New Zealand physicists confirm what UpRights News' Canadian science writer predicted beforehand, specifically that dark energy does not exist.

Published on 3 February 2025 at 15:52

02/03/2025

 

Physicists in New Zealand have confirmed a part of the theory put forward by UpRights News' science writer, specifically, that dark energy does not exist.

 

"Their analysis has been published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters.

For the past 100 years, physicists have generally assumed that the cosmos is growing equally in all directions. They employed the concept of dark energy as a placeholder to explain unknown physics they couldn't understand, but the contentious theory has always had its problems.

Now a team of physicists and astronomers at the university of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand are challenging the status quo, using improved analysis of supernovae light curves to show that the universe is expanding in a more varied, "lumpier" way.

The new evidence supports the "timescape" model of cosmic expansion, which doesn't have a need for dark energy because the differences in stretching light aren't the result of an accelerating universe but instead a consequence of how we calibrate time and distance.

It takes into account that gravity slows time, so an ideal clock in empty space ticks faster than inside a galaxy.

The model suggests that a clock in the Milky Way would be about 35 percent slower than the same one at an average position in large cosmic voids, meaning billions more years would have passed in voids. This would in turn allow more expansion of space, making it seem like the expansion is getting faster when such vast empty voids grow to dominate the universe."

 

https://phys.org/news/2024-12-dark-energy-doesnt-lumpy-universe.html

 

UpRights News' science writer came to the same conclusion, albeit earlier, and argued that dark energy can't possibly exist, because the same would violate the laws of thermodynamics in physics and chemistry, specifically the part about energy can't be created, a contribution of Emilie de Chatelet, who elucidated the same while going through the classical mechanics of Isaac Newton.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89milie_du_Ch%C3%A2telet

 

Advocates for dark energy have pulled a sort of a slight of hand in their reasoning, arguing that over 14 billion years after the Big Bang released the most energy it could, that some exponential source of energy at the center of the Big Bang was the cause of the furthest galaxies accelerating towards the unobservable universe, and that the rate of acceleration was constant, which the New Zealand researchers proved the opposite, the rate of acceleration is not constant.

 

The clumpy or not constant nature of the universe and the non-constant acceleration of the clumpy universe is better explained by gravity argues UpRights News's science writer, and the non-constant acceleration of galaxies is instead caused by the much greater clumpy matter outside of the observable universe than within the observable universe, causing the exploded Big Bang content to literally fall in every directions towards the much greater mass towards the unobservable universe, exerting a gravitational force far superior to any force of gravity within the observable universe is a reasonable inference. 

 

This recent research supports that the unobservable universe exists and is pulling on the Big Bang matter, and the furthest galaxies are acceleration, because they are closer to the much greater mass outside of the observable universe. The smaller the distance between two masses, the stronger the force of gravity between the two is what accounts for the acceleration of the furthest galaxies is a reasonable inference.

 

The boundary of the observable universe is literally defined by our best technologies' ability to observe further, and so in the time of the Greeks and Romans, the observable universe had a smaller boundary relative to the Hubble and James Webb subsequent telescopes, whose data is now being processed by artificial intelligence, including but not limited to at UC Santa Cruz.

 

Accordingly, the history of innovation lets us know that the universe doesn't just stop at our furthest observations, and where there are theories in physics that support that it goes on forever. Forever is really far, and so even if we turned all of the planets into one giant telescope, then we would only be able to see that far, and the border or the observable universe would only be that far.

 

Baked into us is the fact that we have a beginning and end, but as Emilie de Chatelet proved, somethings like energy have no beginning and they have no end, but rather, perpetually change (forever), and as Einstein proved, anything that has mass, has a corresponding quantity of energy. Higgs Boson research supports Einstein's research in that mass may be slowed down or a condensate of infinitely changing energy.