the Department of Justice, but was impersonating an officer, pretending to be from the Department of Justice, and employing art work and the like to make it look like the response came from the Department of Justice, in which case our communications are being intercepted, and responded to by those intercepting the same, to continue the RICO obstruction of justice for the matters that were communicated as an accessory after the fact. This has happened to many others in the past.
https://ovc.ojp.gov/fraud-alert-scammers-claiming-be-fbi-or-other-federal-agents
Similarly, and before filing this legitimate and actionable civil rights complaint, we have repeatedly been contacted by individuals claiming to be with the FBI or other branches of the DOJ, who have asked prying questions as to the nature of our investigations, and where we have let them know that we would be glad to meet with them, but that we weren't interested in speaking about our investigations over the phone, but that we would gladly meet with investigators at their offices, where their coworkers would be able to vet who they are, which we were told was not something they wanted to do. This of course aroused our suspicions that those calling about our investigations were not from the FBI or other agencies we have been communicating with, but others with malevolent intent to further RICO obstruct our investigations, especially as we have formerly organized for certain investigators to receive our evidence and investigation materials, and so why would they be calling us inquiring about receiving the same, but not wanting us to meet with them? Suspicious as hell.
OR
(2) The anonymous person was from the Department of Justice, and corrupted their public offices, in order to give aid, comfort, and/or adhere to one or more of the greatest enemies of the United States in all of its history, in violation of their oath of office, official capacity, legal authority, and/or employment protections, and thus immediately disqualifying that person from public office and/or government employment, per all sorts of laws, and where the Department of Justice employees know, and/or it is reasonable for them to know, that misconduct like this as accessories after the fact are criminal offenses.
Furthermore, because Trump, Barr, Bush, Rod Rosenstein, and/or others involved in this organized crime syndicate and the RICO obstruction of justice for their crimes as accessories after the fact once controlled the hiring, firing, transfers, promotions, and the like at the DOJ, this opens up the possibility that they may have and/or likely installed organized crime loyalists into key positions or over manufactured investigations into their perceived enemies (anyone trying to hold them accountable for any manner), in order for their ongoing organized crime syndicate to continue to RICO obstruct justice for these enemies of the United States as accessories after the fact.
To get to the bottom of this, we have published this situation, so that if someone is intercepting our communications and posing as the DOJ or impersonating an officer, then hopefully the DOJ will come to learn about the same through this article, and invite us again to come to a local facility, where we can further debrief the government.
In a similar, we want to thank our allies at The Hague for sharing our story meant to reach Prosecutor Karim Khan for related and overlapping issues we have reported on are all part of the same ongoing organized crime syndicate involving the same people, families, organizations, and countries.
Our web host let us know that as many as four attempts to contact us may have been attempted, but to be clear, we have received no communications from our allies at The Hague, and so if communications were sent to us, then they were seemingly intercepted by enemies of the United States, the UK Commonwealth, and their European allies.
Many of our communications have gone into what appear black holes, where those people who would be expected to respond to us for more information or evidence helping, haven't, don't, won't, and/or can't, due to possible communications interference. Here we will publish that we have made attempts to contact Jack Smith, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, Attorney General Garland, SDNY, Robert Mueller, the White House, Homeland Security, the FBI, and/or many others, EACH of whom would surely benefit by meeting with us, and yet these communications have also mostly gone into black holes, with little to no reasonable responses, when most criminal investigators informed of witnesses and evidence for their cases would normally and reasonably want to follow up with those leads, but not here, and thus providing us a reasonable basis to infer that our communications may be subject to interception to further RICO obstruct all of the crimes we have elucidated with evidence and the elements of the law, their sources, and their authorities.
Our web host has also let us know that there has been a steady interest in our reporting from non-English-speaking countries of Russia, Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan, and other countries linked to Trump's ongoing organized crime syndicate, in the context that Russia began stalking and cyberattacking our investigation into Russians, oligarch operating in Russia, Trump Tower tenants, and the GOP by 10/20/2013, and where that cyberterrorism has been overly furthered as recent as this month.