07/12/2026
An interesting revelation in the news this last week, where Trump's ex-wife -- the same one he is accused of raping, and pulling chunks of hair out of her skull, and yup, the some one that mysteriously died thereafter -- has been accused of recruiting sex trafficking victims from Trump properties, businesses, and/or events in the same role or manner as madam Ghislaine Maxwell, in the context that recent reporting at least suggested that Melania may have been one of Epstein's girls that Trump stole, in the context Trump accused Epstein of stealing girls, including but not limited to Virginia Guiffre, from Trump's properties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
"A former beauty queen who alleges Donald Trump groped her at a 1993 pageant has claimed the president’s first wife, Ivana, funneled young women into Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit the same way Ghislaine Maxwell did, in the final part of an exclusive three-part interview with the Daily Beast’s new Substack, PunchUp.
Beatrice Keul, 55, alleges Ivana Trump operated as a reassuring presence at high-end events where Epstein’s circle could scout and later isolate women.
“Was Maxwell a madam or an enabler? However you would describe her, Ivana was the same.”
Ivana—mother to Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric—died in 2022 at the age of 73. She was never charged with any Epstein-related offense.
PunchUp previously reported Keul’s claims that Trump, then 47, assaulted her at his Donald J. Trump American Dream Pageant when she was a 23-year-old banking executive and model, and threatened her if she spoke out. She has also claimed that Epstein told her she was his intended “prey.”"
This new information calls into question what Ivana was being paid by Epstein to recruit sex trafficking victims for Epstein at Trump properties, events, and businesses, and calls into question whether or not Trump profited off Ivana recruiting for Epstein as a result, but then that would be reflected in Trump's finances, which Ghislaine Maxwell's and Russia's 2016's lawyer-turned-US Attorney General Todd Blanche doesn't want ever investigated again, despite over 30 felony charges and convictions disqualifying Trump and thus Blanche from public office, linked to Trump's "business interests".
Accordingly, to Marjorie taylor Greene, Pam Bondi, and Jamie Raskin -- Trump's "business interests" -- which are heavily linked to Jeffrey Epstein treasonous child sex traffickers involved in war crimes against women and children elsewhere as a distraction from the Epstein files they can grift off to the tune of billions of dollars in government contracts -- are the reason he stole the documents from the government, which separately disqualified him from office, in an elections fraud and insurrection conspiracy, each of which further disqualified Trump from public office, is a reasonable inference.
But that revelation only implicated Aileen Cannon further in Trump's and Epstein's ongoing RICO obstruction conspiracy for disqualifying crimes, because it means she sealed Jack Smith's investigation materials to RICO obstruct for Jeffrey Epstein and Trump, and we know that is true, because we gave DOJ and Jack Smith via WA AUSA and DOS RFJ Seattle (on the same day Seattle was cyberattacked at the exact same time our Editor tried to submit RFJ submission online via DOS and Tor, and so the intent of that Seattle cyberattack was most likely to RICO obstruct a DOS RFJ submission online, requiring our Editor to go into the office to DOS RFJ to submit in person, also giving a recorded interview, all RICO obstructed since then to keep Epstein's crime syndicate in a stranglehold over America and Americans squeezing everything they can out of them, jacking inflation, trying to make them economic slaves is certain, while starting illegal wars to engage in war crimes against innocent women and children, while screaming they are the best Christians ever.
And so DOJ and Blanche don't want Trump's felony-convicted business investigated for additional financial crimes after the DOJ admitted they are obstructing the release of Epstein files from Congress (our files, the ones that prove Trump was never qualified to be president BEFORE SCOTUS' "retroactive immunity for the disqualified people that appointed them" self-appointing fabrications allegedly apply.
And yet as we have reported, Trump proxies linked to DOJ, McClellan Park, Beale AFB, and/or others have continued unlawful search of the Editor of Uprights News, violating their own directive to stop investigating Trump's "business interests", but as we can prove our files were sealed with Trump's business interests, then any unlawful search of us by Trump proxies is an unlawful search of Trump by Trump proxies, and so violates DOJ's and Blanche's directive to no longer investigate Trump's "business interests" or taxes or finances, in an era where Jeffrey Epstein's bank accounts and emails have been released and he had all sorts of leverage over Trump, and he usually blackmailed those he had leverage over, by managing their accounts and/or directing their "gifting" and "donations" for 30X the fees normally charged, the difference being the blackmailed funds to Epstein requiring laundering through those he blackmailed.
Morrison England has already RICO obstructed CA's lawful access to Trump's finances, and so it seems clear that a giant red flashing signal is coming from Trump's financial records, because Ghislaine Maxwell's former attorney doesn't want anyone to ever look at Trump's total finances (prior to the 2016 election the Trump's were heavily indebted hundreds of millions of dollars to Russia, China, and/or others, but per DOJ files, Epstein was Putin's money manager as he was Wexner's and Black's, the latter two subject to blackmail and money laundering in the hundreds of millions, and so why not Putin or Trump -- and now Trump is a multi-billionaire only after Epstein was murdered under the auspices of Leon Black's and Epstein's Bill Barr and Epstein's Trump? Why would Epstein break his habit of blackmailing and controlling everyone in his usual manner here?
Res ipsa loquitur malum in se here, it is more likely than not that Epstein did not make an exception for Putin and Trump, as made clear by Epstein going after Cambridge Analytica's SCL's Mountbattens, arguably the most powerful family on Earth with "The Prince Andrew Treatment", specified Edge Foundation's John Brockman -- and more likely that like Leon Black as described by Ghislaine Maxwell -- they were bled "dry" like "spigots", until they murdered Epstein or had him murdered, and then suddenly Trump's finances markedly improved into the billions. This is the kind of story that eventually writes itself. With Cannon, Thomas, Morrison England, Blanche, Bondi, Barr, Sessions, and/or others RICO obstructing access to Trump's full financial history, they are basically screaming into the future to "look over here", and by stalking and intimidating the Editor of Uprights News in an ongoing manner constituting deprivation of rights under color of law, the de facto executive behaving badly and in bad faith, per Prakash and Smith (2006) and per Baude and Paulsen (2024), has already violated their own directive not to investigate what clearly needs to be investigated.
In a similar manner, DOJ and others have seemingly repeatedly violated Aileen Cannon's order, and/or been accused of violating Cannon's (illegal) order (illegal as it is depriving the government, and others our rights under color of law -- them seeking to RICO obstruct major crimes against the US, kids, and the Editor of Uprights News (and other Epstein victims) -- and so as Jamie Raskin called out, this seems to be a case of "pick the laws you want to follow or not follow" as a new legal precedent for everyone.